| Literature DB >> 27555449 |
Abstract
This article argues that the statutory time limits upon the storage of gametes have unintended and perhaps even perverse consequences for women freezing their eggs as insurance against age-related fertility decline. They work against good clinical practice and potentially represent an interference with a woman's right to respect for her family life, which is neither necessary nor proportionate. My claim will be that the statutory time limit, and the options for extension, are no longer fit for purpose. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.Entities:
Keywords: Cryobanking of Sperm, Ova or Embryos; In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer; Law; Reproductive Medicine
Year: 2016 PMID: 27555449 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903