Literature DB >> 27552227

Significance of fully automated tests for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Kenji Oku1, Olga Amengual2, Masaru Kato2, Toshiyuki Bohgaki2, Tetsuya Horita2, Shinsuke Yasuda2, Naoya Sakamoto3, Masahiro Ieko4, Gary L Norman5, Tatsuya Atsumi2.   

Abstract

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) can vary both immunologically and functionally, thus it is important to effectively and correctly identify their presence when diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome. Furthermore, since many immunological/functional tests are necessary to measure aPLs, complete examinations are often not performed in many cases due to significant burden on the testing departments. To address this issue, we measured aPLs defined according to the classification criteria (anticardiolipin antibody: aCL) IgG/IgM and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody (aβ2GPI) (IgG/IgM) as well as non-criteria antibodies (aCL IgA, aβ2GPI IgA and aβ2GPI domain I), in a cohort of 211 patients (61 APS, 140 disease controls and 10 healthy individuals). APLs were measured using a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay instrument (BIO-FLASH®/ACL AcuStar®) and with conventional ELISA tests. We demonstrated that both sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosis of aCL IgG and aβ2GPI IgG were high, in agreement with the past reports. When multiple aPLs were examined, the accuracy of diagnosis increased. The proportion of APS patients that were positive for 2 or more types of aPLs (47/61, 77%) was higher than that of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)(3/37, 9%), those with non-SLE connective tissues diseases (1/53,2%), those with other diseases or healthy volunteers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay instrument, which allows the simultaneous evaluation of many types of aPLs, offers clear advantages for a more complete, more rapid and less labor-intensive alternative to running multiple ELISA and could help in better diagnosis for suspected APS patients.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-β(2)GPI antibody; Anticardiolipin antibody; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Automated chemiluminescent immunoassay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552227     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Laboratory Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Authors:  Jasmina Ahluwalia; Sreejesh Sreedharanunni
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 2.  How to Identify High-Risk APS Patients: Clinical Utility and Predictive Values of Validated Scores.

Authors:  Kenji Oku; Olga Amengual; Shinsuke Yasuda; Tatsuya Atsumi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Determination of diagnostic threshold in harmonization and comparison of clinical utility for five major antiphospholipid antibody assays used in Japan.

Authors:  Risa Kaneshige; Yukari Motoki; Mika Yoshida; Kenji Oku; Eriko Morishita; Masahiro Ieko; Kiyoshi Ichihara; Junzo Nojima
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.124

Review 4.  The Weight of IgA Anti-β2glycoprotein I in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Pathogenesis: Closing the Gap of Seronegative Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Authors:  Oscar Cabrera-Marante; Edgard Rodríguez de Frías; Manuel Serrano; Fernando Lozano Morillo; Laura Naranjo; Francisco J Gil-Etayo; Estela Paz-Artal; Daniel E Pleguezuelo; Antonio Serrano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Immunoglobulin A Isotype of Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does Not Provide Added Value for the Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Chaojun Hu; Xi Li; Jiuliang Zhao; Qian Wang; Mengtao Li; Xinping Tian; Xiaofeng Zeng
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.