Literature DB >> 22658625

Formulation of work stress in 1960-2000: analysis of scientific works from the perspective of historical sociology.

Ari Väänänen1, Erkko Anttila, Jussi Turtiainen, Pekka Varje.   

Abstract

During the latter part of the 20th century, work stress became an important societal issue and a huge amount of scientific attention went to studying it. This paper examines the process of formulating and defining the concept of work stress in the occupational health sciences and in industrial and organizational psychology from the early 1960s to the late 1990s. The empirical material of the study encompasses 108 scientific articles, books, book chapters, 'state of the art' reviews, book reviews, and written conference presentations. The data are analysed in the frameworks of historical sociology, critical psychology, and the anthropology of knowledge. We argue that work stress as a life-structuring concept gained ground in psychosocial and occupational health sciences (and also in lay understanding) in the 1960s simultaneously with the rise of social reformist movements that called for fundamental changes emphasizing democratic and human-orientated work organizations and socially responsible values. With the passing of time, however, the focus on structural improvement of work life waned and the emphasis shifted towards the apolitical occupational health aspects of work stress. Researchers with a psychological orientation emphasized micro-level characteristics as factors affecting work stress, whereas stress-orientated epidemiologists turned to the study of specific occupational stress models and/or risk factors. The emergence and development of work stress research can be seen as a chain of attempts to define and identify new risks and experiences occurring in work life. The process, driven by a gradual shift from industrial environments towards organizational frameworks characterized by social and psychological dimensions, reflected the overall shift towards modern democratic work life and the information society in which employees' emotions and well-being became an issue.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22658625     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Pain-Contingent Interruption and Resumption of Work Goals: A Within-Day Diary Analysis.

Authors:  Morris Okun; Paul Karoly; Chung Jung Mun; Hanjoe Kim
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  A psychosocial theory of sick leave put to the test in the European Working Conditions Survey 2010-2015.

Authors:  Diego Montano
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Workplace Congruence and Occupational Outcomes among Social Service Workers.

Authors:  John R Graham; Micheal L Shier; David Nicholas
Journal:  Br J Soc Work       Date:  2015-01-28

4.  Psychological Distress in South African Healthcare Workers Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Associations and Mitigating Factors.

Authors:  Hsin-Ling Lee; Kerry S Wilson; Colleen Bernstein; Nisha Naicker; Annalee Yassi; Jerry M Spiegel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  The Lund University Checklist for Incipient Exhaustion: a prospective validation of the onset of sustained stress and exhaustion warnings.

Authors:  Kai Österberg; Roger Persson; Njördur Viborg; Peter Jönsson; Artur Tenenbaum
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  The Stressed Executive: Sources and Predictors of Stress Among Participants in an Executive Health Program.

Authors:  Ravindra Ganesh; Saswati Mahapatra; Debbie L Fuehrer; Levi J Folkert; Whitney A Jack; Sarah M Jenkins; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; Amit Sood
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2018-10-17

7.  Effects of a work-related stress model based mental health promotion program on job stress, stress reactions and coping profiles of women workers: a control groups study.

Authors:  Ozlem Koseoglu Ornek; Melek Nihal Esin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.