Literature DB >> 27551051

Is it best to expect the worst? Influence of patients' side-effect expectations on endocrine treatment outcome in a 2-year prospective clinical cohort study.

Y Nestoriuc1, P von Blanckenburg2, F Schuricht2, A J Barsky3, P Hadji4, U-S Albert4, W Rief2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the role of patient expectations as potentially modifiable factor of side-effects, quality of life, and adherence to endocrine treatment of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 2-year prospective clinical cohort study was conducted in routine primary care with postoperative patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, scheduled to start adjuvant endocrine treatment. Structured patient-reported assessments of side-effects, side-effect expectations, quality of life, and adherence took place during the first week post-surgery and after 3 and 24 months of endocrine treatment.
RESULTS: Of 111 enrolled patients, at 3 and 24 months, 107 and 88 patients, respectively, were assessed. After 2 years of endocrine treatment, patients reported high rates of side-effects (arthralgia: 71.3%, weight gain: 53.4%, hot flashes: 46.5%), including symptoms not directly attributable to the medication (breathing problems: 28.1%, dizziness: 25.6%). Pre-treatment expectations significantly predicted patient-reported long-term side-effects and quality of life in multivariate models controlling for relevant medical and psychological variables. Relative risk of side-effects after 2 years of endocrine treatment was higher in patients with high negative expectations at baseline than in those with low negative expectations (RR = 1.833, CI 95%, 1.032-3.256). A significant interaction confirmed this expectation effect to be particularly evident in patients with high side-effects at 3 months. Furthermore, baseline expectations were associated with adherence at 24 months (r = -0.25, P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Expectations are a genuine factor of clinical outcome from endocrine treatment for breast cancer. Negative expectations increase the risk of treatment-specific side-effects, nocebo side-effects, and non-adherence. Yet, controlled studies are needed to analyze potential causal relationships. Optimizing individual expectations might be a promising strategy to improve side-effect burden, quality of life, and adherence during longer-term drug intake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02088710.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; adverse effects; expectation; nocebo effect; psycho-oncology; quality of life

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27551051     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  33 in total

Review 1.  Role of placebo effects in pain and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Annabelle M Belcher; Sergi Ferré; Pedro E Martinez; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.067

2.  [Biosimilars and the nocebo effect].

Authors:  J Braun; S Tsiami; B Buehring; D Kiefer; I Andreica; X Baraliakos; U Kiltz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  Osteoporosis and musculoskeletal complications related to therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Suskin; Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

4.  Predictors of increased risk for early treatment non-adherence to oral anti-estrogen therapies in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Miryam Yusufov; Margo Nathan; Aleta Wiley; Julia Russell; Ann Partridge; Hadine Joffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Race and Patient-reported Symptoms in Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Report from the Women's Hormonal Initiation and Persistence Study.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Arnethea L Sutton; Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Jun He; Bassam Dahman; Megan C Edmonds; Mary Helen Hackney; Mahlet G Tadesse
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  A Brief Metric Framework for Patient Adherence to Doctor's Advice Based on Behavioral Economics.

Authors:  Senlin Lin; Yingyan Ma; Haidong Zou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Both "Vitamin L for Life" and "One Milligram of Satan": A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Exploration of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Use after Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsti I Toivonen; Devesh Oberoi; Kathryn King-Shier; Katherine-Ann L Piedalue; Joshua A Rash; Linda E Carlson; Tavis S Campbell
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  The Illness Belief Network Questionnaire: Development and Evaluation of a Psychosomatic Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Farzad Goli; Hamidreza Roohafza; Awat Feizi; Ali Gholamrezaei; Mahboubeh Farzanegan; Marsa Hashemi; Tobias Kube; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04

Review 9.  Can Psychological Expectation Models Be Adapted for Placebo Research?

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-28

10.  Association between Endocrine Therapy and Weight Gain after Breast Cancer Diagnosis among Japanese Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Koki Okumatsu; Hideko Yamauchi; Rina Kotake; Masahiko Gosho; Yoshio Nakata
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.