Literature DB >> 12730042

Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a 73-year-old Scots pine forest.

Chun-Wang Xiao1, J Curiel Yuste, I A Janssens, P Roskams, L Nachtergale, A Carrara, B Y Sanchez, R Ceulemans.   

Abstract

We estimated above- and belowground biomass and net primary production (NPP) of a 73-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest stand in the Belgian Campine region. Total biomass for the stand was 176 Mg ha(-1), of which 74.4% was found in stems. The root system contained 12.6% of total biomass, most of it in coarse roots (> 5 mm). Fine roots (< 5 mm) comprised only about 1.7% of total biomass, and more than 50% of fine root biomass was retrieved in the litter layer and the upper 15 cm of the mineral soil. The ratio of belowground biomass to aboveground biomass was 0.14, which is lower than that of other Scots pine forests and other coniferous forests. Between 1995 and 2001, mean annual NPP was 11.2 Mg ha(-1) year(-1), of which 68.7% was allocated to aboveground compartments. Stems, needles and cones made relatively high contributions to total NPP compared with branches. However, branch NPP was possibly underestimated because litterfall of big branches was neglected. The proportion of total NPP in belowground components was 31.3%. Coarse root NPP (2% of total) was low compared with its biomass. Fine root NPP was 3.3 Mg ha(-1) year(-1), representing about 29.5% of total NPP; however, the estimate of fine root NPP is much more uncertain than NPP of aboveground compartments. The ratio NPP/GPP (gross primary production) was 0.32, which was low compared with other coniferous forests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12730042     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/23.8.505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  9 in total

1.  Tree height and age-related decline in growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).

Authors:  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Dirk Vanderklein; Maurizio Mencuccini
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Forest above-ground volume assessments with terrestrial laser scanning: a ground-truth validation experiment in temperate, managed forests.

Authors:  Miro Demol; Kim Calders; Hans Verbeeck; Bert Gielen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.040

3.  Invasion of moso bamboo into a Japanese cedar plantation affects the chemical composition and humification of soil organic matter.

Authors:  Hsueh-Ching Wang; Guanglong Tian; Chih-Yu Chiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Tree Age Effects on Fine Root Biomass and Morphology over Chronosequences of Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur and Alnus glutinosa Stands.

Authors:  Andrzej M Jagodzinski; Jędrzej Ziółkowski; Aleksandra Warnkowska; Hubert Prais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Allometric biomass equations for 12 tree species in coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests, Northeastern China.

Authors:  Huaijiang He; Chunyu Zhang; Xiuhai Zhao; Folega Fousseni; Jinsong Wang; Haijun Dai; Song Yang; Qiang Zuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of soil C:N:P stoichiometry on biomass allocation in the alpine and arid steppe systems.

Authors:  Xiaodan Wang; Xingxing Ma; Yan Yan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Viewing forests from below: fine root mass declines relative to leaf area in aging lodgepole pine stands.

Authors:  A S Schoonmaker; V J Lieffers; S M Landhäusser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Linking stem growth respiration to the seasonal course of stem growth and GPP of Scots pine.

Authors:  Tommy Chan; Frank Berninger; Pasi Kolari; Eero Nikinmaa; Teemu Hölttä
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Spatial variations and controls of carbon use efficiency in China's terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Guirui Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.