| Literature DB >> 27564705 |
Amina Amadou1, Carine Biessy1, Sabina Rinaldi1, Veronika Fedirko2, Nada Assi1, Martin Lajous3,4, Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo3, Elsa Yunes3, Ruy Lopez-Ridaura3, Gabriela Torres-Mejia3, Isabelle Romieu1,3.
Abstract
Low circulating levels of vitamin D and high mammographic density (MD) have been associated with higher risk of breast cancer. Although some evidence suggested an inverse association between circulating vitamin D and MD, no studies have investigated this association among Mexican women. We examined whether serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] levels were associated with MD in a cross-sectional study nested within the large Mexican Teacher's Cohort. This study included 491 premenopausal women with a mean age of 42.9 years. Serum 25(OH)D3 levels were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Linear regression and non-linear adjusted models were used to estimate the association of MD with serum 25(OH)D3. Median serum 25(OH)D3 level was 27.3 (23.3-32.8) (ng/ml). Forty one (8%) women had 25(OH)D3 levels in the deficient range (< 20 ng/ml). Body mass index (BMI) and total physical activity were significantly correlated with 25(OH)D3 (r = -0.109, P = 0.019 and r = 0.095, P = 0.003, respectively). In the multivariable linear regression, no significant association was observed between 25(OH)D3 levels and MD overall. However, in stratified analyses, higher serum 25(OH)D3 levels (≥27.3 ng/ml) were significantly inversely associated with percent MD among women with BMI below the median (β = -0.52, P = 0.047). Although no significant association was observed between serum 25(OH)D3 and percent MD in the overall population, specific subgroups of women may benefit from higher serum 25(OH)D3 levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27564705 PMCID: PMC5001725 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the study population across predefined cut-points of serum 25(OH)D3.
| Serum 25(OH)D3 (ng/ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | < 20 (n = 41) | 20–29 (n = 265) | ≥ 30 (n = 185) | P-value |
| Age at mammography (years) | 43.6±4.2 | 43.1±3.6 | 42.6±3.6 | 0.457 |
| Age at menarche (years) | 12.2±1.2 | 12.5±1.4 | 12.5±1.5 | 0.343 |
| Age at 1st full term pregnancy (years) | 24.8±4.4 | 24.8±4.3 | 24.6±4.8 | 0.407 |
| parity | 1.77±1.4 | 2.13±1.2 | 2.16±1.2 | 0.261 |
| Total physical activity (MetS per week) | 24.3±16.7 | 25.9±19.5 | 28.7±25.0 | <0.001 |
| Percent MD | 36.4±18.6 | 37.6±17.5 | 37.1±17.1 | 0.778 |
| Dense area (cm2) | 46.8±30.6 | 50.5±34.6 | 48.1±31.8 | 0.343 |
| Non dense area (cm2) | 83.4±45.4 | 82.1±39.9 | 78.7±33.1 | 0.005 |
| Region | ||||
| Jalisco | 26(10.6) | 126(51.6) | 92(37.7) | 0.167 |
| Veracruz | 15(6.1) | 139(56.3) | 93(37.6) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | ||||
| < 30 kg/m2 | 22(7.1) | 161(51.7) | 128(41.2) | 0.076 |
| ≥ 30 kg/m2 | 19(10.5) | 104(57.8) | 57(31.7) | |
| Breastfeeding | ||||
| Never | 10(19.2) | 25(48.1) | 17(32.7) | 0.011 |
| Ever | 31(7.1) | 240(54.7) | 168 (38.3) | |
| Alcohol intake | ||||
| No | 14(9.9) | 65(46.1) | 62(44.0) | 0.085 |
| Yes | 27(7.7) | 200(57.1) | 123(35.1) | |
| Ever use of hormonal contraceptive | ||||
| No | 24(10.5) | 124(54.1) | 81(35.4) | 0.364 |
| Yes | 17(6.9) | 133(54.1) | 96(39.0) | |
| Missing | 0(0) | 8(50) | 8(5) | |
| Family history of breast cancer | ||||
| No | 38(8.1) | 252(53.7) | 179(38.2) | 0.462 |
| Yes | 3(13.6) | 13(59.1) | 6(27.3) | |
| Socio economic status | ||||
| Low | 5(7.1) | 39(55.7) | 26(37.1) | 0.519 |
| Medium | 19(10.3) | 102(55.1) | 64(34.6) | |
| High | 15(8.9) | 89(52.9) | 64(38.1) | |
| Missing | 2(2.9) | 35(51.5) | 31(45.6) | |
P value based on chi square and ANOVA tests.
Correlation between serum 25(OH)D3 and other risk factors.
| Characteristic | n | Spearman correlation coefficient | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 491 | -0.045 | 0.311 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 454 | -0.109 | 0.019 |
| WHR | 430 | 0.017 | 0.723 |
| Total physical activity (MetS/week) | 490 | 0.095 | 0.035 |
| Dietary calcium intake (mg/day) | 474 | -0.041 | 0.361 |
| IGF1 (ng/ml) | 474 | 0.016 | 0.719 |
| IGFBP3 (ng/ml) | 474 | 0.082 | 0.069 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist hip to hip ratio, MetS, metabolic equivalents of energy expenditure.
a Spearman correlation coefficient adjusted for age, total physical activity and BMI.
b P-value.
Multivariable linear regression estimates of percent MD (%), dense area (cm2), and non-dense area (cm2).
| Characteristic | Percent Mammographic density (%) | Dense area (cm2) | Non-dense area (cm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β coefficient (95% CI) | P-value | β coefficient(95% CI) | P-value | β coefficient (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Serum 25(OH)D3 (ng/ml) | ||||||
| Overall | -0.02(-0.24, 0.20) | 0.840 | 0.07(-0.37, 0.50) | 0.754 | -0.13(-0.53, 0.28) | 0.537 |
| < median (27.3 ng/ml) | 0.25(-0.42, 0.91) | 0.469 | 1.02(-0.27, 2.31) | 0.121 | -0.2(-1.45, 1.04) | 0.747 |
| ≥ median(27.3 ng/ml) | -0.39(-0.81, 0.01) | 0.059 | -0.42(-1.21, 0.37) | 0.295 | 0.34(-0.36, 1.04) | 0.338 |
| Predefined categories | ||||||
| < 20 | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | |||
| 20–30 | 1.98(-3.67, 7.63) | 0.491 | 7.03(-3.92, 17.99) | 0.208 | 0.05(-10.23, 10.33) | 0.992 |
| ≥ 30 | 1.26(-4.67, 7.19) | 0.676 | 6.38(-5.11, 17.88) | 0.276 | -0.71(-11.50, 10.08) | 0.897 |
| Region | ||||||
| Jalisco | -0.05(-0.35, 0.24) | 0.725 | 0.05(-0.52, 0.63) | 0.850 | 0.19(-0.46, 0.50) | 0.937 |
| Veracruz | 0.05(-0.27, 0.37) | 0.759 | 0.19(-0.44, 0.82) | 0.550 | -0.07(-0.73, 0.58) | 0.827 |
| Age | -1.73(-3.63, 0.17) | 0.074 | -2.97(-6.67, 0.73) | 0.116 | 0.46(-3.00, 3.93) | 0.793 |
| Age at menarche | 0.41(-0.59, 1.41) | 0.423 | 0.63(-1.31, 2.59) | 0.523 | -0.26(-2.09, 1.57) | 0.779 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | -0.52(-0.80, -0.23) | <0.001 | 1.42(0.87, 1.97) | <0.001 | 4.32(3.81, -4.83) | <0.001 |
| Total physical activity (MetS per week) | 0.008(-0.06, 0.07) | 0.812 | -0.03(-0.16, 0.09) | 0.627 | -0.04(-0.16, 0.08) | 0.533 |
Multivariable models were adjusted for age, age at menarche, body mass index, total physical activity and region/season.
Fig 1Association of serum 25(OH)D3 and percent MD, stratified by BMI.
Based on population distribution, the quartiles (25th percentile, 50th percentile, 75th percentile) of percent MD that divide the MD set into four equal group were estimated (MD ≤ 22.6%, 22.6–37.7%,; 37.5–51.9%, and > 51.9%). A subset of women was selected based on whether they had low percent MD (≤ 22.6%) or high percent MD (> 51.9%), and 25(OH)D3 concentrations were compared by multivariable logistic regressions. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, age at menarche, total physical activity and season of blood draw. Median BMI = 27.4 kg/m2, median serum 25(OH)D = 27.3ng/ml. N (high/low): number (high MD/ low MD), OR: odds ratio; 95% CI 95% confidence interval.
Fig 2Fractional polynomial modelling of the association of serum 25(OH)D3 (ng/ml) with percent mammography density (MD).
A model with 95%CI among women with: A) BMI < median (< 27.4 kgm2), B) BMI ≥ median (≥ 27.4 kgm2).