G Yerlikaya1, R Akolekar1,2, K McPherson1, A Syngelaki1, K H Nicolaides1. 1. Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK. 2. Department of Fetal Medicine, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop a model for prediction of stillbirth based on maternal characteristics and components of medical history and to evaluate the performance of screening with this model for all stillbirths and those due to impaired placentation and to unexplained causes. METHODS: This was a prospective screening study of 113 415 singleton pregnancies at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and at 19 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks. The study population included 113 019 live births and 396 (0.35%) antepartum stillbirths; 230 (58%) were secondary to impaired placentation and 166 (42%) were due to other or unexplained causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors from maternal characteristics and medical history which provided a significant contribution to the prediction of stillbirth. RESULTS: The risk for stillbirth increased with maternal weight (odds ratio (OR), 1.01 per kg above 69 kg), was higher in women of Afro-Caribbean racial origin (OR, 2.01), those with assisted conception (OR, 1.79), cigarette smokers (OR, 1.71), and in those with a history of chronic hypertension (OR, 2.62), systemic lupus erythematosus/antiphospholipid syndrome (OR, 3.61) or diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.55) and was increased in women with a history of previous stillbirth (OR, 4.81). Screening with the model predicted 26% of unexplained stillbirths and 31% of those due to impaired placentation, at a false-positive rate of 10%; within the impaired-placentation group the detection rate of stillbirth < 32 weeks' gestation was higher than that of stillbirth ≥ 37 weeks (38% vs 28%). CONCLUSIONS: A model based on maternal characteristics and medical history recorded in early pregnancy can potentially predict one-third of subsequent stillbirths. The extent to which such stillbirths could be prevented remains to be determined.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a model for prediction of stillbirth based on maternal characteristics and components of medical history and to evaluate the performance of screening with this model for all stillbirths and those due to impaired placentation and to unexplained causes. METHODS: This was a prospective screening study of 113 415 singleton pregnancies at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and at 19 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks. The study population included 113 019 live births and 396 (0.35%) antepartum stillbirths; 230 (58%) were secondary to impaired placentation and 166 (42%) were due to other or unexplained causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors from maternal characteristics and medical history which provided a significant contribution to the prediction of stillbirth. RESULTS: The risk for stillbirth increased with maternal weight (odds ratio (OR), 1.01 per kg above 69 kg), was higher in women of Afro-Caribbean racial origin (OR, 2.01), those with assisted conception (OR, 1.79), cigarette smokers (OR, 1.71), and in those with a history of chronic hypertension (OR, 2.62), systemic lupus erythematosus/antiphospholipid syndrome (OR, 3.61) or diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.55) and was increased in women with a history of previous stillbirth (OR, 4.81). Screening with the model predicted 26% of unexplained stillbirths and 31% of those due to impaired placentation, at a false-positive rate of 10%; within the impaired-placentation group the detection rate of stillbirth < 32 weeks' gestation was higher than that of stillbirth ≥ 37 weeks (38% vs 28%). CONCLUSIONS: A model based on maternal characteristics and medical history recorded in early pregnancy can potentially predict one-third of subsequent stillbirths. The extent to which such stillbirths could be prevented remains to be determined.
Authors: Liona C Poon; Andrew Shennan; Jonathan A Hyett; Anil Kapur; Eran Hadar; Hema Divakar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Peter von Dadelszen; Harold David McIntyre; Anne B Kihara; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Roberto Romero; Mary D'Alton; Vincenzo Berghella; Kypros H Nicolaides; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Amanda S Trudell; Methodius G Tuuli; Graham A Colditz; George A Macones; Anthony O Odibo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joanna Gent; Sian Bullough; Jane Harrold; Richard Jackson; Kerry Woolfall; Lazaros Andronis; Louise Kenny; Christine Cornforth; Alexander E P Heazell; Emily Benbow; Zarko Alfirevic; Andrew Sharp Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-11-19
Authors: Tao Xiong; Yi Mu; Juan Liang; Jun Zhu; Xiaohong Li; Jinke Li; Zheng Liu; Yi Qu; Yanping Wang; Dezhi Mu Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 9.408