Literature DB >> 27553455

Long-term effective population size dynamics of an intensively monitored vertebrate population.

A-K Mueller1, N Chakarov1, O Krüger1, J I Hoffman1.   

Abstract

Long-term genetic data from intensively monitored natural populations are important for understanding how effective population sizes (Ne) can vary over time. We therefore genotyped 1622 common buzzard (Buteo buteo) chicks sampled over 12 consecutive years (2002-2013 inclusive) at 15 microsatellite loci. This data set allowed us to both compare single-sample with temporal approaches and explore temporal patterns in the effective number of parents that produced each cohort in relation to the observed population dynamics. We found reasonable consistency between linkage disequilibrium-based single-sample and temporal estimators, particularly during the latter half of the study, but no clear relationship between annual Ne estimates () and census sizes. We also documented a 14-fold increase in between 2008 and 2011, a period during which the census size doubled, probably reflecting a combination of higher adult survival and immigration from further afield. Our study thus reveals appreciable temporal heterogeneity in the effective population size of a natural vertebrate population, confirms the need for long-term studies and cautions against drawing conclusions from a single sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553455      PMCID: PMC5026760          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  33 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Demographic and genetic estimates of effective population size (Ne) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout.

Authors:  William R Ardren; Anne R Kapuscinski
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?

Authors:  Robin S Waples
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Estimation of effective population sizes from data on genetic markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Skeletons, noise and population growth: the end of an old debate?

Authors:  Tim Coulson; Pejman Rohani; Mercedes Pascual
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management.

Authors:  Michael K Schwartz; Gordon Luikart; Robin S Waples
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Maladaptive mate choice maintained by heterozygote advantage.

Authors:  O Krüger; J Lindström; W Amos
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Census vs. effective population size in chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects.

Authors:  J Mark Shrimpton; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): implications for conservation.

Authors:  Craig R Miller; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effective population size in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  M Husemann; F E Zachos; R J Paxton; J C Habel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.