| Literature DB >> 27563462 |
Mary Jane L Cortez1, Christian V Del Rosario2, Michael Joseph S Diño2.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study utilized a nested concurrent design to determine the association of Filipino nurse returnees' length of stay since they returned and their social connectedness as well as the essence of communication from their perspective. The respondents, who are Filipino nurses (n = 107) who worked abroad and returned to the Philippines for good, were employed from June to July of 2015 via referrals from colleges and institutions in Metro Manila and Bulacan areas in the Philippines. The quantitative results revealed, in one hand, significant but weak correlation between the respondent's length of stay and social connectedness (r = 0.224, p = 0.021, α = 0.05). On the other hand, three themes were generated from the qualitative analysis, namely, (1) Taking-In, (2) Taking-Hold, and (3) Letting-Go. The Social Connection System (SCS) provides a visual depiction of the social connectedness of a person. This research is geared towards the understanding of the interesting phenomenon of migration and social coherence of Filipino professionals.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27563462 PMCID: PMC4985577 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9187536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Res Pract ISSN: 2090-1429
Demographic profile of the respondents (n = 107).
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 86 | 80.4 |
| Male | 20 | 18.7 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 66 | 61.7 |
| Separated | 8 | 7.5 |
| Single | 31 | 29 |
| Widow | 2 | 1.9 |
| Number of children | ||
| 0 | 36 | 33.6 |
| 1–3 | 65 | 60.7 |
| 4–7 | 6 | 5.6 |
| Current employment | ||
| Full time | 98 | 91.6 |
| Part time | 8 | 7.5 |
| No response | 1 | 0.9 |
| Type of company | ||
| Private | 78 | 72.9 |
| Public | 29 | 27.1 |
| Area of practice | ||
| Hospital | 73 | 68.2 |
| School | 34 | 31.8 |
| Current position | ||
| AVP NDIV | 1 | 0.9 |
| Chief nurse | 2 | 1.9 |
| Dean | 3 | 2.8 |
| Manager | 20 | 18.7 |
| Staff | 78 | 72.9 |
| Training officer | 2 | 1.9 |
| Salary | ||
| 15,000–30,000 | 74 | 69.2 |
| 31,000–45,000 | 22 | 20.6 |
| 46,000–60,000 | 6 | 5.6 |
| 61,000 & above | 5 | 4.7 |
Gathered in June to July 2015 from various areas in Metro Manila and Bulacan, Philippines.
Mean scores of respondents' social connectedness (n = 107).
| Mean | SD | Interpretation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) I feel at ease in the presence of outsiders. | 4.61 | 1.09 | Agree |
| (2) I am accustomed with the community where I work and live with. | 4.99 | 0.69 | Agree |
| (3) I have not developed personal attachment outside my family since I returned from abroad. | 4.47 | 1.19 | Slightly Agree |
| (4) I have readjusted well upon return. | 4.89 | 0.94 | Agree |
| (5) I feel a sense of belongingness to those around me. | 4.85 | 0.94 | Agree |
| (6) I feel detached from the community where I live and work. | 4.49 | 1.21 | Slightly Agree |
| (7) I have not developed close attachment even with my own family. | 4.93 | 1.03 | Agree |
| (8) I view people as pleasant and open-minded. | 4.79 | 1.03 | Agree |
| (9) I feel like a stranger ( | 4.87 | 1.05 | Agree |
| (10) I feel appreciated by those around me. | 4.70 | 0.91 | Agree |
| (11) I feel isolated from those around me. | 4.81 | 1.11 | Agree |
| (12) I am able to connect with my peers. | 4.88 | 0.93 | Agree |
| (13) I do not feel that I am accepted by my peers. | 4.72 | 1.12 | Agree |
| (14) I am much concerned with the welfare of others. | 4.75 | 0.95 | Agree |
| (15) I find myself less attached with my community. | 4.42 | 1.21 | Slightly Agree |
| (16) I am able to relate with other people. | 4.93 | 0.92 | Agree |
| (17) I view myself as an outsider since my return. | 4.73 | 1.11 | Agree |
| (18) I do not feel an attachment to others. | 4.61 | 1.19 | Agree |
| (19) I consider my friends as family. | 4.96 | 0.93 | Agree |
| (20) I sense a lack of connectedness with others. | 4.65 | 1.10 | Agree |
| Overall | 4.75 | 0.63 | Agree |
Strongly Disagree 1–1.49; Slightly Disagree 1.5–2.49; Disagree 2.5–3.49; Slightly Agree 3.5–4.49; Agree 4.5–5.49; and Strongly Agree 5.5–6.0.
Reversed scoring.
Relationship between length of stay and social connectedness (n = 107).
|
|
| Association | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length of return | 0.224 | 0.021 | Weak |
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
Based on correlation interpretation by Evans [40].
Figure 1Resulted association between the quantitative variables.
Figure 2Social Connection System.
Emerged themes and description.
| Themes | Description |
|---|---|
| Taking-In | Intrapersonal connectedness characterized by sense of worth, gradual feeling of belongingness, fulfillment of skills, financial security, and overall satisfaction |
|
| |
| Taking-Hold | Connection between the person and others portrayed by sense of coherence with peers, acceptance from the family, and service to community |
|
| |
| Letting-Go | Expected events that did not occur, resulting in discordance between family members and detachment from the community |