| Literature DB >> 27553888 |
Alessandro Belardini1, Marco Centini1, Grigore Leahu1, David C Hooper2, Roberto Li Voti1, Eugenio Fazio1, Joseph W Haus3, Andrew Sarangan3, Ventsislav K Valev2, Concita Sibilia1.
Abstract
Extrinsic or pseudo-chiral (meta)surfaces have an achiral structure, yet they can give rise to circular dichroism when the experiment itself becomes chiral. Although these surfaces are known to yield differences in reflected and transmitted circularly polarized light, the exact mechanism of the interaction has never been directly demonstrated. Here we present a comprehensive linear and nonlinear optical investigation of a metasurface composed of tilted gold nanowires. In the linear regime, we directly demonstrate the selective absorption of circularly polarised light depending on the orientation of the metasurface. In the nonlinear regime, we demonstrate for the first time how second harmonic generation circular dichroism in such extrinsic/pseudo-chiral materials can be understood in terms of effective nonlinear susceptibility tensor elements that switch sign depending on the orientation of the metasurface. By providing fundamental understanding of the chiroptical interactions in achiral metasurfaces, our work opens up new perspectives for the optimisation of their properties.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27553888 PMCID: PMC4995466 DOI: 10.1038/srep31796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic model of the experimental sample with typical geometrical dimensions; (b) SEM image of the cross section of the sample, side view; (c) SEM image of the sample, top view; (d) schematic of the directions involved in the extrinsic chiral behaviour.
Figure 2Linear optical measurements.
(a) Reflectance spectra at a 45° angle of incidence with the wires mainly oriented perpendicular to the plane of incidence, red curve with tip of the wires oriented upward, blue curve downward (solid lines P pol., dashed lines S pol.); (b) Reflectance spectra at a 45° angle of incidence with the wires mainly oriented in the plane of incidence, green curve with tip of the wires oriented away from the incident light, black curve with tip of the wires oriented in the opposite direction (solid lines P pol., dashed lines S pol.); (c) Photoacoustic signal (PA) at 45° angle of incidence on sample with vertically oriented nanowires, red solid line with wire ends pointing up, blue dashed line for wires oppositely pointed; (d) Photoacoustic signal (PA) at 45° angle of incidence on sample with horizontal oriented nanowires, green dashed line with wire ends pointing away the incidence light, black solid line with wires in the opposite direction; (e) A comparison of photoacoustic absorbance (PA) signal and optical reflectance (OR) at 45° angle of incidence with nanowires pointing up (PA solid red line, OR dashed red line); (f) PA and OR signals with downward wires pointing down (PA solid blue line, OR dashed blue line). On the top of each panel a schematic illustration of experimental sample and laser beam orientation with respect to the nanowire orientations.
Figure 3Nonlinear measurements.
(a) SHG P-pol. signal generated in reflection configuration when the pump field impinges at 45° angle of incidence, the nanowires are oriented as indicated on the top illustrations. The lines are curve fits obtained by using Eq. 9 and the models in the method section; (b) SHG signal for sample with nanowire orientations indicated on the top illustrations. The lines are curve fits again obtained from Eq. 9 and the models in the method section. The difference in intensities between the two curves is due to the different Fresnel coefficients (see Eq. 10); (c) normalized SHG-CD measurements (see Eq. 2) as a function of the angle of incidence α; (a) red squares with nanowire ends pointed up, blue circles with nanowires oppositely oriented. The lines are guides for the eyes.