| Literature DB >> 27558424 |
Liling Liu1, Xianying Zeng1, Pucheng Chen1, Guohua Deng1, Yanbing Li1, Jianzhong Shi1, Chunyang Gu1, Huihui Kong1, Yasuo Suzuki2, Yongping Jiang1, Guobin Tian1, Hualan Chen3.
Abstract
The H5N1 avian influenza viruses emerged in Southeast Asia in the late 20th century and have evolved into multiple phylogenetic clades based on their hemagglutinin (HA)-encoding genes. The clade 7.2 viruses were first detected in chickens in northern China in 2006, and vaccines specifically targeted to the clade were developed and have been used in poultry in China since 2006. During routine surveillance and disease diagnosis, we isolated seven H5 viruses between 2011 and 2014 that bear the clade 7.2 HA genes. Here, we performed extensive studies to understand how the clade 7.2 H5 viruses have evolved in chickens in China. Full genome sequence analysis revealed that the seven viruses formed two subtypes (four H5N1 viruses and three H5N2 viruses) and four genotypes by deriving genes from other influenza viruses. All of the viruses had antigenically drifted from the clade 7.2 viruses that were isolated in 2006. Pathogenicity studies of four viruses, one from each genotype, revealed that all of the viruses are highly pathogenic in chickens, but none of them could replicate in ducks. The four viruses exclusively bound to avian-type receptors and replicated only in the turbinates and/or lungs of mice; none of them were lethal to mice at a dosage of 106 50% egg infective doses (EID50). Our study indicates that although the clade 7.2 viruses have not been eradicated from poultry through vaccination, they have not become more dangerous to other animals (e.g., ducks and mice) and humans. IMPORTANCE: Animal influenza viruses can acquire the ability to infect and kill humans. The H5N1 viruses have been a concern in recent decades because of their clear pandemic potential. We sorted H5N1 influenza viruses into different phylogenetic clades based on their HA genes. The clade 7.2 viruses were detected in chickens in several provinces of northern China in 2006. Vaccines for these viruses were subsequently developed and have been used ever since to control infection of poultry. Here, we analyzed the genetic and biologic properties of seven clade 7.2 viruses that were isolated from chickens between 2011 and 2014. We found that after nearly 9 years of circulation in chickens, the clade 7.2 viruses still exclusively bind to avian-type receptors and are of low pathogenicity to mice, suggesting that these H5 viruses pose a low risk to human public health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27558424 PMCID: PMC5068530 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00855-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Virol ISSN: 0022-538X Impact factor: 5.103
FIG 1Phylogenetic analyses of the clade 7.2 H5 viruses isolated in China between 2011 and 2014. The phylogenetic trees were generated by using the neighbor-joining method and the MEGA 5.0 software package. The regions of nucleotide sequence used for the phylogenetic analyses were as follows: HA, 29 to 1732; N1NA, 20 to 1420; N2NA, 1 to 1458; PB2, 28 to 2289; and M, 26 to 1007. Viruses obtained in this study are shown in red. AH, Anhui; BJ, Beijing; CK, chicken; DK, duck; EC, eastern China; GCG, great crested grebe; GD, Guangdong; GH, gray heron; GS, Gansu; GX, Guangxi; GZ, Guizhou; HD, Huadong; HeB, Hebei; HeN, Henan; HK, Hong Kong; HLJ, Heilongjiang; HuB, Hubei; HuN, Hunan; JS, Jiangsu; JX, Jiangxi; KM, Kingmen; LN, Liaoning; MD, mallard; ML, magpie robin; NC, Nanchang; NX, Ningxia; QH, Qinghai; QZ, Qianzhou; SC, Sichuan; SD, Shandong; SH, Shanghai; SJ, Sanjiang; ST, Shantou; SX, Shanxi; TH, Tonghai; VN, Vietnam; XJ, Xinjiang; YN, Yunnan; ZJ, Zhejiang.
FIG 2Genotypes of the clade 7.2 H5 avian influenza viruses. The eight bars represent the eight gene segments of influenza virus: from top to bottom, PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, M, and NS.
Cross-reactive HI antibody titers of serum induced by different H5N1 vaccines against recent clade 7.2 viruses
| Virus | Clade | Isolation date of the recent clade 7.2 virus | Antibody titer of antiserum induced by vaccine (HA gene donor virus) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re-5 (DK/AH/1/06) | Re-6 (DK/GD/S1322/10) | Re-4 (CK/SX/2/06) | Re-7 (CK/LN/S4092/11) | |||
| DK/AH/1/06(H5N1) | 2.3.4 | NA | 8 | 64 | 8 | |
| DK/GD/S1322/10(H5N1) | 2.3.2 | NA | 16 | 32 | 4 | |
| CK/SX/2/06(H5N1) | 7.2 | NA | 128 | 8 | 16 | |
| CK/LN/S4092/11(H5N1) | 7.2 | 8 November 2011 | 8 | 16 | 64 | |
| CK/NX/2/12(H5N1) | 7.2 | 18 April 2012 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 512 |
| CK/GS/5/12(H5N1) | 7.2 | 5 June 2012 | 16 | 16 | 64 | 256 |
| CK/GS/6/12(H5N1) | 7.2 | 8 June 2012 | 16 | 16 | 64 | 256 |
| CK/HeB/3/13(H5N2) | 7.2 | 20 December 2013 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 256 |
| CK/SD/S3/14(H5N2) | 7.2 | 17 January 2014 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 256 |
| CK/HLJ/S7/14(H5N2) | 7.2 | 14 August 2014 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 256 |
Antisera were generated by vaccinating SPF chickens with oil-emulsified inactivated vaccines as indicated. Homologous titers are shown in boldface.
NA, not applicable.
FIG 3Key amino acid changes in the HA proteins of the clade 7.2 H5 avian influenza viruses. (A) Alignment of HA1 protein sequences. Antigenic sites A, B, C, D, and E are boxed in red, green, black, yellow, and purple, respectively. The potential glycosylation sites are underlined. (B) HA monomer of CK/SX/2/06 virus. The amino acid substitutions in antigenic sites of other clade 7.2 viruses are shown in red, and the glycosylation site changes are shown in yellow. The corresponding H3 numbering is shown in parentheses.
FIG 4Characterization of the receptor-binding properties of H5 clade 7.2 viruses. The binding of the viruses to biotinylated α-2,3 (blue) and α-2,6 (pink) sialylglycans was tested. A/Sichuan/1/2009(H1N1) and A/duck/Guangxi/35/2001(H5N1) were used as controls. The data are expressed as means and standard deviations (SD) of three repeats.
Replication and virulence of clade 7.2 H5 viruses in chickens, ducks, and mice
| Virus (genotype) | EID50 of the viral stock (log10/ml) | IVPI in chickens | Ducks | Mice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. shedding virus/surviving/total | No. seroconverting/total | Replication | % survival | ||||
| Turbinate | Lung | ||||||
| CK/LN/S4092/11(H5N1) (A) | 8.2 | 2.97 | 0/10/10 | 5/10 | 1/3 (1.5) | 3/3 (2.5) | 100 |
| CK/GS/5/12(H5N1) (B) | 8.5 | 2.91 | 0/10/10 | 0/10 | 3/3 (3.5) | 3/3 (3.7) | 100 |
| CK/HeB/3/13(H5N2) (C) | 8.4 | 2.95 | 0/10/10 | 4/10 | 0/3 | 2/3 (2.0) | 100 |
| CK/HLJ/S7/14(H5N2) (D) | 8.2 | 2.84 | 0/10/10 | 2/10 | 1/3 (0.8) | 1/3 (1.2) | 100 |
No. positive/total (mean titer [log10EID50/ml]).
Protective efficacies of Re-4 and Re-7 vaccines against H5 clade 7.2 viruses in chickens
| Challenge virus | Vaccine | Group | Mean HI antibody titers against vaccine strain/challenge virus (log2) | No. shedding/total (log10 EID50) | No. surviving/total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 p.c. | Day 5 p.c. | |||||||
| Oropharyngeal | Cloacal | Oropharyngeal | Cloacal | |||||
| CK/LN/S4092/11(H5N1) | Re-4 | Vaccinated | 7.4/4.6 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 |
| Re-7 | Vaccinated | 7.7/7.1 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 | |
| None | Control | <2 | 5/5 (3.5 ± 0.6) | 5/5 (2.7 ± 0.3) | 5/5 (3.3 ± 0.8) | 5/5 (3.7 ± 0.4) | 0/5 | |
| CK/GS/5/12(H5N1) | Re-4 | Vaccinated | 7.9/5.1 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 |
| Re-7 | Vaccinated | 7.8/6.2 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 | |
| None | Control | <2 | 5/5 (2.6 ± 0.5) | 5/5 (2.4 ± 0.1) | 4/4 (3.1 ± 0.6) | 3/4 (3.2 ± 0.4) | 0/5 | |
| CK/HeB/3/13(H5N2) | Re-4 | Vaccinated | 7.7/2.9 | 2/10 (2.9 ± 0.5) | 2/10 (2.1 ± 0.5) | 8/10 (2.3 ± 0.4) | 5/10 (2.1 ± 0.7) | 5/10 |
| Re-7 | Vaccinated | 8.1/7.2 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 | 10/10 | |
| None | Control | <2 | 5/5 (2.7 ± 0.7) | 2/5 (2.6 ± 0.1) | 4/5 (2.4 ± 0.3) | 2/5 (2.5) | 0/5 | |
HI antibody titers were measured by using the vaccine antigen with antisera collected 3 weeks after vaccination.
Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected on days 3 and 5 after viral challenge and titrated in SPF eggs. The titers shown are the means ± standard deviations (SD) calculated for virus-shedding chickens.