Seema Vyas1,2, Lori Heise3. 1. Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania. seema.vyas@lshtm.ac.uk. 2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. seema.vyas@lshtm.ac.uk. 3. Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore how area-level socioeconomic status and gender-related norms influence partner violence against women in Tanzania. METHODS: We analysed data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and used multilevel logistic regression to estimate individual and community-level effects on women's risk of current partner violence. RESULTS: Prevalence of current partner violence was 36.1 %; however, variation in prevalence exists across communities. Twenty-nine percent of the variation in the logodds of partner violence is due to community-level influences. When adjusting for individual-level characteristics, this variation falls to 10 % and falls further to 8 % when adjusting for additional community-level factors. Higher levels of women's acceptance towards wife beating, male unemployment, and years of schooling among men were associated with higher risk of partner violence; however, higher levels of women in paid work were associated with lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: Area-level poverty and inequitable gender norms were associated with higher risk of partner violence. Empowerment strategies along with addressing social attitudes are likely to achieve reductions in rates of partner violence against women in Tanzania and in other similar low-income country settings.
OBJECTIVES: To explore how area-level socioeconomic status and gender-related norms influence partner violence against women in Tanzania. METHODS: We analysed data from the 2010 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and used multilevel logistic regression to estimate individual and community-level effects on women's risk of current partner violence. RESULTS: Prevalence of current partner violence was 36.1 %; however, variation in prevalence exists across communities. Twenty-nine percent of the variation in the logodds of partner violence is due to community-level influences. When adjusting for individual-level characteristics, this variation falls to 10 % and falls further to 8 % when adjusting for additional community-level factors. Higher levels of women's acceptance towards wife beating, male unemployment, and years of schooling among men were associated with higher risk of partner violence; however, higher levels of women in paid work were associated with lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: Area-level poverty and inequitable gender norms were associated with higher risk of partner violence. Empowerment strategies along with addressing social attitudes are likely to achieve reductions in rates of partner violence against women in Tanzania and in other similar low-income country settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gender norms; Multilevel model; Partner violence against women; Poverty; Tanzania
Authors: Bosiljka Djikanovic; Željka Stamenkovic; Vesna Bjegovic Mikanovic; Dejana Vukovic; Vladimir S Gordeev; Natasa Maksimovic Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Jhumka Gupta; Tiara C Willie; Courtney Harris; Paola Abril Campos; Kathryn L Falb; Claudia Garcia Moreno; Claudia Diaz Olavarrieta; Cassandra A Okechukwu Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.710