| Literature DB >> 27549191 |
Mame T Bakhoum1,2, Assane G Fall3, Moussa Fall3, Chiavaroli K Bassene3, Thierry Baldet4, Momar T Seck3, Jérémy Bouyer4,5, Claire Garros4, Geoffrey Gimonneau4,3,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Certain biting midges species of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are vectors of virus to livestock worldwide. Culicoides larval ecology has remained overlooked because of difficulties to identify breeding sites, methodological constraints to collect samples and lack of morphological tools to identify field-collected individuals to the species level. After the 2007 unforeseen outbreaks of African horse sickness virus (AHSV) in Senegal (West Africa), there is a need to identify suitable and productive larval habitats in horse farms for the main Culicoides species to evaluate the implementation of vector control measures or preventive actions.Entities:
Keywords: African horse sickness; Culicoides; Flotation technique; Larval habitats; Senegal
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27549191 PMCID: PMC4994380 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1749-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map of the study horse farms in the Niayes area (Senegal). Sketch map of each horse farms are represented, a Mbao farm, b Niague farm and (c) Pout farm. The distance from Lac Rose to Niague farm is 1.2 km
Fig. 2Pictures of the 12 Culicoides larval habitats investigated. The red arrow indicates where samples were collected. a Larval habitat 1 (outdoor fresh horse manure). The manure is wet, recently deposited on a heap. The manure was previously collected in horse boxes and is a mixture of sand and horse faeces. b Larval habitat 2 (outdoor old horse manure). Manure is a mixture of sand and horse faeces, partially dry and localized on a heap. c Larval habitat 3 (inside farm along protected fence). Samples were a mixture of manure and moist organic matter. d Larval habitat 4 (indoor litter soil). Solid and wet litter was collected inside horse boxes. Litter is a mix of sand and horse urine. e Larval habitat 5 (indoor humid soil). Solid and wet litter was collected inside horse boxes, under and around troughs. f Larval habitat 6 (water flow). Samples were collected at the edge of a water flow. Water resulted from washing horses and contained a lot of horse hairs, soap and organic matter (mainly faeces). Soil was sandy. g Larval habitat 7 (pond edge). Samples were collected at the interface between water and ground. Ponds were always located outside farms, with vegetation, and are used as water reserve for irrigation. Water is present all year along and soil was muddy and sandy. h Larval habitat 8 (brackish river and lake edges). Samples were collected at the interface between water and sandy soil. Water is highly polluted by riverine waste and presents a green/dark colour. i Larval habitat 9 (puddle edges). Samples were collected at the interface between water and ground. All the puddles sampled during our study results from water leak. Water was from a drilling and therefore does not contained chlorine. Soil was muddy. j Larval habitat 10 (fresh cattle dung). Samples were collected from dung deposited inside cattle boxes. k Larval habitat 11 (cattle dung heap). Samples were collected from a large cattle dung heap near the farm. Organic matter was humid. l Larval habitat 12 (liquid manure). Samples were collected from a flow channel of cattle liquid manure. It was a mix of urine and faeces
Number of flotation for each of the twelve Culicoides larval habitats investigated according to horse farm and collection session
| Number of flotation/Horse farm/Collection session | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16th September | 30th September | 15th October | 30th October | ||||||||||
| Larval habitat | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | Total |
| 1. Outdoor fresh horse manure | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10 |
| 2. Outdoor old horse manure | 2 | 5 | – | 2 | – | – | 2 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 13 |
| 3. Inside farm along protected | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 |
| 4. Indoor litter soil | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | – | 5 | 2 | – | 4 | – | – | 4 | 36 |
| 5. Indoor humid soil | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 16 |
| 6. Water flow | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 |
| 7. Pond edge | 1 | 6 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 9 | – | 1 | 5 | – | 24 |
| 8. Lake edge | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 2 | 1 | – | 6 |
| 9. Puddles edge | 4 | – | 2 | 6 | – | 5 | – | – | 4 | – | – | 3 | 24 |
| 10. Fresh cattle dung | – | 2 | – | – | – | 4 | – | 2 | 4 | – | – | 2 | 14 |
| 11. Cattle dung heap | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 2 | 7 |
| 12. Liquid manure | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 2 | 7 |
| Total | 25 | 24 | 10 | 22 | – | 22 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 161 |
Abbreviations: A horse farm of Mbao, B horse farm of Niague, C horse farm of Pout
Mean (minimum-maximum) number of Culicoides individuals emerged from substrate samples per species, site and larval habitat type
| Species/Site | Pond edge | Lake edge | Puddle edge | Total number | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aa | Bb | Ca | Ac | Ba | C | A | B | Cd | ||
|
| 49.8 (26–75) | 26.3 (3–78) | 1.3 | 10.8 (5–23) | 1.3 | – | – | – | 56.5 (16–160) | 568 |
|
| 48.5 (6–99) | 29.5 (3–54) | – | – | 1.3 | – | – | – | 11.3 (9–20) | 362 |
|
| 37.8 (11–65) | 1.5 | – | 1.5 (1–5) | 3.5 | – | – | – | 41 (3–108) | 341 |
|
| – | – | – | 10.3 (3–38) | 6.3 | – | – | – | 0.3 | 67 |
|
| 6.5 (1–22) | 2.3 (1–8) | – | 0.5 | 0.5 | – | – | – | 2.3 (1–8) | 45 |
|
| – | 3 (1–7) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3.3 (2–5) | 25 |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.3 | 5 |
|
| – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 |
|
| – | 0.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.3 | 2 |
|
| – | 0.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
Abbreviations: A horse farm of Mbao; B horse farm of Niague, C horse farm of Pout
aOne sampling site sampled
bFour to six sampling sites sampled
cOne to two sampling sites sampled
dFour to five sampling sites sampled
Sex ratio (SR) of Culicoides individuals emerged from substrate samples per species, horse farm and larval habitat type
| Pond edge | Lake edge | Puddle edge | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species/Sites | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | Total |
|
| 63 ♂/136 ♀ | 38 ♂/67 ♀ | 2 ♂/3 ♀ | 9 ♂/19 ♀ | 5 ♀ | – | – | – | 100 ♂/126 ♀ | 212 ♂/356 ♀ |
|
| 75 ♂/119 ♀ | 52 ♂/66 ♀ | – | – | 5♀ | – | – | – | 17 ♂/28 ♀ | 144 ♂/218 ♀ |
|
| 36 ♂/115 ♀ | 4 ♂/2 ♀ | – | 1 ♂/5 ♀ | 5 ♂/9 ♀ | – | – | – | 72 ♂/92 ♀ | 118 ♂/223 ♀ |
|
| – | – | – | 21 ♂/20 ♀ | 4 ♂/21 ♀ | – | – | – | 1 ♂ | 26 ♂/41 ♀ |
|
| 3 ♂/20 ♀ | 2 ♂/7 ♀ | – | 2 ♀ | 1 ♂ /1 ♀ | – | – | – | 2 ♂/7 ♀ | 8 ♂/37 ♀ |
|
| – | 2 ♂/10 ♀ | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 ♂/9 ♀ | 6 ♂/19 ♀ |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 ♂/3 ♀ | 2 ♂/ 3 ♀ |
|
| – | 4 ♀ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 ♀ |
|
| – | 1 ♂ | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 ♂ | 2 ♂ |
|
| – | 1 ♂ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 ♂ |
| Total | 177 ♂/390 ♀ | 100 ♂/156 ♀ | 2 ♂/3 ♀ | 31 ♂/46 ♀ | 10 ♂/41 ♀ | – | – | – | 199 ♂/265 ♀ | 519 ♂/901 ♀ |
Abbreviations: A horse farm of Mbao; B horse farm of Niague; C horse farm of Pout
Fig. 3Number of emerged individuals per species for each larval habitat type
Fig. 4Species composition for each larval habitat type
Fig. 5Emergence dynamics at the positive larval habitats at each horse farm according to collection session. a Mbao farm, b Niague farm and c Pout farm