| Literature DB >> 27556492 |
Yuwei Zhang1, Yulan Liu2, Yin Liu3, Yanjie Zhang4, Zhiguang Su5.
Abstract
Retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA) plays a key role in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism and insulin expression that are implicated in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the effects of genetic variants in the RORA gene on the susceptibility to T2DM remain unknown. Nine tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were screened by using the SNaPshot method in 427 patients with T2DM and 408 normal controls. Association between genotypes and haplotypes derived from these SNPs with T2DM was analyzed using different genetic models. Allele and genotype frequencies at rs10851685 were significantly different between T2DM patients and control subjects (allele: p = 0.009, Odds ratios (OR) = 1.36 [95% Confidence intervals (CI) = 1.08-1.72]; genotype: p = 0.029). The minor allele T, at rs10851685, was potentially associated with an increased risk of T2DM in the dominant model, displaying OR of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.04-1.82, p = 0.025) in subjects with genotypes TA+TT vs. AA. In haplotype analysis, we observed that haplotypes GGTGTAACT, GGTGTAACC, and GATATAACT were significantly associated with increased risk of T2DM, while haplotypes GATGAAGTT, AGTGAAGTT, and AATGAAATT were protective against T2DM. These data suggest that the genetic variation in RORA might determine a Chinese Han individual's susceptibility to T2DM.Entities:
Keywords: RORA; association; gene variation; haplotype; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2016 PMID: 27556492 PMCID: PMC4999842 DOI: 10.3390/genes7080054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Characteristics of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and control subjects a.
| Variable | Cases ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 57.37 ± 11.28 | 58.26 ± 10.51 | 0.062 b |
| Sex (Men/Women) | 219/208 | 209/199 | 0.075 b |
| BMI (kg/m2) c | 24.16 ± 2.25 | 23.28 ± 2.13 | 0.086 b |
| SBP (mmHg) c | 140.16 ± 18.21 | 124.41 ± 14.18 | |
| DBP (mmHg) c | 83.47 ± 8.68 | 77.63 ± 9.32 | |
| FPG (mmol/L) c | 9.77 ± 1.15 | 4.86 ± 0.58 | |
| TC (mmol/L) c | 5.11 ± 0.92 | 4.87 ± 0.88 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) c | 1.22 ± 0.33 | 1.38 ± 0.37 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) c | 2.77 ± 0.82 | 2.69 ± 0.91 | 0.073 b |
| TG (mmol/L) c | 1.72 ± 0.53 | 1.21 ± 0.34 |
a Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). b no significant difference (p > 0.05). c BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose. TC: total cholesterol; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; TG: triglyceride. d Statistically significant at p < 0.05 in bold.
Distributions of the retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in T2DM patients and controls.
| SNP | Group | Genotype | HWE a | Allele | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | FDR | Freq. % | FDR | OR [95% CI] c | ||||||
| rs17270188 | AA/AG/GG | A | G | |||||||
| T2DM | 94/195/138 | 0.869 | 0.871 | 0.112 | 44.8 | 55.2 | 0.614 | 0.658 | 0.95 [0.78–1.15] | |
| Control | 93/190/125 | 0.204 | 46.1 | 53.9 | ||||||
| rs1898413 | AA/AG/GG | A | G | |||||||
| T2DM | 14/112/301 | 0.772 | 0.793 | 0.373 | 16.4 | 83.6 | 0.644 | 0.681 | 1.06 [0.82–1.38] | |
| Control | 10/107/291 | 0.965 | 15.6 | 84.4 | ||||||
| rs11638541 | TT/TC/CC | T | C | |||||||
| T2DM | 336/84/7 | 0.809 | 0.822 | 0.512 | 88.5 | 11.5 | 0.541 | 0.592 | 1.10 [0.81–1.50] | |
| Control | 327/76/5 | 0.806 | 89.5 | 10.5 | ||||||
| rs8033552 | AA/AG/GG | A | G | |||||||
| T2DM | 17/117/293 | 0.801 | 0.814 | 0.225 | 17.7 | 82.3 | 0.494 | 0.521 | 1.09 [0.85–1.41] | |
| Control | 14/106/288 | 0.280 | 16.4 | 83.6 | ||||||
| TT/TA/AA | T | A | ||||||||
| T2DM | 26/156/245 | 0.860 | 24.4 | 75.6 | ||||||
| Control | 13/130/265 | 0.540 | 19.1 | 80.9 | ||||||
| rs8041381 | AA/AG/GG | A | G | |||||||
| T2DM | 310/111/6 | 0.847 | 0.864 | 0.262 | 85.6 | 14.4 | 0.745 | 0.776 | 1.05 [0.80–1.38] | |
| Control | 299/105/4 | 0.113 | 86.2 | 13.8 | ||||||
| rs340002 | AA/AG/GG | A | G | |||||||
| T2DM | 51/204/172 | 0.804 | 0.818 | 0.421 | 35.8 | 64.2 | 0.586 | 0.601 | 1.06 [0.871–1.29] | |
| Control | 43/196/169 | 0.210 | 34.6 | 65.4 | ||||||
| rs340023 | CC/CT/TT | C | T | |||||||
| T2DM | 68/189/170 | 0.661 | 0.692 | 0.206 | 38.1 | 61.9 | 0.421 | 0.479 | 1.09 [0.89–1.32] | |
| Control | 56/183/169 | 0.566 | 36.2 | 63.8 | ||||||
| rs28724570 | CC/CT/TT | C | T | |||||||
| T2DM | 107/215/105 | 0.311 | 0.358 | 0.884 | 50.2 | 49.8 | 0.134 | 0.142 | 1.16 [0.96–1.40] | |
| Control | 90/200/118 | 0.762 | 46.6 | 53.4 | ||||||
HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. b FDR q: false discovery rate q value. c OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. p or q value of 0.05 is in bold.
Association between RORA SNPs and the risk of T2DM under different genetic models.
| SNP | Genetic Model a | FDR | OR [95% CI] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs17270181 | Dominant | (AG + AA) vs. GG | 0.183 | 0.231 | 1.32 [0.88–2.01] |
| rs1898413 | Additive | AG vs. GG | 0.918 | 0.921 | 1.01 [0.81–1.26] |
| AA vs. GG | 0.384 | 0.413 | 1.30 [0.72–2.34] | ||
| rs11638541 | Dominant | (AG + GG) vs. AA | 0.222 | 0.298 | 1.15 [0.92–1.44] |
| rs8033552 | Recessive | AA vs. (AG + GG) | 0.178 | 0.202 | 1.34 [0.87–2.05] |
| Dominant | (TA + TT) vs. AA | ||||
| rs8041381 | Dominant | (AG + GG) vs. AA | 0.333 | 0.402 | 0.88 [0.58–1.33] |
| rs340002 | Dominant | (AG + AA) vs. GG | 0.699 | 0.748 | 1.04 [0.86–1.26] |
| rs340023 | Recessive | CC vs. (CT + TT) | 0.195 | 0.243 | 1.21 [0.91–1.62] |
| rs28724570 | Recessive | CC vs. (CT + TT) | 0.057 | 0.103 | 1.79 [0.98–3.23] |
For each SNP, only the best genetic model determined by Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) is provided. The ORs and CIs that are statistically significant are bolded, along with the rs number of the corresponding SNP.
Figure 1Effects of rs10851685 on metabolic parameters analyzed with covariates gender, age, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) status and body mass index (BMI). * Statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Frequencies of pairwise haplotype constructed by SNPs in RORA.
| Haplotype a | Freq. (case) | Freq. | Fisher’s | OR [95% CI] b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (control) | |||||
| GGTGTAGTT | 0.044 | 0.031 | 1.03 | 0.417 | |
| GGTGTAGTT | 0.072 | 0.056 | 2.37 | 0.097 | |
| GGTGTAACT | 0.102 | 0.058 | 8.38 | ||
| GGTGTAACC | 0.093 | 0.024 | 17.21 | ||
| GATATAGCT | 0.061 | 0.06 | 3.01 | 0.086 | |
| GATGAGGTT | 0.038 | 0.029 | 0.08 | 0.862 | |
| GATGAAGTT | 0.179 | 0.234 | 13.46 | ||
| AGTGAAGTT | 0.033 | 0.054 | 5.36 | ||
| GATATAACT | 0.046 | 0 | 19.51 | ||
| AATGAAATT | 0 | 0.034 | 18.79 |
a The order of SNPs from left to right is rs17270188, rs1898413, rs11638541, rs8033552, rs10851685, rs8041381, rs340002, rs340023 and rs28724570. Only haplotypes with a frequency > 3% in at least one group were listed. b Only haplotypes distributed significantly differently (p < 0.05) were calculated. The OR could not be calculated for the haplotypes GATATAACT and AATGAAATT, because of the zero value in the population.