Literature DB >> 27552516

Squeeze Me if You Can: Variability in Force Requirements to Extract a Drop From Common Glaucoma Bottles.

Daniel B Moore1, Jon D Hammer, Roozbeh Akhtari, Judy Beck, Sheila Sanders, Richard J Kryscio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the force requirements to dispense a single drop from commonly prescribed brand and generic topical glaucoma medications and correlate these findings with pinch strength in a representative patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four bottles of each medication were tested: 2 in the vertical and 2 in the horizontal orientation. Bottles were housed in a customized force gauge apparatus designed to mimic ballpoint fingertip contact with a bottle tip. For all bottles, each of the first 10 dispensed drops was tested and then tests were performed in increments of 10 until the bottle was empty. For each tested drop, the maximum force and displacement were electronically measured. Concurrently, maximum pinch strength was measured on consecutive glaucoma patients.
RESULTS: A total of 84 bottles from 21 bottle designs were tested. There was significant variability across the designs, with roughly a 7-fold (0.67 to 4.49 kgf) and 4-fold (0.81 to 3.00 kgf) difference in force requirements in the vertical and horizontal positions, respectively. Of 53 enrolled patients in the glaucoma clinic, the mean pinch strength was 5.05 (range, 1.23 to 10.4 kgf) and 4.82 (range, 1.47 to 10.67 kgf) kgf for the right and left hands, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There is statistically significant variability in the force required to squeeze a drop from common glaucoma medications, and a representative sampling of clinic patients suggests that many likely struggle with the force requirements of several bottle designs. These data further support standardization of topical glaucoma drug delivery and design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552516      PMCID: PMC5001908          DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  A model for quantifying difficulty in squeezing eyedrops from their containers.

Authors:  Ronit Nesher; Orit Ezra-Nimni; Ezra Shumla; Joshua Gur; Shaul Hamisha; Gideon Nesher
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08

3.  The Utility of Cap Color and Bottle Characteristics for Topical Glaucoma Therapy.

Authors:  Catherine M Marando; Leonard K Seibold; Jeffrey R SooHoo; Mina B Pantcheva; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Malik Y Kahook
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Improving Medication Adherence to Reduce Vision Loss in Patients with Glaucoma: Low Hanging Fruit?

Authors:  Alan R Morse
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge.

Authors:  Theodore I King
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

6.  Usability of prostaglandin monotherapy eye droppers.

Authors:  Tom Drew; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The Most Common Barriers to Glaucoma Medication Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Alan L Robin; Taylor Blachley; Karen Farris; Michele Heisler; Ken Resnicow; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Determinants of eye drop size.

Authors:  Luc Van Santvliet; Annick Ludwig
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  An objective evaluation of eyedrop instillation in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stone; Alan L Robin; Gary D Novack; David W Covert; Gerald D Cagle
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06

10.  Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Anders Heijl; Mohamed Hussein; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Eugene Komaroff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  An objective assessment of the variability in number of drops per bottle of glaucoma medication.

Authors:  Daniel B Moore; Judy Beck; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Osmoprotectants, carboxymethylcellulose and hyaluronic acid multi-ingredient eye drop: a randomised controlled trial in moderate to severe dry eye.

Authors:  M Labetoulle; F Chiambaretta; A Shirlaw; R Leaback; C Baudouin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Wide Variation of Squeezing Force and Dispensing Time Interval among Eyedropper Bottles.

Authors:  Kenji Kashiwagi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.