Literature DB >> 27565286

Predicting the Burden of Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Simulation of a 20-Year Horizon.

Richard E Guerrero-Ludueña1, Mercè Comas2, Mireia Espallargues3, Moisès Coll4, Miquel Pons5, Santiago Sabatés6, Alejandro Allepuz7, Xavier Castells8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate future utilization scenarios for knee arthroplasty (KA) revision in the Spanish National Health System in the short- and long-term and their impact on primary KA utilization.
METHODS: A discrete-event simulation model was built to represent KA utilization for 20 years (2012-2031) in the Spanish National Health System. Data on KA utilization from 1997 to 2011 were obtained from the minimum data set. Three scenarios of future utilization of primary KA (1, fixed number since 2011; 2, fixed age- and sex-adjusted rates since 2011; and 3, projection using a linear regression model) were combined with two prosthesis survival functions (W [worse survival], from a study including primary KA from 1995 to 2000; and B [better survival], from the Catalan Registry of Arthroplasty, including primary KA from 2005 to 2013). The simulation results were analyzed in the short-term (2015) and the long-term (2030).
RESULTS: Variations in the number of revisions depended on both the primary utilization rate and the survival function applied, ranging from increases of 8.3% to 31.6% in the short- term and from 38.3% to 176.9% in the long-term, corresponding to scenarios 1-B and 3-W, respectively. The prediction of increases in overall surgeries ranged from 0.1% to 22.3% in the short-term and from 3.7% to 98.2% in the long-term.
CONCLUSIONS: Projections of the burden of KA provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions on the concentration of high-complexity procedures, the number of orthopedic surgeons required to perform these procedures, and the resources needed.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  burden of illness; health care utilization; osteoarthritis; simulation models

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565286     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  4 in total

1.  Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Juliette A Meyer; Mark Zhu; Alana Cavadino; Brendan Coleman; Jacob T Munro; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019.

Authors:  Alexander Upfill-Brown; Peter P Hsiue; Troy Sekimura; Brendan Shi; Seth A Ahlquist; Jay N Patel; Micah Adamson; Alexandra I Stavrakis
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-21

3.  The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years.

Authors:  Manuel Weißenberger; Alexander Klug; Yves Gramlich; Maximilian Rudert; Philipp Drees; Reinhard Hoffmann; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Recommendations for return to sports after total hip arthroplasty are becoming less restrictive as implants improve.

Authors:  T Vu-Han; S Hardt; R Ascherl; C Gwinner; C Perka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.