Literature DB >> 27564548

Using Nature's "Tricks" To Rationally Tune the Binding Properties of Biomolecular Receptors.

Francesco Ricci1, Alexis Vallée-Bélisle2, Anna J Simon, Alessandro Porchetta1, Kevin W Plaxco.   

Abstract

The biosensor community has long focused on achieving the lowest possible detection limits, with specificity (the ability to differentiate between closely similar target molecules) and sensitivity (the ability to differentiate between closely similar target concentrations) largely being relegated to secondary considerations and solved by the inclusion of cumbersome washing and dilution steps or via careful control experimental conditions. Nature, in contrast, cannot afford the luxury of washing and dilution steps, nor can she arbitrarily change the conditions (temperature, pH, ionic strength) under which binding occurs in the homeostatically maintained environment within the cell. This forces evolution to focus at least as much effort on achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity as on achieving low detection limits, leading to the "invention" of a number of mechanisms, such as allostery and cooperativity, by which the useful dynamic range of receptors can be tuned, extended, narrowed, or otherwise optimized by design, rather than by sample manipulation. As the use of biomolecular receptors in artificial technologies matures (i.e., moves away from multistep, laboratory-bound processes and toward, for example, systems supporting continuous in vivo measurement) and these technologies begin to mimic the reagentless single-step convenience of naturally occurring chemoperception systems, the ability to artificially design receptors of enhanced sensitivity and specificity will likely also grow in importance. Thus motivated, we have begun to explore the adaptation of nature's solutions to these problems to the biomolecular receptors often employed in artificial biotechnologies. Using the population-shift mechanism, for example, we have generated nested sets of receptors and allosteric inhibitors that greatly expanded the normally limited (less than 100-fold) useful dynamic range of unmodified molecular and aptamer beacons, enabling the single-step (e.g., dilution-free) measurement of target concentrations across up to 6 orders of magnitude. Using this same approach to rationally introduce sequestration or cooperativity into these receptors, we have likewise narrowed their dynamic range to as little as 1.5-fold, vastly improving the sensitivity with which they respond to small changes in the concentration of their target ligands. Given the ease with which we have been able to introduce these mechanisms into a wide range of DNA-based receptors and the rapidity with which the field of biomolecular design is maturing, we are optimistic that the use of these and similar naturally occurring regulatory mechanisms will provide viable solutions to a range of increasingly important analytical problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27564548      PMCID: PMC5660318          DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  50 in total

1.  Extended-range glucose sensor employing engineered glucose dehydrogenases.

Authors:  T Yamazaki; K Kojima; K Sode
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Electrochemical interrogation of conformational changes as a reagentless method for the sequence-specific detection of DNA.

Authors:  Chunhai Fan; Kevin W Plaxco; Alan J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Engineering a signal transduction mechanism for protein-based biosensors.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kohn; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Functional aptamers and aptazymes in biotechnology, diagnostics, and therapy.

Authors:  Michael Famulok; Jörg S Hartig; Günter Mayer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Dynamic allosteric control of noncovalent DNA catalysis reactions.

Authors:  David Yu Zhang; Erik Winfree
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Biologically inspired dynamic material systems.

Authors:  André R Studart
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Supramolecular polymer adhesives: advanced materials inspired by nature.

Authors:  Christian Heinzmann; Christoph Weder; Lucas Montero de Espinosa
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  A multiple-ligand approach to extending the dynamic range of analyte quantification in protein microarrays.

Authors:  Olof Andersson; Henrik Nikkinen; Daniel Kanmert; Karin Enander
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Synthetic in vitro transcriptional oscillators.

Authors:  Jongmin Kim; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches.

Authors:  Jongmin Kim; Kristin S White; Erik Winfree
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  13 in total

1.  Aptamer Recognition of Multiplexed Small-Molecule-Functionalized Substrates.

Authors:  Nako Nakatsuka; Huan H Cao; Stephanie Deshayes; Arin L Melkonian; Andrea M Kasko; Paul S Weiss; Anne M Andrews
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 9.229

2.  Paper-based diagnostics in the antigen-depletion regime: High-density immobilization of rcSso7d-cellulose-binding domain fusion proteins for efficient target capture.

Authors:  Eric A Miller; Subha Baniya; Daniel Osorio; Yara Jabbour Al Maalouf; Hadley D Sikes
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  First characterization of a biphasic, switch-like DNA amplification.

Authors:  Burcu Özay; Cara M Robertus; Jackson L Negri; Stephanie E McCalla
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Phenylalanine Monitoring via Aptamer-Field-Effect Transistor Sensors.

Authors:  Kevin M Cheung; Kyung-Ae Yang; Nako Nakatsuka; Chuanzhen Zhao; Mao Ye; Michael E Jung; Hongyan Yang; Paul S Weiss; Milan N Stojanović; Anne M Andrews
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 7.711

Review 5.  Re-Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom about Binding Assays.

Authors:  Brandon D Wilson; H Tom Soh
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Silver Nanocubes as Electrochemical Labels for Bioassays.

Authors:  Yi Peng; Charlie Rabin; Charuksha T Walgama; Nicole E Pollok; Leilani Smith; Ian Richards; Richard M Crooks
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 7.711

7.  New insights into a classic aptamer: binding sites, cooperativity and more sensitive adenosine detection.

Authors:  Zijie Zhang; Olatunji Oni; Juewen Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Engineering synthetic RNA devices for cell control.

Authors:  Peter B Dykstra; Matias Kaplan; Christina D Smolke
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 59.581

9.  Nucleic acid detection using BRET-beacons based on bioluminescent protein-DNA hybrids.

Authors:  Wouter Engelen; Kayleigh M van de Wiel; Lenny H H Meijer; Bedabrata Saha; Maarten Merkx
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Allosteric DNA nanoswitches for controlled release of a molecular cargo triggered by biological inputs.

Authors:  Marianna Rossetti; Simona Ranallo; Andrea Idili; Giuseppe Palleschi; Alessandro Porchetta; Francesco Ricci
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.