| Literature DB >> 27554374 |
Dae-Jin Kwon1, Dong-Hwan Kim2,3, In-Sul Hwang1, Dong-Ern Kim2, Hyung-Joo Kim2, Jang-Seong Kim2, Kichoon Lee4, Gi-Sun Im1, Jeong-Woong Lee5,6, Seongsoo Hwang7.
Abstract
Recent progress in genetic manipulation of pigs designated for xenotransplantation ha6s shown considerable promise on xenograft survival in primates. However, genetic modification of multiple genes in donor pigs by knock-out and knock-in technologies, aiming to enhance immunological tolerance against transplanted organs in the recipients, has not been evaluated for health issues of donor pigs. We produced transgenic Massachusetts General Hospital piglets by knocking-out the α-1,3-galactosyltransferase (GT) gene and by simultaneously knocking-in an expression cassette containing five different human genes including, DAF, CD39, TFPI, C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), and TNFAIP3 (A20) [GT-(DAF/CD39/TFPI/C1-INH/TNFAIP3)/+] that are connected by 2A peptide cleavage sequences to release individual proteins from a single translational product. All five individual protein products were successfully produced as determined by western blotting of umbilical cords from the newborn transgenic pigs. Although gross observation and histological examination revealed no significant pathological abnormality in transgenic piglets, hematological examination found that the transgenic piglets had abnormally low numbers of platelets and WBCs, including neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and lymphocytes. However, transgenic piglets had similar numbers of RBC and values of parameters related to RBC compared to the control littermate piglets. These data suggest that transgenic expression of those human genes in pigs impaired hematopoiesis except for erythropoiesis. In conclusion, our data suggest that transgenic expression of up to five different genes can be efficiently achieved and provide the basis for determining optimal dosages of transgene expression and combinations of the transgenes to warrant production of transgenic donor pigs without health issues.Entities:
Keywords: Immune rejection; Leucopenia; Multi-transgenic pigs; Thrombocytopenia; Xenotransplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27554374 PMCID: PMC5243873 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-016-9979-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transgenic Res ISSN: 0962-8819 Impact factor: 2.788
Fig. 1Construction of multiple gene expression vector and identification of GGTA1 (GT) KO/multiple gene KI cell lines. a Schematic of a ZFN-based KI process. The KI vector pLNDT-2A5-Gal has an expression unit for multiple genes with 5′ and 3′ α-gal homology arms at its both end. In the bottom of this figure, the structure of working pLNDT-2A5Gal vector is shown. Primers used for identification of KI cell clones are shown above and below the constructs. b Confirmation of the multiple genes in porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAECs) by RT-PCR. Established the ICAM2-2A5 vector which is the multiple gene expression vector connected by 2A was transfected into PAECs and verified expression of the multiple genes by 2A system before establishment of cell lines. NC: normal PAECs; 2A5: PAECs transfected ICAM2-2A5 vector. c Genotyping of selected cell lines. Targeting vector was transfected into ear fibroblasts from MGH minipigs (mpEF). Four cell lines were established and confirmed by 3 of specific primer sets: 0.8 kb of TG primer sets; 1 kb of 5′ a-Gal primer sets; 1.1 kb of 3′ a-gal primer stets. Among the four cell lines, only two of them were confirmed as transgenic cell lines. 1 normal pig genomic DNA; #2 and 3 transgenic and Knock-in cells; #4 and 5 transgenic cell lines
Pregnancy and delivery rate by donor cell types
| Types | No. of embryos transferred | No. of surrogates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transferred | Pregnanta | Deliveredb | ||
| Cloning | 122 ± 29 | 15 | 7 | 5 |
| RE-cloning | 123 ± 29 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Cloning: primary TG cell; RE-cloning: TG cells originated from cloning pig
aPregnancy was confirmed by gestation sac formation using ultrasound examination at 28 days after embryo transfer
bNo. of surrogates delivered/No. of surrogates pregnant
Full-term development of multi-transgenic cloned piglets
| Types | No. of surrogates | Delivery statusa | No. of piglets born | Targeting | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Survival | Deadb | ||||
| Cloning | 1 | 117 (C-sec) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 117 (C-sec) | 1 | 1 | – | ||
| 3 | 116 (natural) | 5 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 4 | 117 (C-sec) | 1 | 1 | – | ||
| 5 | 114 (C-sec) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Re-cloning | 6 | 114 (C-sec) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Cloning: primary TG cell; Re-cloning: TG cells originated from cloning pig
All five targeted piglets died about 48 h after birth without specific symptoms
aPregnancy periods after transfer of multi-transgenic cloned embryos
bPiglets that died within 1 day
Fig. 2Development of multiple gene expression pigs with GT knock-out. a The newborn GT−(DAF/CD39/TFPI/C1-INH/TNFAIP3)/+ Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) piglet delivered by Caesarean section. b Genotyping of the piglets by RT-PCR. Three of the multiple transgenic piglets were confirmed genetically with the three primer sets. PC positive control which is genomic DNA from cell line #2; NC negative control which is normal pig genomic DNA; 1, 2 and 3: genomic DNA from Knock-in pig #1, 2, and 3. c western blot analysis. The knock-in piglets expressed the multiple human genes like the constructed vector. NC negative control which is a normal pig; TG a newborn GT−(DAF/CD39/TFPI/C1-INH/TNFAIP3)/+ Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) piglet. Red boxes represent the exact protein sizes
Mean values of hematological parameters in the newborn cloned piglets
| Abbreviation | Units | Referencea | Multi-TG (n = 2) | Controlb (n = 2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC ( | ×103/µl | 16.8–32.4 | 1.3 ± 0.66 | 13.6 ± 0.35 |
| Neutrophils ( | ×103/µl | 7.6–24.6 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 3.77 ± 1.44 |
| Lymphocytes ( | ×103/µl | 3.42–12.7 | 0.53 ± 0.41 | 7.65 ± 1.21 |
| Monocytes | ×103/µl | 0.2–3.2 | 0.58 ± 0.25 | 1.27 ± 0.34 |
| Eosinophils ( | ×103/µl | 0.0–0.7 | 0.03 ± 0 | 0.67 ± 0.18 |
| Basophils ( | ×103/µl | 0.0–0.5 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| Platelet ( | ×103/µl | 200–800 | 74.9 ± 27.9 | 232 ± 2.8 |
| RBC | ×103/µl | 6.4–9.3 | 5.98 ± 2.59 | 7.38 ± 1.1 |
| Hemoglobin | g/dl | 11.4–13.5 | 10.19 ± 4.4 | 13.7 ± 2.47 |
| Hematocrit | % | 35–41 | 34.95 ± 15.5 | 40.3 ± 6.2 |
| Mean corpuscular volume | fl | 48.1–63.9 | 58.35 ± 0.64 | 54.7 ± 0.35 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin | pg | 13.7–18.8 | 17.0 ± 0 | 18.5 ± 0.7 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration | %/g/dl | 30.8–36 | 29.2 ± 0.28 | 33.9 ± 0.84 |
Two-tailed Student’s t test (p < 0.05)
aLaboratory Animal Medicine 2nd edition, Edited by: Fox et al., Chapter 15—Biology and Diseases of Swine
bControl: non-transgenic cloned littermates