Literature DB >> 27557504

A novel inflammation-based prognostic score for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the c-reactive protein/prognostic nutritional index ratio.

Sheng Chen1, Xun Yang1, Ji-Feng Feng1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a critical role in cancer prognosis. In the current study, we proposed a novel inflammation-based prognostic score, named c-reactive protein/prognostic nutritional index ratio (CRP/PNI ratio), for predicting the prognosis for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value was 0.10 for CRP/PNI ratio according to the ROC curve. Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS compared to CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 (44.5% vs. 15.7%, P<0.001). On multivariate analyses, we revealed that CRP/PNI ratio was a significant predictive factor of CSS (P=0.009). A nomogram could be more accuracy for CSS. The Harrell's c-index for CSS prediction was 0.688.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 308 patients with resectable ESCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal cuf-off value for CRP/PNI ratio was calculated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyse the cancer-specific survival (CSS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were evaluated for CSS. A nomogram was also established to predict the prognosis for CSS.
CONCLUSION: The CRP/PNI ratio is a novel and useful prognostic score for CSS in patients with resectable ESCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  c-reactive protein (CRP); cancer-specific survival (CSS); esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); prognostic nutritional index (PNI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27557504      PMCID: PMC5308715          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers, leading to over 406,800 deaths worldwide and more than 200,000 deaths in China every year [1, 2]. There are two major histological types of EC: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) [3]. The predominant pathological type in China is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), which covers more than 90% of all cases [3, 4]. Radical esophagectomy remains the treatment of choice, however, the prognosis is still poor. Therefore, it is important to detect simple and effective biomarkers regarding prognosis for patients with ESCC. It has increasingly been recognized that inflammation plays a critical role in cancer [5, 6]. Cancer-related inflammation can influence tumor cell migration, invasion and metastasis [6]. Therefore, several inflammation-based hematological biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have been analysed in various cancers [7-11]. However, few studies regarding these inflammation-based biomarkers in patients with EC are available, and the prognostic values of these biomarkers remain uncertain [12-15]. As mentioned above, previous reports have indicated that both CRP and PNI are related to cancer prognosis. However, to our knowledge, no study so far has assessed the clinical significance of the CRP/PNI ratio in other cancers as well as EC. In the current study, therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of CRP/PNI ratio for patients with resectable ESCC. In addition, we attempt to establish a predictive nomogram to predict the survival prediction in patients with ESCC.

RESULTS

Among the 308 patients, 40 (13.0%) were women and 268 (87.0%) were men. The mean CRP and PNI were 9.4 ± 13.5 mg/l and 48.0 ± 6.0, respectively. In addition, a significant negative correlation between CRP and PNI was found (r=−0.279, P<0.001; Figure 1).
Figure 1

Pearson correlation

A significant negative correlation between CRP and PNI (r=−0.279, P<0.001).

Pearson correlation

A significant negative correlation between CRP and PNI (r=−0.279, P<0.001). A ROC curve for CSS prediction was plotted to verify the optimal cuf-off value for CRP/PNI ratio, which was 0.10 (Figure 2). It demonstrated that CRP/PNI ratio predicts cancer prognosis with a sensitivity of 60.9% and a specificity of 74.2%. Then, patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 and patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10. There were 155 (50.3%) patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 and 153 (49.7%) patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10. The relationships between the CRP/PNI ratio and clinical characteristics were shown in Table 1. Our study revealed that CRP/PNI ratio was associated with tumor length (P <0.001), TNM stage (P = 0.012), GPS (P <0.001), CRP (P <0.001), PNI (P <0.001), NLR (P <0.001) and PLR (P <0.001).
Figure 2

ROC curve for CSS prediction

A ROC curve for CSS prediction was plotted to verify the optimal cuf-off value for CRP/PNI ratio, which was 0.10. It demonstrated that CRP/PNI ratio predicts cancer prognosis with a sensitivity of 60.9% and a specificity of 74.2%.

Table 1

The relationship between CRP/PNI ratio and clinical characteristics

Cases (n)CRP/PNIP-valueCRP/PNIP-value
(mean ± SD)≤ 0.10 (n)> 0.10 (n)
Age (years)0.3990.806
 ≤ 601750.22 ± 0.378788
 > 601330.19 ± 0.256865
Gender0.1250.768
 Female400.14 ± 0.152119
 Male2680.22 ± 0.34134134
Tumor length (cm)0.005<0.001
 ≤ 3.0820.12 ± 0.285521
 > 3.02260.24 ± 0.33100126
Tumor location0.348
 Upper170.28 ± 0.57Reference710
 Middle1440.22 ± 0.320.5506876
 Lower1470.19 ± 0.290.2758067
Vessel invasion0.7090.057
 Negative2580.21 ± 0.33136122
 Positive500.23 ± 0.281931
Differentiation0.266
 Well440.21 ± 0.39Reference2519
 Moderate2040.20 ± 0.290.75710599
 Poor600.25 ± 0.390.6022535
TNM stage0.012
 I730.11 ± 0.11Reference4726
 II1040.20 ± 0.320.0055252
 III1310.28 ± 0.39<0.0015675
GPS<0.001
 01790.07 ± 0.07Reference13445
 1910.32 ± 0.36<0.0011873
 2380.52 ± 0.59<0.001335
CRP (mg/l)<0.001<0.001
 ≤ 10.02050.07 ± 0.0515352
 > 10.01030.49 ± 0.432101
PNI<0.001<0.001
 ≤ 451060.33 ± 0.433868
 > 452020.15 ± 0.2311785
NLR<0.001<0.001
 ≤ 3.502030.15 ± 0.2112083
 > 3.501050.33 ± 0.453570
PLR<0.001<0.001
 ≤ 1501730.14 ± 0.1910370
 > 1501350.30 ± 0.425283

ROC curve for CSS prediction

A ROC curve for CSS prediction was plotted to verify the optimal cuf-off value for CRP/PNI ratio, which was 0.10. It demonstrated that CRP/PNI ratio predicts cancer prognosis with a sensitivity of 60.9% and a specificity of 74.2%. Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤ 0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS than patients with CRP/PNI ratio > 0.10 (44.5% vs. 15.7%, P <0.001) (Figure 3A). The 5-year CSS for patients with GPS0, 1 and 2 were 38.5%, 20.9% and 13.2%, respectively (P <0.001; Figure 3B). In addition, our study revealed that patients with elevated CRP (13.6% vs. 38.5%; P <0.001; Figure 3C) or decreased PNI (21.7% vs. 34.7%; P <0.001; Figure 3D) were also significantly associated with decreased 5-year CSS, respectively. In subgroup analyses, we demonstrated that CRP/PNI ratio was also significantly correlated with CSS based on TNM stage, which was superior to CRP or PNI (Figure 4).
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier CSS curves stratified by CRP/PNI ratio A., GPS B., CRP C. and PNI D

Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS than patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 (44.5% vs. 15.7%, P <0.001). The 5-year CSS for patients with GPS0, 1 and 2 were 38.5%, 20.9% and 13.2%, respectively (P <0.001). Patients with elevated CRP (13.6% vs. 38.5%; P <0.001) or decreased PNI (21.7% vs. 34.7%; P <0.001) were also significantly associated with decreased 5-year CSS, respectively.

Figure 4

Kaplan-Meier CSS curves stratified by TNM stage

CRP/PNI ratio A-C. was significantly correlated with CSS based on TNM stage, which was superior to CRP D-F. or PNI G-I. Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS than patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 in TNM I (55.3% vs. 23.1%, P =0.027; A), TNM II (46.2% vs. 21.2%, P =0.003; B) and TNM III (33.9% vs. 9.3%, P <0.001; C). CRP was not significantly correlated with CSS in TNM I (48.3% vs. 23.1%, P =0.058; D), but significantly correlated with CSS in TNM II (40.0% vs. 20.6%, P =0.018; E) and TNM III (29.3% vs. 7.1%, P <0.001; F). PNI were not significantly correlated with CSS in TNM I (42.4% vs. 50.0%, P =0.686; G), TNM II (37.0% vs. 25.8%, P =0.087; H) or TNM III (25.7% vs. 13.1%, P =0.076; I).

Kaplan-Meier CSS curves stratified by CRP/PNI ratio A., GPS B., CRP C. and PNI D

Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS than patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 (44.5% vs. 15.7%, P <0.001). The 5-year CSS for patients with GPS0, 1 and 2 were 38.5%, 20.9% and 13.2%, respectively (P <0.001). Patients with elevated CRP (13.6% vs. 38.5%; P <0.001) or decreased PNI (21.7% vs. 34.7%; P <0.001) were also significantly associated with decreased 5-year CSS, respectively.

Kaplan-Meier CSS curves stratified by TNM stage

CRP/PNI ratio A-C. was significantly correlated with CSS based on TNM stage, which was superior to CRP D-F. or PNI G-I. Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS than patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 in TNM I (55.3% vs. 23.1%, P =0.027; A), TNM II (46.2% vs. 21.2%, P =0.003; B) and TNM III (33.9% vs. 9.3%, P <0.001; C). CRP was not significantly correlated with CSS in TNM I (48.3% vs. 23.1%, P =0.058; D), but significantly correlated with CSS in TNM II (40.0% vs. 20.6%, P =0.018; E) and TNM III (29.3% vs. 7.1%, P <0.001; F). PNI were not significantly correlated with CSS in TNM I (42.4% vs. 50.0%, P =0.686; G), TNM II (37.0% vs. 25.8%, P =0.087; H) or TNM III (25.7% vs. 13.1%, P =0.076; I). In univariate analyses, tumor length (P =0.029), vessel invasion (P =0.011), TNM stage (P < 0.001), CRP/PNI ratio (P <0.001), GPS (P <0.001), CRP (P <0.001), PNI (P =0.002), NLR (P <0.001) and PLR (P <0.001) were significant predictors of CSS (Table 2). In multivariate analyses, we demonstrated that CRP/PNI ratio was an independent prognostic factor in patients with resectable ESCC. Patients with CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.652 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.131-2.414, P =0.009] for CSS. In addition, PLR was also a significant independent predictor of CSS (P =0.007). However, the results of our study showed that CRP/PNI ratio was superior to CRP (HR = 1.237, P = 0.355) or PNI (HR = 1.055, P = 0.761) as a predictive factor in patients with ESCC.
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses for patients with ESCC

CSSP-valueUnivariateP-valueMultivariateP-value
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Age (years)0.6910.6940.700
 ≤ 6030.3ReferenceReference
 > 6030.11.056 (0.806-1.383)1.056 (0.799-1.396)
Gender0.4730.4770.887
 Female35.0ReferenceReference
 Male29.51.160 (0.770-1.748)0.970 (0.632-1.486)
Tumor length (cm)0.0270.0290.263
 ≤ 3.036.6ReferenceReference
 > 3.027.91.416 (1.036-1.936)0.814 (0.567-1.168)
Tumor location0.6440.6520.863
 Upper41.2ReferenceReference
 Middle29.21.355 (0.708-2.595)0.3591.202 (0.616-2.344)0.590
 Lower29.91.341 (0.701-2.568)0.3761.193 (0.610-2.335)0.606
Vessel invasion0.0100.0110.485
 Negative32.6ReferenceReference
 Positive18.01.556 (1.106-2.188)1.140 (0.790-1.645)
Differentiation0.1200.1280.080
 Well40.9ReferenceReference
 Moderate28.91.290 (0.849-1.958)0.2331.271 (0.815-1.981)0.290
 Poor26.71.637 (1.008-2.660)0.0461.741 (1.041-2.913)0.035
TNM stage<0.001<0.0010.001
 I43.8ReferenceReference
 II33.71.518 (1.031-2.235)0.0341.522 (1.006-2.303)0.047
 III19.82.346 (1.632-3.372)<0.0012.465 (1.542-3.940)<0.001
Adjuvant therapy0.4720.4770.110
 No30.2ReferenceReference
 Yes30.11.112 (0.831-1.487)0.758 (0.539-1.065)
CRP/PNI ratio<0.001<0.0010.009
 ≤ 0.1044.5ReferenceReference
 > 0.1015.72.293 (1.742-3.018)1.652 (1.131-2.414)
GPS<0.001<0.0010.531
 038.5ReferenceReference
 120.91.910 (1.417-2.574)<0.0011.258 (0.839-1.887)0.266
 213.22.599 (1.755-3.849)<0.0011.182 (0.644-2.171)0.589
CRP (mg/l)<0.001<0.0010.355
 ≤ 1038.5ReferenceReference
 > 1013.62.333 (1.773-3.071)1.237 (0.788-1.942)
PNI0.0010.0020.761
 > 4534.7ReferenceReference
 ≤ 4521.71.562 (1.186-2.057)1.055 (0.747-1.490)
NLR<0.001<0.0010.949
 ≤ 3.5036.5ReferenceReference
 > 3.5018.11.740 (1.323-2.289)0.989 (0.713-1.373)
PLR<0.001<0.0010.007
 ≤ 15038.2ReferenceReference
 > 15020.01.793 (1.371-2.346)1.505 (1.119-2.025)
The areas under the curve (AUC) was 0.671 (95% CI: 0.606-0.736, P <0.001) for CRP/PNI ratio, 0.632 (95% CI: 0.567-0.696, P <0.001) for CRP, 0.622 (95% CI: 0.556-0.687, P = 0.001) for GPS and 0.569 (95% CI: 0.501-0.638, P =0.053) for PNI. The discrimination ability of the CRP/PNI ratio was higher than other inflammation-based biomarkers, indicating that the CRP/PNI ratio was superior to the GPS, CRP or PNI (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Comparison of the AUC for ROC curves

The AUC of the CRP/PNI ratio was higher than other inflammation-based biomarkers, indicating that the CRP/PNI ratio was superior to the GPS, CRP or PNI for prognosis.

Comparison of the AUC for ROC curves

The AUC of the CRP/PNI ratio was higher than other inflammation-based biomarkers, indicating that the CRP/PNI ratio was superior to the GPS, CRP or PNI for prognosis. To predict the risk for patients with ESCC, a novel nomogram model was established by prognostic factors (TNM stage, PLR and CRP/PNI ratio) combined with age and sex (Figure 6). It can predict the probability of death for patients with ESCC. The Harrell's c-index for CSS prediction was 0.688.
Figure 6

Nomogram model for death risk prediction

The nomogram is used by totalling the points identified at the top of the scale for each independent factor. The Harrell's c-index for CSS prediction was 0.688.

Nomogram model for death risk prediction

The nomogram is used by totalling the points identified at the top of the scale for each independent factor. The Harrell's c-index for CSS prediction was 0.688.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, a novel inflammation-based prognostic score (CRP/PNI ratio) was conducted based on CRP and PNI and was shown to be an independent predictor for patients with resectable ESCC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to determine the prognostic value of CRP/PNI ratio in predicting prognosis for patients with resectable ESCC. There is strong linkage between inflammation and cancer. CRP was initially identified as a substance reacting with pneumococcal C-polysaccharide, which appeared in inflammation [16]. Previous published studies have shown that serum CRP is a predictor of survival in several cancers, including EC [7, 8, 12, 13]. A meta-analysis conducted by Huang et al. [17] revealed high levels of CRP were significantly associated with poor survival in patients with EC. In our study, patients with CRP ≤10.0 mg/l had a significantly better 5-year CSS than patients with CRP >10.0 mg/l (38.5% vs. 13.6%, P<0.001). However, CRP was not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analyses (P=0.355). The PNI is calculated based on the serum albumin and lymphocyte count. It was originally proposed to assess the perioperative nutritional conditions for patients with gastrointestinal tumors [10]. Recently, the PNI has been shown to be a prognostic marker for various malignancies [10, 11]. However, few studies regarding PNI in patients with EC are available, and the clinical significance and prognostic value of this marker remain uncertain. Nozoe et al. [15] showed that PNI is associated with tumor progression and survival in patients with EC. However, Sun et al. [18] showed that PNI does not correlate with prognosis in patients with ESCC. In the current study, however, PNI was not an independent prognostic factor (P=0.761). As we know, both CRP and PNI are influenced by various non-cancer-related conditions, and the ratio of CRP and PNI could therefore minimise the potential basis. The prognostic value of the CRP/PNI ratio for ESCC patients would be more reliable than the effect of either CRP or PNI. In the current study, therefore, we firstly investigated the prognostic significance of CRP/PNI in assessing the outcomes in ESCC patients. Patients with CRP/PNI ratio ≤0.10 had a significantly better 5-year CSS compared to CRP/PNI ratio >0.10 (44.5% vs. 15.7%, P<0.001). On multivariate analyses, we demonstrated that CRP/PNI ratio was a significant predictive factor of CSS (P=0.009). Neither in other cancer nor in ESCC had the significance of CRP/PNI been investigated before. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the CRP/PNI ratio has been found to be a predictor of CSS in patients with ESCC. In the current study, we used the GPS, a well-known inflammatory parameter, in the Cox regression model, while multivariate analyses showed that the CRP/PNI ratio (P=0.009), but not GPS (P=0.531), was an independent prognostic factor. From this point of view, the CRP/PNI ratio may have additional prognostic value over the GPS with regard to predicting CSS in ESCC patients. In ROC analyses, our findings revealed that the AUC was higher in CRP/PNI ratio (0.671), than GPS (0.622), CRP (0.632) or PNI (0.569), indicated that the CRP/PNI ratio was superior to other inflammation-based prognostic scores in terms of its prognostic ability in patients with ESCC. It is well know that nomogram could establish a simple graphic representation of a statistical predictive model [19]. Moreover, several reports revealed that nomogram has been shown to be more accurate than the conventional methods for cancer prognosis [20, 21]. In the current study, therefore, we attempt to establish a predictive nomogram to predict the probability that the death risk for ESCC patients based on TNM stage, CRP/PNI ratio combined with age and sex. The nomogram performed well in predicting CSS by c-index (0.688). The potential limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. Firstly, our study was a retrospective analyses with a short duration of the mean follow-up. Secondly, we excluded patients who had received neoadjuvant treatment, which may have influenced the result. Thirdly, the difference was large between sex ratio in the current study and esophageal cancer epidemiological data, which may have influenced the result. Finally, we initially used a nomogram to predict prognostic value of CRP/PNI ratio in patients with ESCC, however, it should be better to use external study cohort to validate the nomogram. Therefore, larger prospective studies will need to be performed to confirm these preliminary results. In summary, there was a significant association between the CRP/PNI ratio and clinical characteristics. Based on the results of the current study, we beleve that CRP/PNI ratio is a novel and useful predictive factor for CSS in patients with resectable ESCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2008, a retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with histopathologically confirmed ESCC with no distant metastasis (TNM stage I–III). All patients underwent curative esophagectomy and standard lymphadenectomy. The standard surgical approach consisted of the Ivor Lewis procedure and the McKeown procedure. In our institute, the majority of patients underwent two-field lymphadenectomy. Three-field lymphadenectomy was used only if the cervical lymph nodes were thought to be abnormal upon preoperative evaluation. Patients who had received preoperative therapy were excluded. At last, 308 patients were enrolled in our study. In the current study, a cancer-specific survival (CSS) analysis was ascertained. The last follow-up was 30 June 2013. This study was approved by the Ethical Committees of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China). Patients were staged according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging [22]. Routine laboratory results were extracted in a retrospective medical records. The GPS was calculated as follows [9, 14]: patients with elevated CRP (>10 mg/l) and hypoalbuminemia (<35 g/l) were assigned to a score of 2. Patients with one or no abnormal value were assigned to a score of 1 or 0, respectively. The PNI was calculated using following the formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3) [10, 11, 15]. The cut-off value for CRP and PNI were 10 mg/l and 45 according to the previous studies [7, 8, 10–13].

Statistical analysis

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CSS prediction was plotted to verify the optimal cuf-off value for CRP/PNI ratio. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyse CSS. The CSS was defined as the time from the cancer diagnosis until occurrence of cancer-related death or the end of follow up. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to analyse the prognostic factors. The areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared using the method reported by DeLong et al. [23]. A nomogram model was established and the predictive accuracy was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (c-index) [19]. All of the tests were two-sided, and P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R 3.2.3 software (Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria).
  23 in total

1.  Correlation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Nozoe; Y Kimura; M Ishida; H Saeki; D Korenaga; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Comparison of the prognostic values of various nutritional parameters in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from Southern China.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Fei Zhang; Cui Chen; Xin An; Yu-Hong Li; Feng-Hua Wang; Zhi-Hua Zhu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Are nomograms better than currently available stage groupings for bladder cancer?

Authors:  Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan; Joseph E M Crozier; Khalid Canna; Wilson J Angerson; Colin S McArdle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The impact of preoperative serum C-reactive protein on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Koji Hashimoto; Yasuharu Ikeda; Daisuke Korenaga; Kazuo Tanoue; Motoharu Hamatake; Katsumi Kawasaki; Terutoshi Yamaoka; Yasue Iwatani; Kohei Akazawa; Kenji Takenaka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is a predictor of perioperative and long-term outcome in patients with only surgically treated esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Julian Loos; Josephine Dedow; Michael Tachezy; Guentac Uzunoglu; Asad Kutup; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Valerie W Rusch; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Kanda; T Fujii; Y Kodera; S Nagai; S Takeda; A Nakao
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Association of C-reactive protein levels and long-term survival after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Urs Zingg; Jens Forberger; Branimir Rajcic; Christopher Langton; Glyn G Jamieson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Prognostic role of serum C-reactive protein in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Ji-Feng Feng; Jin-Shi Liu; Qi-Xun Chen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  11 in total

1.  C-reactive protein to prealbumin ratio: a useful inflammatory and nutritional index for predicting prognosis after curative resection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Suguru Maruyama; Akihiko Okamura; Yasukazu Kanie; Kei Sakamoto; Daisuke Fujiwara; Jun Kanamori; Yu Imamura; Koshi Kumagai; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Perioperative Predictive Markers for Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yoshinori Fujiwara; Masaharu Higashida; Hisako Kubota; Yuko Okamoto; Shumei Mineta; Shunji Endo; Tomio Ueno
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Prognostic and clinicopathologic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Yue Sun; Ping Peng; Sixian Zhu; Wei Sun; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Prediction models for patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H G van den Boorn; E G Engelhardt; J van Kleef; M A G Sprangers; M G H van Oijen; A Abu-Hanna; A H Zwinderman; V M H Coupé; H W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of survival in resectable gastric cancer patients with normal preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Noriyuki Hirahara; Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yusuke Fujii; Shunsuke Kaji; Tetsu Yamamoto; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Takahito Taniura; Yasunari Kawabata
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  C-reactive Protein Overexpression in the Background Liver of Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is a Prognostic Biomarker.

Authors:  Jin Ho Shin; Eunsil Yu; Eun Na Kim; Chong Jai Kim
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-27

7.  The role of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yibo Xue; Xiang Zhou; Lei Xue; Ruhua Zhou; Jinhua Luo
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  The prognostic value of pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Xin Wang; Yutian Lai; Kun Zhou; Yuxin Tang; Guowei Che
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio in Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Luan; Hsin-Yi Yang; Yao-Te Tsai; Meng-Chiao Hsieh; Hsin-Hsu Chou; Kuo-Su Chen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-26

10.  Prognostic Significance of C-reactive Protein-to-prealbumin Ratio in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Hiroshi Miyata; Keijiro Sugimura; Masaaki Motoori; Kei Asukai; Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Hirofumi Akita; Junichi Nishimura; Hiroshi Wada; Hidenori Takahashi; Masayoshi Yasui; Takeshi Omori; Masayuki Ohue; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masahiko Yano
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 1.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.