| Literature DB >> 27553962 |
Yi-Fan Hu1,2, Chang-Pan Liu3,4,5,6,7, Nai-Yu Wang2, Shou-Chuan Shih8,9,10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa has emerged as one of the most important healthcare-associated pathogens. Colistin is regarded as the last-resort antibiotic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, but is associated with high rates of acute kidney injury. The aim of this in vitro study is to search for an alternative treatment to colistin for multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.Entities:
Keywords: Frameshift mutation; Imipenem; Porin mutation; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Rifampicin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27553962 PMCID: PMC4995756 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1785-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
MIC reduced fold-change of the multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates to various antibiotic combinations
| Antibiotic combinations | 0.03–128 mg/L ceftazidime | 0.03–128 mg/L imipenem | 0.03–128 mg/L meropenem | 0.03–128 mg/L doripenem |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 mg/L tazobactam | No differencea | No differencea | No differencea | No differencea |
| 8 mg/L phosphomycin | No differencea | No differencea | No differencea | No differencea |
| 8 mg/L sulbactam | No differencea | No differencea | No differencea | No differencea |
No differencea: No significant difference in the MIC reduced fold-change
Fig. 1The PFGE analysis of 71 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates
Percentage of the multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates that were resistant, non-resistant, sensitive to imipenem, meropenem and doripenem in the presence and absence of 20 mg/L rifampicin
| Monotherapy | Combinations with RIF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMP | MEM | DOR | IMP | MEM | DOR | |
| (a) | ||||||
| Resistanta | 100 % (65/65) | 95.38 % (62/65) | 86.15 % (56/65) | 13.85 % (9/65) | 43.08 % (28/65) | 15.38 % (10/65) |
| Non-resistantb | 0 % (0/65) | 4.62 % (3/65) | 13.85 % (9/65) | 86.15 % (56/65) | 56.92 % (37/65) | 84.62 % (55/65) |
| Sensitivec | 0 % (0/65) | 0 % (0/65) | 1.54 % (1/65) | 73.85 % (48/65) | 47.69 % (31/65) | 47.69 % (31/65) |
| (b) | ||||||
| Resistanta | 100 % (6/6) | 100 % (6/6) | 100 % (6/6) | 83.33 % (5/6) | 83.33 % (5/6) | 66.67 % (4/6) |
| Non-resistantb | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) | 16.67 % (1/6) | 16.67 % (1/6) | 33.33 % (2/6) |
| Sensitivec | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) | 0 % (0/6) |
aResistant (MIC >4 mg/L), bNon-resistant (MIC ≤4 mg/L), cSensitive (MIC ≤2 mg/L)
VIM Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase, IPM imipenem, MEM meropenem, DOR doripenem, RIF rifampicin
Fig. 2Percentage of the 65 multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates for which combined treatment with 20 mg/L rifampicin reduced the MIC compared to imipenem, meropenem or doripenem alone
Fig. 3Percentage of the 60 multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates for which combined treatment with 20 mg/L rifampicin reduced the MIC compared to imipenem, meropenem or doripenem alone, stratified by the type of porin mutation (the 21 isolates with a frameshift porin mutation; the 39 isolates with a premature stop codon porin mutation)
Fig. 4MIC values of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates to imipenem between with or without 20 mg/L rifampicin, stratified as (a) The 21 isolated with a frameshift porin mutation; (b) The 39 isolates with a premature stop codon porin mutation