Literature DB >> 27553110

Extracellular fluid management and hypertension in urban dwelling versus rural dwelling hemodialysis patients.

Marcello Tonelli1, Anita Lloyd2, Neesh Pannu2, Scott Klarenbach2, Pietro Ravani2, Kailash Jindal2, Jennifer MacRae2, Larry Unsworth2, Braden Manns2, Brenda Hemmelgarn2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rural-dwelling hemodialysis patients have less frequent contact with nephrologists than urban-dwelling patients, and are known to have higher mortality. We hypothesized that rural-dwelling hemodialysis patients would have more evidence of poorly controlled extracellular fluid volume (ECVF) than otherwise similar urban-dwellers.
METHODS: We studied prevalent hemodialysis patients within a single renal program in Alberta, Canada and assessed ECFV using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Our primary outcome was impedance vector length (ohm/m) as assessed by BIS using the Xitron Hydra 4200 device, where shorter vector length indicated poorer ECFV control. Because poor ECFV control can lead to hypertension, we also assessed pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure. We measured outcomes at baseline.
RESULTS: We studied 228 hemodialysis patients, of whom 115 (50.4 %) and 113 (49.6 %) were urban- and rural-dwelling, respectively. There were no differences in volume control in urban versus rural participants; odds ratio (OR) for vector length in the lowest sex-specific quartile of vector length was 0.93 (95 % CI 0.54, 1.59) after adjusting for age, sex, diabetic status, years since dialysis initiation and phase angle. The odds of very poor blood pressure control (pre-dialysis blood pressure ≥180/100) did not differ between urban and rural participants [fully adjusted OR 0.96 (0.36, 2.60)].
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in ECFV control do not appear to explain higher mortality among remote- and rural- dwelling hemodialysis patients, compared to urban-dwellers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioimpedance; Extracellular fluid volume control; Hemodialysis; Rural-dwelling; Vector length

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553110     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-016-0337-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  42 in total

1.  Association of mortality and morbidity with bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  B Di Iorio; V Bellizzi
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Detection limit of methods to assess fluid status changes in dialysis patients.

Authors:  M Kraemer; C Rode; V Wizemann
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Bioimpedance analysis of total body water in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  L T Ho; R F Kushner; D A Schoeller; R Gudivaka; D M Spiegel
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Role of systolic blood pressure in determining prognosis of hemodialyzed patients.

Authors:  J Tomita; G Kimura; T Inoue; T Inenaga; T Sanai; Y Kawano; S Nakamura; S Baba; H Matsuoka; T Omae
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  The Janus-faced aspect of 'dry weight'.

Authors:  C Chazot; B Charra; C Vo Van; G Jean; T Vanel; E Calemard; J C Terrat; M Ruffet; G Laurent
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Survival as an index of adequacy of dialysis.

Authors:  B Charra; E Calemard; M Ruffet; C Chazot; J C Terrat; T Vanel; G Laurent
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Inadequate diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension as causes of left ventricular hypertrophy in uremic dialysis patients.

Authors:  G Cannella; E Paoletti; G Ravera; P Cassottana; P Araghi; D Mulas; G Peloso; R Delfino; P Messa
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Methods and reproducibility of measurement of resistivity in the calf using regional bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  Fansan Zhu; Shubho Sarkar; Charoen Kaitwatcharachai; Roger Greenwood; Claudio Ronco; Nathan W Levin
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Vector length as a proxy for the adequacy of ultrafiltration in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Luana Pillon; Antonio Piccoli; Edmund G Lowrie; J Michael Lazarus; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Impact of volume control on left ventricular hypertrophy in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Ozkahya; Huseyin Toz; Filiz Qzerkan; Soner Duman; Ercan Ok; Ali Basci; Evert J Dorhout Mees
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.