| Literature DB >> 27549111 |
Yang Gao1,2, Chaolei Liu1, Yuanyuan Li1, Anpeng Zhang1, Guojun Dong1, Lihong Xie1, Bin Zhang1, Banpu Ruan1, Kai Hong1, Dawei Xue2, Dali Zeng1, Longbiao Guo1, Qian Qian1, Zhenyu Gao3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An ideal appearance is of commercial value for rice varieties. Chalkiness is one of the most important appearance quality indicators. Therefore, clarification of the heredity of chalkiness and its molecular mechanisms will contribute to reduction of rice chalkiness. Although a number of QTLs related to chalkiness were mapped, few of them have been cloned so far.Entities:
Keywords: Area of chalky endosperm; Chalkiness; Fine mapping; QTL analysis; Rice
Year: 2016 PMID: 27549111 PMCID: PMC4993740 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-016-0114-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Comparison of chalkiness between two parents and distribution of ACE, DCE and PGWC in the RIL population. a Seeds of PA64s (left) and 9311 (right). Bar =2.5 mm. b HN represents Hainan and HZ represents Hangzhou
Variations of phenotypes between parents and among RIL in Hainan and Hangzhou
| Site | Variety/Population | ACE (cm2) | DCE (%) | PGWC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hainan | 9311 | 0.18±0.03 | 2.8±0.6 | 16.0±2.8 |
| PA64s | 0.44±0.04 b | 11.7±0.8 b | 27.0±4.2 a | |
| RIL | 0.25±0.22 | 11.5±20.2 | 22.3±28.8 | |
| Hangzhou | 9311 | 0.13±0.03 | 19.0±5.0 | 20.0±4.3 |
| PA64s | 0.36±0.03 b | 54.0±8.0 b | 30.0±3.2 a | |
| RIL | 0.27±0.11 | 14.4±13.7 | 42.6±28.1 |
Mean ± SD (n = 6 for parents and n = 104 for RIL)
a and b indicate the least significant difference at 0.05 and 0.01 probability level compared with 9311 in Hainan or Hangzhou, respectively
Correlation coefficients between ACE, DCE, PGWC and GL, GW, HD
| Traits in Hainan | ACE | DCE | PGWC |
| DCE | 0.185 a | ||
| PGWC | 0.218 b | 0.980 b | |
| GL | −0.101 | 0.055 | 0.071 |
| GW | −0.155 | 0.224 a | 0.204 a |
| HD | −0.222 a | −0.047 | −0.085 |
| Traits in Hangzhou | ACE | DCE | PGWC |
| DCE | 0.428 b | ||
| PGWC | 0.460 b | 0.984 b | |
| GL | −0.130 | −0.002 | −0.019 |
| GW | 0.188 | 0.298 b | 0.301 b |
| HD | −0.035 | −0.027 | 0.002 |
a and b indicate at 5 % and 1 % significant level, respectively
QTLs for ACE, DCE and PGWC detected in RIL population in Hainan and Hangzhou
| Trait | QTL | Site | Chr. | LOD |
| Genetic distance (cM) | PEV (%) | Subst. effect | Reported QTL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACE |
| Hainan | 1 | 3.83 | 0.01 | 170.15–183.44 | 14.8 | 0.17 |
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Hainan | 9 | 3.36 | 0.01 | 7.59–13.04 | 12.2 | 0.16 | ||
|
| Hangzhou | 4 | 2.01 | 0.03 | 158.65–164.02 | 8.5 | 0.05 | ||
|
| Hangzhou | 6 | 4.01 | 0.01 | 0.00–10.92 | 16.2 | −0.09 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 6 | 3.79 | 0.03 | 10.92–22.12 | 9.2 | −0.09 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 7 | 2.09 | 0.03 | 46.03–57.36 | 5.4 | 0.05 | ||
|
| Hangzhou | 9 | 4.17 | 0.01 | 7.59–23.65 | 13.6 | 0.09 | ||
|
| Hangzhou | 12 | 2.41 | 0.01 | 121.63–135.59 | 6.8 | 0.06 |
| |
| DCE |
| Hainan | 1 | 3.43 | 0.01 | 208.31–225.92 | 11.2 | −14.17 |
|
|
| Hangzhou | 4 | 5.97 | 0.01 | 154.53–165.67 | 12.9 | 8.61 | ||
|
| Hangzhou | 6 | 11.54 | 0.01 | 15.04–21.31 | 30.6 | −13.27 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 7 | 2.72 | 0.03 | 70.43–79.87 | 5.6 | −5.66 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 9 | 2.62 | 0.01 | 0.36–12.63 | 5.2 | 5.46 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 12 | 3.19 | 0.03 | 120.28–135.59 | 6.4 | 6.07 |
| |
| PGWC |
| Hainan | 1 | 9.14 | 0.03 | 208.31–225.48 | 11.5 | −39.41 |
|
|
| Hangzhou | 4 | 7.19 | 0.01 | 158.65–166.49 | 16.3 | 24.98 | ||
|
| Hangzhou | 6 | 11.36 | 0.01 | 16.68–21.31 | 30.5 | −34.21 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 7 | 3.69 | 0.01 | 65.06–79.06 | 7.9 | −17.38 |
| |
|
| Hangzhou | 12 | 2.51 | 0.01 | 121.63–135.59 | 5.1 | 13.92 |
|
Fig. 2Locations of QTLs on SNP map. Number indicates genetic distance (cM) along each chromosome. HZ represents Hangzhou, HN represents Hainan and RD represents reported QTL
Fig. 3Fine mapping of qACE9 for ACE. a qACE9 was narrowed down to a 22 kb interval defined by markers IND9-4 and IND9-5. Values represent means ± SD. The superscript letters (a, b and c) indicate significant differences in the trait of the recombinants compared with two parents at the level of 0.01. b All the 5 predicted genes in the target region. c Structure and mutated sites of the candidate gene. Black boxes represent exons. Bold letter represent the SNPs caused the change of amino acid
Fig. 4Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of 5 predicted genes in seeds of two parents at filling stage and comparison of grain size (GL, GW and length-width ratio (LWR)), apparent amylose content (AAC) and chain-length distributions of grain amylopectins between NILqACE9 and 9311. a, b Values represent means ± SD of three independent assays. c Schematic graph of chromosomes of NILqACE9. d Values represent means ± SD of 100 grains for GL, GW and LWR, 3 independent assays for AAC. Unit for Y-axis is cm for GL and GW, and % for AAC. e Distribution of chain length distribution of grain amylopectins by FCEP method
Fig. 5Grain morphology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of starch granule structure. a, c and e from 9311; b, d and f from NILqACE9; The arrowhead in (c) and (d) represent the position of SEM images in (e) and (f); Bar represents 1 cm in (a) and (b)
Primers for InDel markers and SNP markers developed
| Primer | Forward (5′-3′) | Reverse (5′-3′) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNP9-1 | AGCATAGTTGTAAAACATGCCAGAC | TGCCGGAAAATAAATTCACCC | SNP |
| SNP9-2 | TTCGTATTTTATAGAACAGAGGG | TGTGTGCTAAGAACACAAAGG | SNP |
| IND9-3 | CAGTATATGTGACGGAGCTATTTTC | ATTATCCTTGGTTATACACCG | InDel |
| IND9-4 | CCAACCTCCAAGACTAGATGAAGTT | AACATTACTTGTGGGCTCTTG | InDel |
| IND9-5 | TTTGATCGGACAATTTGTTT | AAAAACCGGAAAAAGAAAAG | InDel |
| IND9-6 | TAGATGGGCCAGTTCAAATTG | ACCATATGTTTTTACATTTGATTGC | InDel |
Primers for real time PCR analysis
| Primer | Forward (5′-3′) | Reverse (5′-3′) | Gene |
|---|---|---|---|
| RT-62 | CTGCAGGCGAAGAAGGAT | GTGATCACCGTGTAGTTCGC | LOC_Os09g12620 |
| RT-63 | TACTACGCCTCGGTGGAGA | TCCGGGTAGACGTCGAAT | LOC_Os09g12630 |
| RT-64 | ACGTGGATTCAGCCAAATG | AATGGCAAGATCTCCGTAGG | LOC_Os09g12640 |
| RT-65 | ACATGCGCAAATATGGTTGT | CCAGAGAACACCACACCAAC | LOC_Os09g12650 |
| RT-66 | ATTCAGGCCCACAGAGAAAC | TGATCCTCCCTTCATCATCA | LOC_Os09g12660 |
| Actin | CCATTGGTGCTGAGCGTTT | CGCAGCTTCCATTCCTATGAA | LOC_Os03g50885 |