Literature DB >> 27566224

Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations.

Elisabetta Costantini1, Linda Brubaker2, Mauro Cervigni3, Catherine A Matthews4, Barry A O'Reilly5, Diaa Rizk6, Konstantinos Giannitsas7, Christopher F Maher8.   

Abstract

Sacrocolpopexy is considered a reference operation for pelvic organ prolapse repair but its indications and technical aspects are not standardized. A faculty of urogynecology surgeons critically evaluated the peer-reviewed literature published until September 2015 aiming to produce evidence-based recommendations. PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published in English language. The modified Oxford data grading system was used to access quality of evidence and grade recommendations. The Delphi process was implemented when no data was available. Thirteen randomized, controlled trials were identified, that provided levels 1 to 3 of evidence on various aspects of sacrocolpopexy. Sacrocolpopexy is the preferred procedure for vaginal apical prolapse (Grade A), monofilament polypropylene mesh is the graft of choice and the laparoscopic approach is the preferred technique (Grade B). Grade B recommendation supports the performance of concomitant procedures at the time of sacrocolpopexy. Grade C recommendation suggests either permanent or delayed sutures for securing the mesh to the vagina, permanent tackers or sutures for securing the mesh to the sacral promontory and closing the peritoneum over the mesh. A Delphi process Grade C recommendation supports proceeding with sacrocolpopexy after uncomplicated, intraoperative bladder or small bowel injuries. There is insufficient or conflicting data on hysterectomy (total or subtotal) or uterus preservation during sacrocolpopexy (Grade D). Sacrocolpopexy remains an excellent option for vaginal apical prolapse repair. The issue of uterine preservation or excision during the procedure requires further clarification. Variations exist in the performance of most technical aspects of the procedure.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Recommendations; Sacrocolpopexy; Technical aspects

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566224     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  15 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anood Alfahmy; Amr Mahran; Britt Conroy; Rosemary R Brewka; Mostafa Ibrahim; David Sheyn; Sherif A El-Nashar; Adonis Hijaz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Titanized polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Campagna; Luigi Pedone Anchora; Giovanni Panico; Daniela Caramazza; Martina Arcieri; Mauro Cervigni; Giovanni Scambia; Alfredo Ercoli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Obesity and its long-term impact on sacrocolpopexy key outcomes (OBELISK).

Authors:  Martin Smazinka; Vladimir Kalis; Martin Havir; Linda Havelkova; Khaled M Ismail; Zdenek Rusavy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Transvaginal single-port laparoscopic pelvic reconstruction with Y-shaped mesh: experiences of 93 cases.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Changdong Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Keqin Hua; Yisong Chen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pilkinton; Gregory C Levine; Laura Bennett; Harvey A Winkler; Dara F Shalom; Peter S Finamore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study).

Authors:  Daniel Gagyor; Vladimir Kalis; Martin Smazinka; Zdenek Rusavy; Radovan Pilka; Khaled M Ismail
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiang Yang; Yong He; Xiaoyi Zhang; Zhi Wang; Xiaohu Zuo; Likun Gao; Li Hong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

8.  Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Yizhen Sima; Keqin Hua; Yisong Chen; Changdong Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Zhiying Lu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A Survey of Operative Techniques Used by Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgeons Performing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy.

Authors:  Alexandra Dubinskaya; Kaitlin Renkosiak; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-13

10.  A new method of adjusting mesh tension using cystoscopy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Yukiko Nomura; Yoshiyuki Okada; Aya Hiramatsu; Eiji Matsubara; Kumiko Kato; Yasukuni Yoshimura
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.