| Literature DB >> 27559216 |
John R Graham1, Micheal L Shier2, David Nicholas3.
Abstract
Workplace expectations reflect an important consideration in employee experience. A higher prevalence of workplace congruence between worker and employer expectations has been associated with higher levels of productivity and overall workplace satisfaction across multiple occupational groups. Little research has investigated the relationship between workplace congruence and occupational health outcomes among social service workers. This study sought to better understand the extent to which occupational congruence contributes to occupational outcomes by surveying unionised social service workers (n = 674) employed with the Government of Alberta, Canada. Multiple regression analysis shows that greater congruence between workplace and worker expectations around workloads, workplace values and the quality of the work environment significantly: (i) decreases symptoms related to distress and secondary traumatic stress; (ii) decreases intentions to leave; and (iii) increases overall life satisfaction. The findings provide some evidence of areas within the workplace of large government run social welfare programmes that can be better aligned to worker expectations to improve occupational outcomes among social service workers.Entities:
Keywords: Occupational health; organisation; social services; social work; stress; well-being; workplace
Year: 2015 PMID: 27559216 PMCID: PMC4986077 DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Soc Work ISSN: 0045-3102
Demographic control variables
| Variable | Categories/score range |
|---|---|
| Gender (categorical) | Male |
| Female | |
| Age (continuous) | Self-report of exact age |
| Marital status (categorical) | Presently Married/common-law |
| Not presently married/common-law | |
| Number of children (continuous) | Exact number of children under 18 residing with respondent |
| Years of practice (continuous) | Number of years respondent worked in the human services |
| Education (continuous) | Diploma |
| Bachelor's | |
| Masters's | |
| Ph.D. | |
| Work area (categorical) | Child welfare worker |
| Other government agency | |
| Work setting (categorical) | Government office |
| Other work setting |
Descriptive statistics of study participants: demographic variables (n = 674)
| Variable (code value) | Frequency (%) | Mean (sd) |
|---|---|---|
| Female (0) | 584 (86.65) | |
| Male (1) | 90 (13.35) | |
| Age | 42.91 (10.48) | |
| Divorced/single/widowed (0) | 196 (29.08) | |
| Married/common-law (1) | 478 (70.92) | |
| 0.78 (1.06) | ||
| 0 | 411 (60.98) | |
| 1 | 110 (16.32) | |
| 2 | 112 (16.62) | |
| 3 | 35 (5.19) | |
| 4 | 4 (0.06) | |
| 5 | 2 (0.03) | |
| Years of practice | 9.45 (8.13) | |
| Diploma (1) | 195 (28.93) | |
| Bachelor's (2) | 415 (61.57) | |
| Master's (3) | 62 (9.20) | |
| Ph.D. (4) | 2 (0.30) | |
| Not children and youth services (0) | 186 (27.60) | |
| Children and youth services (1) | 488 (72.40) | |
| Non-government office (0) | 79 (11.72) | |
| Government office (1) | 595 (88.28) |
Descriptive statistics of workplace congruence factors
| Variable (code value) | Mean (sd) | Cronbach's alpha |
|---|---|---|
| Workload | 0.93 (0.85) | 0.83 |
| Control | 1.73 (0.93) | 0.82 |
| Reward | 1.85 (0.97) | 0.84 |
| Community | 2.18 (0.93) | 0.88 |
| Fairness | 1.42 (0.88) | 0.83 |
| Values | 1.91 (0.90) | 0.78 |
Descriptive statistics of occupational outcome indicators: psychological distress, secondary traumatic stress, intention to leave and life satisfaction
| Variable | Mean (sd) | Cronbach's alpha |
|---|---|---|
| Psychological distress | 15.74 (4.89) | 0.93 |
| Secondary traumatic stress | 1.63 (0.94) | 0.90 |
| Intention to leave | 1.60 (1.11) | 0.82 |
| Life satisfaction | 4.31 (1.48) | 0.92 |
Multiple regression predictors of psychological distress, secondary traumatic stress, life satisfaction and intention to leave
| Predictors entered | GSI | STSS | SWLS | Intention to leave |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | β | β | β | |
| Gendera | 2.305 | 0.169 | −0.439** | 0.240* |
| Age | 0.109* | 0.000 | −0.009 | −0.013** |
| Marital statusb | −1.792 | −0.009 | 0.594*** | 0.136 |
| Number of children | 0.025 | −0.001 | 0.097* | −0.044 |
| Years of practice | 0.017 | −0.004 | 0.008 | −0.004 |
| Education | −0.485 | −0.136** | 0.166* | 0.174** |
| Work areac | −1.435 | 0.106 | 0.334** | −0.248** |
| Work settingd | −1.079 | 0.027 | 0.019 | −0.080 |
| Workload | −3.622*** | −0.383*** | 0.199** | −0.144** |
| Control | −1.357* | −0.080 | 0.184* | −0.255*** |
| Reward | −0.004 | −0.070 | 0.021 | −0.031 |
| Community/work environment | −2.057** | −0.124** | 0.172** | −0.105* |
| Fairness | −0.735 | 0.015 | 0.142 | −0.083 |
| Value congruence | −1.700** | −0.151*** | 0.247*** | −0.225*** |
| 0.222 | 0.333 | 0.253 | 0.264 |
β, unstandardised coefficients; areference category is male; breference category is single not married; creference category is other than child welfare; d reference category is non-government office; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
GSI, General Severity Index; STSS, Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale; SWLS, Satisfaction with Life Scale.