Literature DB >> 25761745

Usability of prostaglandin monotherapy eye droppers.

Tom Drew1, James S Wolffsohn1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the force needed to extract a drop from a range of current prostaglandin monotherapy eye droppers and how this related to the comfortable and maximum pressure subjects could exert.
METHODS: The comfortable and maximum pressure subjects could apply to an eye dropper constructed around a set of cantilevered pressure sensors and mounted above their eye was assessed in 102 subjects (mean 51.2±18.7 years), repeated three times. A load cell amplifier, mounted on a stepper motor controlled linear slide, was constructed and calibrated to test the force required to extract the first three drops from 13 multidose or unidose latanoprost medication eye droppers.
RESULTS: The pressure that could be exerted on a dropper comfortably (25.9±17.7 Newtons, range 1.2-87.4) could be exceeded with effort (to 64.8±27.1 Newtons, range 19.9-157.8; F=19.045, p<0.001), and did not differ between repeats (F=0.609, p=0.545). Comfortable and maximum pressures exerted were correlated (r=0.618, p<0.001), neither were influenced strongly by age (r=0.138, p=0.168; r=-0.118, p=0237, respectively), but were lower in women than in men (F=12.757, p=0.001). The force required to expel a drop differed between dropper designs (F=22.528, p<0.001), ranging from 6.4 Newtons to 23.4 Newtons. The force needed to exert successive drops increased (F=36.373, p<0.001) and storing droppers in the fridge further increased the force required (F=7.987, p=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Prostaglandin monotherapy droppers for glaucoma treatment vary in their resistance to extract a drop and with some a drop could not be comfortably achieved by half the population, which may affect compliance and efficacy. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma; Treatment Medical

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25761745     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Squeeze Me if You Can: Variability in Force Requirements to Extract a Drop From Common Glaucoma Bottles.

Authors:  Daniel B Moore; Jon D Hammer; Roozbeh Akhtari; Judy Beck; Sheila Sanders; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  An objective assessment of the variability in number of drops per bottle of glaucoma medication.

Authors:  Daniel B Moore; Judy Beck; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Switching to preservative-free latanoprost: impact on tolerability and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Francisco José Muñoz Negrete; Hans G Lemij; Carl Erb
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Wide Variation of Squeezing Force and Dispensing Time Interval among Eyedropper Bottles.

Authors:  Kenji Kashiwagi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.