| Literature DB >> 27564116 |
Junnan Li1, Hongyu Xie1, Ang Li1, Jinlong Cheng2, Kai Yang1, Jingtao Wang1, Wenjie Wang1, Fan Zhang1, Zhenzi Li1, Harman S Dhillon3, Margarita S Openkova3, Xiaohua Zhou4, Kang Li1, Yan Hou1,5.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most deadly gynecologic malignancy worldwide due to its high recurrence rate after surgery and chemotherapy. There is a critical need for discovery of novel biomarkers for EOC recurrence providing higher prediction power than that of the present ones. Lipids have been reported to associate with development and progression of cancer. In the current study, we aim to identify and validate the lipids which were relevant to the ovarian cancer recurrence based on plasma lipidomics performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. In order to fulfill this objective, plasma from 70 EOC patients with follow up information was obtained. The results revealed that patients with and without recurrence could be clearly distinguished based on their lipid profiles. Thirty-one lipid metabolites were identified as potential biomarkers for EOC recurrence. The AUC value of these metabolite combinations for predicting EOC recurrence was 0.897. In terms of clinical applicability, LysoPG(20:5) arose as a potential EOC recurrence predictive biomarker to increase the predictive power of clinical predictors from AUC value 0.739 to 0.875. Additionally, we still found that individuals with early relapses (< 6 months) had a distinctive metabolomic pattern compared with late EOC and non-EOC recurrence subjects. Interestingly, decreased levels of triglycerides (TGs) were found to be a specific metabolic feature foreshadowing an early relapse. In conclusion, plasma lipidomics study could be used for predicting EOC recurrences, as well as early and late recurrent cases. The lipid biomarker research improves the predictive power of clinical predictors and the identified biomarkers are of great prognostic and therapeutic potential.Entities:
Keywords: early recurrence; epithelial ovarian cancer; lipidomics; recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27564116 PMCID: PMC5564526 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of EOC patients
| Characteristics | Recurrence ( | Non-recurrence ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER ( | LR ( | Total | |||
| Age | |||||
| < 50 | 7(58.33) | 8(29.63) | 15(38.46) | 12(38.71) | 0.9831 |
| ≥ 50 | 5(41.67) | 19(70.37) | 24(61.54) | 19(61.29) | |
| Serum CA-125 level | |||||
| < 35 | 1(8.33) | 0(0) | 1(2.56) | 6(19.35) | 0.0240* |
| ≥ 35 | 11(91.67) | 27(100) | 38(97.44) | 25(80.65) | |
| Greater Omentum metastasis | |||||
| Absent | 3(25.00) | 5(18.52) | 8(20.51) | 19(61.29) | 0.0007* |
| Present | 8(66.67) | 20(74.07) | 28(71.79) | 11(35.48) | |
| Undocumented | 1(8.33) | 2(7.41) | 3(7.70) | 1(3.23) | |
| FIGO stage | |||||
| I | 1(8.33) | 1(3.70) | 2(5.13) | 12(38.71) | 0.0033* |
| II | 0(0) | 3(11.11) | 3(7.69) | 3(9.68) | |
| III | 10(83.34) | 22(81.48) | 32(82.05) | 16(51.61) | |
| IV | 1(8.33) | 1(3.71) | 2(5.13) | 0(0) | |
| Histology differentiation | |||||
| Well | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 8(25.80) | 0.0015* |
| Moderately | 3(25.00) | 2(7.41) | 5(12.82) | 5(16.13) | |
| Poorly | 9(75.00) | 21(77.78) | 30(76.92) | 14(45.16) | |
| Undocumented | 0(0) | 4(14.81) | 4(10.26) | 4(12.90) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||||
| Absent | 7(58.33) | 18(66.67) | 25(64.10) | 29(93.55) | 0.0036* |
| Present | 5(41.67) | 9(33.33) | 14(25.90) | 2(6.55) | |
* statistically significance between recurrence in total and non-recurrence group;
Percentage in brackets is the column percent.
Figure 1(A) PLS-DA score plot distinguishing EOC recurrence from non-EOC recurrence (two latent variables with the performance of R2X = 0.364, R2Y = 0.701 and Q2 = 0.224); (B) Validation plot for discriminating between EOC recurrence and non-EOC recurrence with 200 permutations; (C) The scatter plot depicting the importance of metabolites in discriminating EOC recurrence from non-EOC recurrence; red dots represent down-regulation in EOC patients with recurrence, green dots represent up-regulation in EOC patients with recurrence; (D) The Z-score plot of differentiating metabolites between EOC recurrence and non-EOC recurrence. The values were standardized using mean centering and unit variance scaling of each variable.
Identified differential metabolites between with and without recurrent EOC
| ID | Lipid | MZ | rt (min) | ppm | FC | VIP | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LysoPC(P-15:0) | 466.3296 | 4.54 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 1.50E-05 | 1.34 | 0.792 |
| 2 | LysoPC(O-16:0) | 482.3592 | 2.91 | 2.60 | 0.70 | 0.0001 | 1.11 | 0.759 |
| 3 | LysoPC(18:1) | 522.3542 | 2.52 | 2.21 | 0.72 | 2.90E-05 | 1.08 | 0.783 |
| 4 | LysoPC(18:0) | 524.3717 | 3.85 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 0.0002 | 1.01 | 0.754 |
| 5 | LysoPG(20:5) | 531.2742 | 1.64 | 4.53 | 0.69 | 0.0006 | 3.05 | 0.736 |
| 6 | LysoPC(20:3) | 546.353 | 3.85 | 4.48 | 0.73 | 0.0001 | 1.01 | 0.763 |
| 7 | LysoPC(22:6) | 568.3387 | 2.08 | 1.96 | 0.71 | 1.22E-06 | 1.39 | 0.824 |
| 8 | Cer(d18:1/23:0) | 636.6274 | 18.58 | 2.28 | 0.81 | 0.0137 | 1.08 | 0.672 |
| 9 | SM(d18:2/14:0) | 673.5263 | 10.91 | 2.43 | 0.73 | 0.0024 | 1.05 | 0.71 |
| 10 | SM(d18:1/14:0) | 675.5436 | 12.62 | 0.02 | 0.76 | 0.0002 | 1.01 | 0.757 |
| 11 | PC(31:2) | 716.5254 | 15.14 | 4.09 | 1.25 | 0.0290 | 1.94 | 0.653 |
| 12 | PC(P-34:4) | 738.5461 | 13.25 | 3.90 | 0.71 | 3.92E-06 | 1.52 | 0.81 |
| 13 | PC(34:4) | 754.5385 | 13.55 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.0308 | 1.28 | 0.651 |
| 14 | PC(P-36:3) | 768.591 | 15.36 | 1.05 | 0.88 | 0.0256 | 1.08 | 0.656 |
| 15 | PE(P-40:6) | 776.5617 | 16.16 | 3.55 | 0.71 | 0.0017 | 1.73 | 0.717 |
| 16 | PC(36:3) | 784.5864 | 16.45 | 1.60 | 0.93 | 0.0403 | 1.45 | 0.644 |
| 17 | PC(36:1) | 788.6185 | 16.53 | 2.61 | 0.87 | 0.0147 | 1.11 | 0.67 |
| 18 | PC(38:6) | 806.5688 | 13.98 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.0025 | 1.03 | 0.709 |
| 19 | PE(P-42:4) | 808.624 | 16.94 | 3.09 | 1.04 | 0.0358 | 1.01 | 0.647 |
| 20 | PC(38:4) | 810.6009 | 16.53 | 0.06 | 0.87 | 0.0137 | 1.08 | 0.672 |
| 21 | PC(38:3) | 812.6174 | 16.11 | 1.20 | 0.80 | 0.0256 | 1.01 | 0.656 |
| 22 | PC(38:2) | 814.6357 | 16.69 | 4.42 | 0.79 | 0.0039 | 1.01 | 0.7 |
| 23 | PC(P-40:6) | 818.6053 | 14.89 | 0.60 | 0.86 | 0.0358 | 1.14 | 0.647 |
| 24 | PG(39:1) | 819.6087 | 16.32 | 2.80 | 0.89 | 0.0465 | 1.04 | 0.639 |
| 25 | PC(40:5) | 836.615 | 16.70 | 1.66 | 0.87 | 0.0174 | 1.61 | 0.666 |
| 26 | PC(42:11) | 852.5512 | 13.84 | 3.00 | 0.78 | 0.0008 | 1.13 | 0.731 |
| 27 | LacCer(d18:1/16:0) | 862.6208 | 14.26 | 4.91 | 0.84 | 0.0060 | 1.05 | 0.691 |
| 28 | PS(32:6) | 878.5878 | 16.54 | 3.23 | 0.90 | 0.0218 | 1.04 | 0.66 |
| 29 | PI(40:9) | 905.5171 | 13.60 | 0.46 | 0.84 | 0.0186 | 1.03 | 0.664 |
| 30 | PI(42:9) | 909.5477 | 14.75 | 1.21 | 0.66 | 0.0097 | 1.12 | 0.68 |
| 31 | PI(40:7) | 933.5453 | 14.62 | 3.71 | 0.74 | 0.0021 | 1.27 | 0.712 |
MZ mass-to-charge ratio, rt retention time, ppm parts per million, FC fold change, VIP variable important in projection.
Figure 2(A) ROC curves based on the random forest model with leave-one-out cross-validation for prediction with 31 candidate lipid biomarkers; (B) The inclusion of LysoPG(20:5) level to related prognostic clinical characteristics including serum CA-125 level, omentum metastasis, FIGO stage, histology differentiation grade and lymph node metastasis to receiver operating characteristic curve increase the predictive power of EOC recurrence (area: clinical characteristics: 0.739, P < 0.01(blue line); LysoPG(20:5): 0.736, P < 0.001 (red line); clinical characteristics + LysoPG(20:5): 0.875, P < 0.001(green line)); (C) Kaplan–Meier curve comparing EOC recurrence with lower LysoPG(20:5) values (blue line) and higher LysoPG(20:5) values (green line).
Figure 3(A) PLS-DA score plot for discriminating early and late EOC recurrence; (B) Validation plot for discriminating early and late recurrent EOC patients with 200 permutations; (C) PLS-DA score plot for discriminating early and non-EOC recurrence; (D) Validation plot for discriminating early and non-EOC recurrence. ER: early recurrence; LR: late recurrence; NR: non-recurrence.
Figure 4Changing patterns of differential metabolites from non-EOC recurrence across late recurrence and early recurrence
(A) Significant alterations in early recurrence compared to late relapse and non-recurrence, but no difference among late and non-recurrence; (B) Significant alterations in non-recurrence compared to early and late recurrence, but no difference among early and late recurrence. ER: early recurrence; LR: late recurrence; NR: non-recurrence.
Figure 5Correlation network of differential lipids between patients with and without EOC recurrence related metabolites (Pearson correlation analysis, |r| > 0.6) are connected with a line