Literature DB >> 27558697

Host range expansion is density dependent.

Bastien Castagneyrol1, Hervé Jactel2, Eckehard G Brockerhoff3, Nicolas Perrette4, Maximilien Larter2, Sylvain Delzon2, Dominique Piou5.   

Abstract

The realized host range of herbivores is expected to increase with herbivore population density. Theory also predicts that trait similarity and phylogenetic relatedness between native and exotic plants is expected to increase the susceptibility of introduced plants to feeding by native herbivores. Whether the ability of native herbivores to extend their host range to introduced species is density dependent is still unknown. We addressed this question by monitoring pine processionary moth (PPM, Thaumetopoea pityocampa) attacks during nine consecutive years on 41 pine species (8 native and 33 introduced) planted in an arboretum. The survey encompassed latent and outbreak periods. A total of 28 pine species were attacked by PPM. There was no difference in the probability of attack between native and introduced pine species. Host range increased and was more phylogenetically clustered during outbreak than latent periods. When population density increased, PPM expanded its diet breadth by attacking introduced pine species that were closely related to native hosts. This study demonstrates the density dependence of host range expansion in a common pine herbivore. Importantly, it supports the idea that the degree of phylogenetic proximity between host species can be a better predictor of attacks than the introduction status, which may help to predict the outcomes of new plant-herbivore interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arboretum; Density dependence; Exotic species; Forestry; Host range; Pine processionary moth

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27558697     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3711-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  26 in total

1.  Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants.

Authors:  Naomi Cappuccino; David Carpenter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Priyanga Amarasekare; Márcio S Araújo; Reinhard Bürger; Jonathan M Levine; Mark Novak; Volker H W Rudolf; Sebastian J Schreiber; Mark C Urban; David A Vasseur
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities.

Authors:  Ingrid M Parker; Megan Saunders; Megan Bontrager; Andrew P Weitz; Rebecca Hendricks; Roger Magarey; Karl Suiter; Gregory S Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Plant defense syndromes.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Mark Fishbein
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Evolution of specialization: a phylogenetic study of host range in the red milkweed beetle (Tetraopes tetraophthalmus).

Authors:  Sergio Rasmann; Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks.

Authors:  Ian S Pearse; Andrew L Hipp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ecological costs on local adaptation of an insect herbivore imposed by host plants and enemies.

Authors:  Daniel Zovi; Michael Stastny; Andrea Battisti; Stig Larsson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  GenBank.

Authors:  Dennis A Benson; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; David J Lipman; James Ostell; Eric W Sayers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches.

Authors:  Stephen A Smith; Jeremy M Beaulieu; Michael J Donoghue
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.