Literature DB >> 27564409

Lesinurad Combined With Allopurinol: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Gout Patients With an Inadequate Response to Standard-of-Care Allopurinol (a US-Based Study).

Kenneth G Saag1, David Fitz-Patrick2, Jeff Kopicko3, Maple Fung3, Nihar Bhakta3, Scott Adler4, Chris Storgard3, Scott Baumgartner3, Michael A Becker5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor used for the treatment of gout in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. The Combining Lesinurad with Allopurinol Standard of Care in Inadequate Responders (CLEAR 1) study, a 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, was conducted to investigate daily lesinurad (200 mg or 400 mg orally) added to allopurinol versus placebo plus allopurinol in patients with serum urate (UA) levels above a target of <6.0 mg/dl.
METHODS: Patients receiving ≥300 mg of allopurinol (≥200 mg in those with moderate renal impairment) who had serum UA levels ≥6.5 mg/dl at screening and ≥2 gout flares during the previous year were studied. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a serum UA level of <6.0 mg/dl at month 6. Key secondary end points were the mean gout flare rate requiring treatment (months 7-12) and the proportions of patients with complete resolution of ≥1 target tophus (month 12). Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory data.
RESULTS: The study patients (n = 603) were predominantly male and had a mean ± SD age of 51.9 ± 11.3 years, a gout duration of 11.8 ± 9.4 years, a baseline serum UA level of 6.94 ± 1.27 mg/dl, and were receiving an allopurinol dosage of 306.6 ± 59.58 mg/day. Lesinurad at doses of 200 mg or 400 mg added to allopurinol therapy significantly increased the proportions of patients who achieved serum UA target levels by month 6 as compared with those receiving allopurinol alone (54.2%, 59.2%, and 27.9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Lesinurad was not significantly superior to allopurinol alone in terms of the secondary end points: rates of gout flares and complete resolution of tophi. Lesinurad was generally well-tolerated; the safety profile of the 200-mg dose was comparable to that of allopurinol alone, except for higher incidences of predominantly reversible elevations of serum creatinine levels.
CONCLUSION: Lesinurad added to allopurinol provided benefit as compared with allopurinol alone in reducing serum UA levels and represents a new treatment option for patients needing additional urate-lowering therapy.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27564409     DOI: 10.1002/art.39840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  44 in total

1.  Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patient with hyperuricemia and high cardiovascular risk: 2021 update.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz; Andrzej Tykarski; Krystyna Widecka; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  International position paper on the appropriate use of uricosurics with the introduction of lesinurad.

Authors:  Tim L Jansen; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Pascal Richette
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Lesinurad: A Review in Hyperuricaemia of Gout.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  What Is the Evidence for Treat-to-Target Serum Urate in Gout?

Authors:  David Bursill; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Febuxostat.

Authors:  Bishoy Kamel; Garry G Graham; Kenneth M Williams; Kevin D Pile; Richard O Day
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Treatment Options for Gout.

Authors:  Bettina Engel; Johannes Just; Markus Bleckwenn; Klaus Weckbecker
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Improvement in OMERACT domains and renal function with regular treatment for gout: a 12-month follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado; Ingris Peláez-Ballestas; Rubén Burgos-Vargas; Everardo Alvarez-Hernández; Sergio García-Méndez; Virginia Pascual-Ramos; Marina Rull-Gabayet
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Impact of non-adherence on the safety and efficacy of uric acid-lowering therapies in the treatment of gout.

Authors:  Daniel Hill-McManus; Elena Soto; Scott Marshall; Steven Lane; Dyfrig Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  New Perspectives in Rheumatology: Implications of the Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients With Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities Trial and the Associated Food and Drug Administration Public Safety Alert.

Authors:  Hyon Choi; Tuhina Neogi; Lisa Stamp; Nicola Dalbeth; Robert Terkeltaub
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 10.  Predicting Response or Non-response to Urate-Lowering Therapy in Patients with Gout.

Authors:  Garry G Graham; Sophie L Stocker; Diluk R W Kannangara; Richard O Day
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.