| Literature DB >> 27563482 |
Chandra Shekher Sanwal1, Raj Kumar2, S D Bhardwaj3.
Abstract
The integration of Andrographis paniculata under Pinus roxburghii (Chir pine) plantation has been studied to evaluate the growth and yield for its economic viability and conservation. It was grown on three topographical aspects, namely, northern, north-western, and western, at a spacing of 30 cm × 30 cm, followed by three tillage depths, namely, minimum (0 cm), medium (up to 10 cm), and deep (up to 15 cm) tillage. The growth parameters, namely, plant height and number of branches per plant, were recorded as significantly higher on western aspect and lowest on northern aspect except for leaf area index which was found nonsignificant. However under all tillage practices all the growth parameters in both understorey and open conditions were found to be nonsignificant except for plant height which was found to be significantly highest under deep tillage and lowest under minimum tillage. The study of net returns for Andrographis paniculata revealed that it had positive average annual returns even in understorey conditions which indicate its possible economic viability under integration of Chir pine plantations. Hence net returns can be enhanced by integrating Andrographis paniculata and this silvimedicinal system can be suggested which will help utilizing an unutilized part of land and increase total productivity from such lands besides conservation of the A. paniculata in situ.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27563482 PMCID: PMC4983664 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2049532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-908X
Height, diameter, and crown area of Pinus roxburghii in the study area.
| Aspect | Average height (m) | Average diameter (cm) | Crown area (m2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1: northern aspect | 11.23 | 19.94 | 2.99 |
| A2: north-western aspect | 10.22 | 18.15 | 2.87 |
| A3: western aspect | 11.09 | 19.39 | 2.98 |
Effect of aspect on plant height, number of branches per plant, and LAI of Andrographis paniculata in understorey and open conditions.
| Aspect | Plant height (cm) | Number of branches per plant | Leaf area index (LAI) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetative stage | Prebloom stage | Harvesting stage | Prebloom stage | Harvesting stage | Prebloom stage | Harvesting stage | |||||||||||||||
| Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | |
| A1: northern | 21.70 | 24.34 | 23.02a | 37.88 | 40.61 | 39.24a | 43.33 | 46.29 | 44.81c | 7.75 | 8.59 | 8.17c | 13.06 | 14.03 | 13.54b | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.29c | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.45c |
| A2: north-western | 22.55 | 25.42 | 23.98a | 39.63 | 42.37 | 41.00a | 44.30 | 48.56 | 46.43b | 8.83 | 9.82 | 9.32b | 14.13 | 15.57 | 14.85ba | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.30b | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.47b |
| A3: western | 23.97 | 26.43 | 25.20a | 41.31 | 44.12 | 42.71a | 46.32 | 51.22 | 48.77a | 9.90 | 10.89 | 10.39a | 15.58 | 16.78 | 16.18a | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.31a | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49a |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Mean | 22.74b | 25.40a | 39.61b | 42.37a | 44.65b | 48.36a | 8.83b | 9.77a | 14.26b | 15.46a | 0.30b | 0.31a | 0.47b | 0.48a | |||||||
Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Effect of tillage practices on height, number of branches per plant, and LAI of Andrographis paniculata in understorey and open conditions.
| Tillage | Plant height (cm) | Number of branches per plant | Leaf area index (LAI) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetative stage | Prebloom stage | Harvesting stage | Prebloom stage | Harvesting stage | Prebloom stage | Harvesting stage | |||||||||||||||
| Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | |
| T1: minimum | 18.73 | 20.83 | 19.78c | 35.75 | 38.86 | 37.30a | 40.42 | 43.89 | 42.15c | 7.05 | 7.26 | 7.15c | 12.52 | 13.82 | 13.17a | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.28a | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.45c |
| T2: medium | 24.30 | 27.08 | 25.69b | 40.13 | 42.38 | 41.25a | 44.49 | 47.84 | 46.16b | 9.09 | 10.07 | 9.58b | 14.65 | 15.72 | 15.18a | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.30a | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.47b |
| T3: deep | 25.19 | 28.28 | 26.73a | 42.94 | 45.86 | 44.40a | 49.04 | 53.34 | 51.19a | 10.13 | 11.26 | 10.69a | 15.61 | 16.83 | 16.22a | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.31a | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.48a |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Mean | 22.74b | 25.40a | 39.61b | 42.37a | 44.65b | 48.36a | 8.83b | 9.77a | 14.26b | 15.46a | 0.30b | 0.31a | 0.47b | 0.48a | |||||||
Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Effect of aspect on biomass and yield (t/ha) of Andrographis paniculata in understorey and open conditions.
| Aspect | Above ground fresh weight (t/ha) | Above ground dry weight (t/ha) | Below ground fresh weight (t/ha) | Below ground dry weight (t/ha) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | |
| A1: northern | 1.00 | 1.26 | 1.13a | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.62a | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.17a | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.10a |
| A2: north-western | 1.16 | 1.39 | 1.27a | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.68a | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.20a | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.11a |
| A3: western | 1.51 | 1.72 | 1.62a | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.86a | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.25a | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14a |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Mean | 1.23b | 1.45a | 0.67b | 0.77a | 0.19b | 0.22a | 0.11b | 0.13a | ||||
Effect of tillage practices on biomass and yield (t/ha) of Andrographis paniculata in understorey and open conditions.
| Aspect | Above ground fresh weight (t/ha) | Above ground dry weight (t/ha) | Below ground fresh weight (t/ha) | Below ground dry weight (t/ha) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | Understorey | Open | Mean | |
| T1: minimum | 1.00 | 1.20 | 1.10a | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.59a | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.17a | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10a |
| T2: medium | 1.24 | 1.48 | 1.36a | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.73a | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.21a | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.12a |
| T3: deep | 1.44 | 1.69 | 1.56a | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.84a | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.24a | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.14a |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Mean | 1.23b | 1.45a | 0.67b | 0.77a | 0.19b | 0.22a | 0.11b | 0.13a | ||||
Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Bioeconomic appraisal of Andrographis paniculata.
| Treatment combinations |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross return | Cost of cultivation | Net return | |
| A1T1S1 | 186.28 | 118.92 | 67.37 |
| A1T2S1 | 214.93 | 137.23 | 77.68 |
| A1T3S1 | 253.18 | 147.20 | 105.98 |
| A1T1S0 | 176.40 | 135.83 | 40.57 |
| A1T2S0 | 200.25 | 151.88 | 48.37 |
| A1T3S0 | 237.90 | 168.97 | 68.93 |
| A2T1S1 | 193.55 | 127.72 | 65.83 |
| A2T2S1 | 234.65 | 145.62 | 89.03 |
| A2T3s1 | 258.35 | 161.70 | 96.65 |
| A2T1S0 | 180.45 | 145.37 | 35.08 |
| A2T2S0 | 223.50 | 161.77 | 61.73 |
| A2T3S0 | 256.50 | 179.03 | 77.47 |
| A3T1S1 | 242.05 | 144.83 | 97.22 |
| A3T2S1 | 293.35 | 158.28 | 135.07 |
| A3T3S1 | 329.65 | 177.15 | 152.50 |
| A3T1S0 | 219.30 | 160.38 | 58.92 |
| A3T2S0 | 285.00 | 179.60 | 105.40 |
| A3T3S0 | 316.65 | 199.53 | 117.12 |
Note: one US dollar is equivalent to 60 Indian rupees.
A1: northern aspect; A2: north-western aspect; A3: western aspect.
T1: minimum tillage; T2: medium tillage; T3: deep tillage.
S1: understorey; S0: open.