| Literature DB >> 27558833 |
Hsueh-Ching Wang1, Guanglong Tian2, Chih-Yu Chiu1.
Abstract
Bamboo, which has dense culms and root rhizome systems, can alter soil properties when it invades adjacent forests. Therefore, this study investigated whether bamboo invasions can cause changes in soil organic matter (SOM) composition and soil humification. We combined solid-state (13)C NMR spectroscopy and chemical analysis to examine the SOM in a Japanese cedar (Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27558833 PMCID: PMC4997307 DOI: 10.1038/srep32211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Average slope, soil texture, pH, organic C (Org. C), total N (TN), C:N ratio (C/N), and ∆logK of humic acids in the surface soil (0–10 cm) per vegetation type ± standard error (n = 6).
| Vegetation type | Soil texture (%) | pH (H2O) | Org. C (%) | TN (%) | C/N | ∆logK | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope (%) | Sand | Silt | Clay | ||||||
| Japanese cedar | 20 | 24.7 | 35 | 40.7 | 3.36 ± 0.05 b | 21.5 ± 1.46 a | 1.33 ± 0.07 a | 16.1 ± 0.39 a | 0.82 ± 0.007 a |
| Transition zone | 21 | 31 | 35 | 34.2 | 4.38 ± 0.25 a | 9.36 ± 0.93 b | 0.61 ± 0.10 b | 10.9 ± 0.57 b | 0.66 ± 0.004 b |
| Bamboo | 10 | 33.7 | 38 | 28.1 | 4.13 ± 0.05 a | 8.00 ± 0.40 b | 0.67 ± 0.03 b | 12.0 ± 0.33 b | 0.61 ± 0.003 c |
| 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
The different letters indicate significant differences per soil variable between the vegetation types according to Tukey’s HSD comparisons at p = 0.05, and the bottom row represents the p-value of the one-way ANOVA results.
Figure 1The solid state CP-MAS 13C NMR spectra of humid acids in surface soil in the Japanese cedar plantation (JCD), the transition zone (TR), and the bamboo plantation (BM).
The chemical shift regions are: 0–50 ppm (alkyl-C), 50–90 ppm (O-alkyl-C), 90–110 ppm (Di-O-alkyl-C), 110–165 ppm (aromatic-C) and 165–190 ppm (Carboxyl-C).
The proportions of NMR C functional groups of humic acids in surface soil (0–10cm) per vegetation type ± standard error (n = 3).
| Vegetation | Carbon functional groups (%) | A/O-A ratio | aromaticity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkyl-C | O-alkyl-C | Di-O-alkyl-C | Aromatic-C | Carboxyl-C | |||
| Litter | |||||||
| Japanese cedar | 24.0 ± 0.34 a | 45.3 ± 0.71 b | 9.85 ± 0.32 b | 16.1 ± 0.56 a | 4.82 ± 0.16 | 0.43 ± 0.01 a | 16.9 ± 0.61 a |
| Transition | 22.4 ± 0.59 a | 46.3 ± 0.76 b | 9.88 ± 0.25 b | 16.5 ± 0.50 a | 4.99 ± 0.10 | 0.40 ± 0.02 a | 17.3 ± 0.51 a |
| Bamboo | 13.2 ± 0.33 b | 56.5 ± 0.53 a | 12.9 ± 0.17 a | 12.6 ± 0.52 b | 4.83 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.00 b | 13.2 ± 0.57 b |
| | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.690 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Soil | |||||||
| Japanese cedar | 36.6 ± 0.70 | 29.7 ± 0.73 b | 6.01 ± 0.22 | 18.2 ± 0.35 a | 9.51 ± 0.01 b | 1.03 ± 0.05 | 20.1 ± 0.39 a |
| Transition | 35.8 ± 1.12 | 31.1 ± 0.55 ab | 5.84 ± 0.15 | 16.2 ± 0.33 b | 11.0 ± 0.29 a | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 18.3 ± 0.43 b |
| Bamboo | 33.8 ± 0.41 | 33.3 0.04 a | 5.84 ± 0.03 | 16.2 ± 0.38 b | 10.9 ± 0.18 a | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 18.1 ± 0.42 b |
| | 0.105 | 0.008 | 0.679 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 0.063 | 0.026 |
The different letters indicate significant differences per variable between the vegetation types according to Tukey’s HSD comparisons at p = 0.05, and the bottom row represents the p-value of the one-way ANOVA results.
The labile C pool I (LPI-C) and II (LPII-C), the recalcitrant C pool (RP-C), and the ratios of these SOC pools to total C per vegetation type ± standard error (n = 6).
| Elevation | LPI-C (g C kg−1) | LPII-C (g C kg−1) | RP-C (g C kg−1) | LPI-C/TC | LPII-C/TC | RP-C/TC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japanese cedar | 58.9 ± 3.3 a | 20.5 ± 2.2 a | 187.8 ± 8.3 a | 0.277 ± 0.014 b | 0.095 ± 0.006 b | 0.88 ± 0.026 a |
| Transition | 41.5 ± 3.0 b | 10.9 ± 1.2 b | 75.5 ± 12.8 b | 0.452 ± 0.025 a | 0.117 ± 0.006 a | 0.781 ± 0.060 ab |
| Bamboo | 38.3 ± 1.7 b | 10.2 ± 0.8 b | 54.6 ± 3.7 b | 0.480 ± 0.010 a | 0.127 ± 0.005 a | 0.681 ± 0.016 b |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.007 |
The different letters indicate significant differences per soil variable between the vegetation types according to Tukey’s HSD comparisons at p = 0.05, and the bottom row represents the p-value of the one-way ANOVA results.