Literature DB >> 27565151

Ethics Teaching in Higher Education for Principled Reasoning: A Gateway for Reconciling Scientific Practice with Ethical Deliberation.

Mehmet Aközer1, Emel Aközer2.   

Abstract

This paper proposes laying the groundwork for principled moral reasoning as a seminal goal of ethics interventions in higher education, and on this basis, makes a case for educating future specialists and professionals with a foundation in philosophical ethics. Identification of such a seminal goal is warranted by (1) the progressive dissociation of scientific practice and ethical deliberation since the onset of a problematic relationship between science and ethics around the mid-19th century, and (2) the extensive mistrust of integrating ethics in science and engineering curricula beyond its "applied," "practical," or "professional" implications. Although calls by international scientific and educational bodies to strengthen ethics teaching in scientific education over the past quarter century have brought about a notion of combining competence in a certain field with competence in ethics, this is neither entrenched in the academic community, nor fleshed out as regards its core or instruments to realize it. The legitimate goals of ethics teaching in higher education, almost settled since the 1980s, can be subsumed under the proposed seminal goal, and the latter also would safeguard content and methods of ethics interventions against the intrusion of indoctrinative approaches. In this paper, derivation of the proposed seminal goal rests on an interpretation of the Kohlbergian cognitive-developmental conception of moral adulthood consisting in autonomous principled moral reasoning. This interpretation involves, based on Kant's conception of the virtuous person, integrating questions about the "good life" into the domain of principled reasoning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive-developmental approach to moral education; Competence in ethics; Indoctrination in moral education; Kantian conception of virtue; Legitimate goals of ethics teaching; Principled moral reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565151     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9813-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  11 in total

1.  Ethics and the responsibility of science. Background paper for the World Science Conference, Budapest June 26-July 1, 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: contents, educational setup and experiences.

Authors:  I R van de Poel; H Zandvoort; M Brumsen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Introducing ethics and engineering: the case of Delft University of Technology.

Authors:  G J Scheurwater; S J Doorman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be?

Authors:  John M Ziman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  "Mind the gaps": an empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Robert E McGinn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach.

Authors:  Eddie Conlon; Henk Zandvoort
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Beyond Ethical Frameworks: Using Moral Experimentation in the Engineering Ethics Classroom.

Authors:  Olivia Walling
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The essential role of medical ethics education in achieving professionalism: the Romanell Report.

Authors:  Joseph A Carrese; Janet Malek; Katie Watson; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Michael J Green; Laurence B McCullough; Gail Geller; Clarence H Braddock; David J Doukas
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  A psychologist looks at the teaching of ethics.

Authors:  J R Rest
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  Basing Science Ethics on Respect for Human Dignity.

Authors:  Mehmet Aközer; Emel Aközer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.