Literature DB >> 2756047

Operant conditioning of response variability in male and female Wistar rats.

A van Hest1, F van Haaren, N E van de Poll.   

Abstract

It has previously been suggested that some of the behavioral differences between the sexes in food motivated operant procedures may be a function of the fact that males are more likely than females to exhibit stereotyped behavior. If such is the case, then it might be expected that behavioral variability is more easily conditioned in females than in males. The present experiment was designed to investigate this notion. Male and female Wistar rats were trained to respond in a procedure in which response variability was explicitly reinforced. In this procedure subjects had continuous access to two response levers in the experimental chamber. In the first experimental condition, each sequence of four responses was followed by the presentation of a food pellet, if the sequence differed from the two sequences which preceded it (Lag 2). Time-out was presented when such was not the case. During time-out the levers were retracted from the chamber and all stimulus lights were extinguished for 4 sec. In subsequent experimental conditions, subjects had to produce four-response sequences which differed from the preceding four, eight and sixteen sequences respectively (Lag 4, 8, 16). Response sequences were classified by the number of switches between levers. Behavioral variability increased as the lag requirement was increased, showing that variability is a conditionable dimension of behavior. Differences between males and females were however not observed. These results thus contradict the previously reported finding that males exhibit more behavioral stereotypy than females. It is suggested that procedural variables may account for these seemingly contradictory findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2756047     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90072-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

Review 1.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Behavioral variability and frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A runs-test algorithm: contingent reinforcement and response run structures.

Authors:  Yosuke Hachiga; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan D Ward; Christopher A Barnes; K Anne Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule.

Authors:  L Cohen; A Neuringer; D Rhodes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of alcohol on reinforced repetitions and reinforced variations in rats.

Authors:  E McElroy; A Neuringer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Increasing the variability of response sequences in pigeons by adjusting the frequency of switching between two keys.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.