Literature DB >> 27547527

DNA barcode data accurately assign higher spider taxa.

Jonathan A Coddington1, Ingi Agnarsson2, Ren-Chung Cheng3, Klemen Čandek3, Amy Driskell1, Holger Frick4, Matjaž Gregorič3, Rok Kostanjšek5, Christian Kropf4, Matthew Kweskin1, Tjaša Lokovšek3, Miha Pipan6, Nina Vidergar3, Matjaž Kuntner7.   

Abstract

The use of unique DNA sequences as a method for taxonomic identification is no longer fundamentally controversial, even though debate continues on the best markers, methods, and technology to use. Although both existing databanks such as GenBank and BOLD, as well as reference taxonomies, are imperfect, in best case scenarios "barcodes" (whether single or multiple, organelle or nuclear, loci) clearly are an increasingly fast and inexpensive method of identification, especially as compared to manual identification of unknowns by increasingly rare expert taxonomists. Because most species on Earth are undescribed, a complete reference database at the species level is impractical in the near term. The question therefore arises whether unidentified species can, using DNA barcodes, be accurately assigned to more inclusive groups such as genera and families-taxonomic ranks of putatively monophyletic groups for which the global inventory is more complete and stable. We used a carefully chosen test library of CO1 sequences from 49 families, 313 genera, and 816 species of spiders to assess the accuracy of genus and family-level assignment. We used BLAST queries of each sequence against the entire library and got the top ten hits. The percent sequence identity was reported from these hits (PIdent, range 75-100%). Accurate assignment of higher taxa (PIdent above which errors totaled less than 5%) occurred for genera at PIdent values >95 and families at PIdent values ≥ 91, suggesting these as heuristic thresholds for accurate generic and familial identifications in spiders. Accuracy of identification increases with numbers of species/genus and genera/family in the library; above five genera per family and fifteen species per genus all higher taxon assignments were correct. We propose that using percent sequence identity between conventional barcode sequences may be a feasible and reasonably accurate method to identify animals to family/genus. However, the quality of the underlying database impacts accuracy of results; many outliers in our dataset could be attributed to taxonomic and/or sequencing errors in BOLD and GenBank. It seems that an accurate and complete reference library of families and genera of life could provide accurate higher level taxonomic identifications cheaply and accessibly, within years rather than decades.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcoding; Family; Genome; Genus; Global Genome Initiative; Taxonomic impediment

Year:  2016        PMID: 27547527      PMCID: PMC4958005          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


Introduction

Accurate identification of biological specimens has always limited the application of biological data to important societal problems. Obstacles are well-known and difficult: the vast majority of species are undescribed scientifically (Erwin, 1982; May, 1992; Mora et al., 2011); some unknown but large fraction of higher taxa are not monophyletic (Goloboff et al., 2009; Pyron & Wiens, 2011); many species can only be identified if certain life stages are available, e.g., adults (Coddington & Levi, 1991), classical data sources such as morphology imperfectly track species identity; the discipline of taxonomy continues to dwindle (Agnarsson & Kuntner, 2007); the classical process of taxonomic identification is mostly manual and cannot scale to provide the amounts of data required for real-time decisions such as environmental monitoring, invasive species, climate change, etc. DNA sequence data potentially can eliminate most of these obstacles. DNA barcoding uses a fragment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (CO1) as a unique species diagnosis/identification tool in the animal kingdom (Hebert et al., 2003), with analogous single to several locus protocols applied for vascular plants, ferns, mosses, algae and fungi (Saunders, 2005; Kress & Erickson, 2007; Nitta, 2008; Chase & Fay, 2009; Liu et al., 2010), protists (Scicluna, Tawari & Clark, 2006), and prokaryotes (Barraclough et al., 2009). Due to relative ease and inexpensive sequencing, DNA barcoding is a popular tool in species identification and taxonomic applications (e.g., Doña et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015; see also Collins & Cruickshank, 2013), and the method is no longer fundamentally controversial at the species level (Pentinsaari, Hebert & Mutanen, 2014; Lopardo & Uhl, 2014; Čandek & Kuntner, 2015; Anslan & Tedersoo, 2015; Wang et al., 2015). While most species remain undescribed, the situation is not so dire for larger monophyletic groups such as clades accorded the Linnaean ranks of genus or family. In assessing the state of knowledge about biodiversity, it is important to distinguish between the first scientific discovery of an exemplar of a lineage, and phylogenetic understanding of that lineage. Phylogenetic understanding—both tree topology and consequent taxonomic changes, are research programs with no clear end in sight. Linnaean rank is partially arbitrary, and one expects that the number of higher taxa will probably increase over time as understanding improves. Discovery, however, can have an objective definition: the year of the earliest formal taxonomic description of a member of the lineage or taxonomic group in which it is currently included. By this definition the earliest possible discovery of an animal lineage is 1758 (Linnaeus, 1758), or in the case of spiders, 1757 (Clerck, 1757). More illuminating are the latest discoveries of lineages with the rank of family within larger clades, because the data tell us something about progress towards broad scale knowledge of biodiversity. The species representing the most recent discovery of a family of birds, for example, is the Broad-billed Sapayoa, Sapayoa aenigma Hunt, 1903 (Sapayoaidae). The species representing the most recently discovered mammal family is Kitti’s hog-nosed bat, Craseonycteris thonglongyai Hill, 1974 (Craseonycteridae). For flowering plants, it is Gomortega keule (Molina) Baill, 1972 (Gomertegaceae). For bees, it is Stenotritus elegans Smith, 1853 (Stenotritidae). For spiders, a megadiverse and poorly known group, it is Trogloraptor marchingtoni Griswold, Audisio & Ledford, 2012 (Trogloraptoridae), but the second most recent discovery of an unambiguously new spider family was in 1955, Gradungulidae (Forster, 1955). Figure 1 illustrates the tempo of first discovery of families for these five well-known clades. At the family level, these curves are essentially asymptotic, implying that science is close to completing the inventory of clades ranked as families for these large lineages. On the other hand, for Bacteria and Archaea (Fig. 1), as one would expect, the curve is not asymptotic at all but sharply increasing; prokaryote discovery and understanding is obviously just beginning.
Figure 1

First discovery of major clades of life.

Accumulation curve of dates of first discovery (year of first description of a contained species) of families for six major clades of life, 1758–2010.

First discovery of major clades of life.

Accumulation curve of dates of first discovery (year of first description of a contained species) of families for six major clades of life, 1758–2010. In fact, although many new eukaryote families are named every year, the vast majority of these new names result from advances in phylogenetic understanding, not biological discovery of major new forms of life. The last ten years of Zoological Record suggests that roughly 5–10 truly new families are discovered per year. In the context of the above question—approximate taxonomic assignment of organisms using DNA sequences—these data suggest that our knowledge of major clades of life is approaching completion. The Global Genome Initiative (GGI; http://ggi.si.edu/) of the Smithsonian Institution via the GGI Knowledge Portal (http://ggi.eol.org/) has tabulated a complete list of families of life, which total 9,650—on the whole a surprisingly small number. 10,000 barcodes, more or less, seems like a feasible goal. If we were able to assemble a complete database of DNA sequences at the family level, would it suffice to identify any eukaryote on Earth to the family level? While the literature on species identification success of DNA barcodes comprises thousands of studies, only a few have tested their effectiveness at the level of higher taxonomic units. In the seminal paper on DNA barcodes, Hebert et al. (2003) established that animal CO1 sequences can roughly assign taxa to phyla (96% success) or orders (100% success). However, their test was based on a neighbor joining tree-building approach, and it remained unknown if sequence data itself, i.e., percent identity among taxa, can be used in this way. Similarly, Nagy et al. (2012) showed that DNA barcoding in reptiles usually correctly assigned barcodes to species, genus and family. Their approach was phylogenetic: they tested whether including a sequence in tree building rendered the higher group non-monophyletic, which would imply failure. Finally, Wilson et al. (2011) provided a similar tree based test in sphingid moths, and established reliabilities of correct generic and subfamily taxonomic assignments between 74 and 90% using a liberal, and only 66–84% using a strict, tree-based criterion. These authors argued that tree-based methods perform better than sequence comparison methods, but that reliability, of course, depends on the library completeness. Our project not only contributes original DNA barcode data for Central European spiders, but also works in synergy with the GGI towards a permanent preservation of genomic biodiversity: the formation of a collection of deeply frozen spider tissues and their DNA. We provide: (1) cryo-preserved tissues of reliably identified species of Central European spiders, and their vouchers photographed and deposited in public museums; (2) permanently frozen genomic DNA of these species; (3) publicly accessible DNA barcodes for these species (genetic sequence of cytochrome oxidase I—CO1) as public identification tool (Hebert et al., 2003) to facilitate organism identification, taxonomy, ecology and conservation. In addition, this project addresses to what extent higher level taxonomic units can be reliably identified using barcodes of unknown spiders, and specifically asks what percent sequence identity in BLAST results is necessary to correctly identify unknown taxa to the Linnaean genus and/or family. Other methods for classification of higher-level taxonomies such as RDP (Wang et al., 2007), UTAX (Edgar, 2010) and MEGAN (Huson et al., 2007) have primarily been developed for studies of microorganisms, using genetic markers for these groups, but less is known about using the CO1 barcoding gene in metazoans. We examine empirical data from Araneae barcode data to ask what is the percent sequence identity value above which 5% or less of higher level (genus/family) taxonomic identifications are incorrect and the extent to which frequency of correct identifications correlated with the number of taxa in this dataset, as would be expected given the dependence of BLAST on the reference database.

Materials & Methods

Specimen processing and imaging

We used automated and manual sampling methods for collecting spiders in the field in numerous localities in Slovenia and Switzerland. Faunistic and sampling details are published elsewhere (Čandek et al., 2013; see also 2015 corrigendum). Collected spiders were fixed in absolute ethanol immediately after being caught and the ethanol was replaced on the following day. Spiders were frozen at −80 °C, same day, or as soon as possible. In the laboratory they were identified, labeled, photographed and processed for DNA extraction and sequencing (Čandek et al., 2013; see also 2015 corrigendum). Voucher specimens (voucher codes starting with 0078) are deposited at National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (Washington D.C., USA), with duplicates (voucher codes starting with ARA) at Naturhistorisches Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern (Switzerland) and EZ LAB, ZRC SAZU (Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voucher images are published along with their barcodes (see Table 1) at http://ezlab.zrc-sazu.si/dna. All original sequences generated by this project have been submitted to BOLD systems, and those that BOLD accepted were also submitted to GenBank (Table 1).
Table 1

Original sequences this project submitted to BOLD and GenBank (only those on GenBank are also publically available on BOLD, for all others, see http://ezlab.zrc-sazu.si/dna/).

FamilyGenusSpeciesSample IDProcess IDGenBank accession numberVoucher stored atCollected in
AgelenidaeAgelenalabyrinthica00786574SPSLO002-12MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeAgelenalabyrinthicaARA0239SPSLO369-13EZ LABSVN
AgelenidaeAllagelenagracilens00786557SPSLO001-12 KX039062 MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeCoelotesterrestris00786563SPSLO003-12 KX039130 MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeHistoponatorpida00786599SPSLO004-12 KX039207 MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeHistoponatorpidaARA0063SPSLO339-13 KX039208 EZ LABSVN
AgelenidaeInermocoelotesanoplus00786586SPSLO005-12 KX039220 MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeInermocoelotesanoplusARA0339SPSLO392-13 KX039219 EZ LABSVN
AgelenidaeMalthonicasilvestris00786304SPSLO283-13 KX039239 MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeMalthonicasilvestrisARA0427SPSLO468-13 KX039238 EZ LABSVN
AgelenidaeTegenariaatrica00786583SPSLO006-12 KX039170 MNH, SISVN
AgelenidaeTegenariaatricaARA0076SPSLO341-13 KX039169 EZ LABSVN
AmaurobiidaeAmaurobiuserberi00786571SPSLO007-12 KX039070 MNH, SISVN
AmaurobiidaeAmaurobiuserberiARA0120SPSLO347-13 KX039069 EZ LABSVN
AmaurobiidaeAmaurobiusfenestralis00786389SPSLO189-12 KX039071 MNH, SICHE
AmaurobiidaeAmaurobiusferox00786307SPSLO284-13 KX039072 MNH, SISVN
AmaurobiidaeAmaurobiusjugorum00786585SPSLO008-12 KX039073 MNH, SISVN
AnyphaenidaeAnyphaenaaccentuata00786584SPSLO009-12 KX039076 MNH, SISVN
AnyphaenidaeAnyphaenasabina00786551SPSLO010-12 KX039077 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAculepeiraceropegia00786570SPSLO011-12 KX039041 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAculepeiraceropegiaARA0355SPSLO405-13 KX039040 NMBECHE
AraneidaeAgalenatearedii00786368SPSLO095-12 KX039043 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAgalenatearediiARA0381SPSLO429-13 KX039042 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeAraneusalsine00786568SPSLO012-12 KX039079 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraneusangulatus00786552SPSLO013-12 KX039081 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraneusangulatusARA0001SPSLO326-13 KX039080 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeAraneusdiadematus00786593SPSLO014-12 KX039083 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraneusdiadematusARA0050SPSLO336-13 KX039082 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeAraneusmarmoreus00786575SPSLO015-12 KX039085 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraneusmarmoreusARA0030SPSLO329-13 KX039084 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeAraneusquadratus00786572SPSLO016-12 KX039086 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraneusquadratusARA0198SPSLO362-13 KX039087 NMBECHE
AraneidaeAraneussturmi00786561SPSLO017-12 KX039089 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraneussturmiARA0108SPSLO345-13 KX039088 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeAraniellacucurbitina00786596SPSLO018-12 KX039090 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeAraniellaopisthographaARA0393SPSLO440-13 KX039091 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeArgiopebruennichi00786589SPSLO019-12 KX039093 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeArgiopebruennichiARA0048SPSLO335-13 KX039094 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeCercidiaprominens00786498SPSLO021-12 KX039116 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeCercidiaprominens00786577SPSLO020-12 KX039114 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeCercidiaprominensARA0356SPSLO406-13 KX039115 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeCyclosaconica00786573SPSLO022-12 KX039135 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeCyclosaconicaARA0380SPSLO428-13 KX039136 NMBECHE
AraneidaeGibbaraneabituberculata00786579SPSLO023-12 KX039186 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeGibbaraneabituberculataARA0350SPSLO400-13 KX039187 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeHypsosingaalbovittata00786323SPSLO191-12 KX039211 MNH, SICHE
AraneidaeHypsosingapygmaea00786555SPSLO024-12 KX039212 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeHypsosingasanguinea00786314SPSLO285-13 KX039213 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeHypsosingasanguineaARA0370SPSLO419-13 KX039214 NMBECHE
AraneidaeLarinioidessclopetarius00786382SPSLO096-12 KX039222 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeLeviellusthorelli00786591SPSLO025-12 KX039229 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeLeviellusthorelliARA0353SPSLO403-13 KX039228 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeMangoraacalypha00786590SPSLO026-12 KX039242 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeMangoraacalyphaARA0107SPSLO344-13 KX039240 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeMangoraacalyphaARA0357SPSLO407-13 KX039241 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeNeosconaadianta00786330SPSLO192-12 KX039282 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeNucteneaumbratica00786594SPSLO027-12 KX039293 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeNucteneaumbraticaARA0387SPSLO435-13 KX039292 NMBECHE
AraneidaeParazygiellamontana00786582SPSLO028-12 KX039307 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeParazygiellamontanaARA0354SPSLO404-13 KX039308 NMBECHE
AraneidaeSinganitidula00786597SPSLO029-12 KX039376 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeStroemiellusstroemiARA0169SPSLO358-13 KX039383 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeZilladiodia00786481SPSLO097-12 KX039446 MNH, SISVN
AraneidaeZilladiodiaARA0342SPSLO393-13 KX039447 EZ LABSVN
AraneidaeZygiellax-notata00786326SPSLO193-12 KX039450 MNH, SICHE
AtypidaeAtypuspiceus00786580SPSLO031-12 KX039096 MNH, SISVN
AtypidaeAtypuspiceusARA0174SPSLO359-13 KX039097 EZ LABSVN
ClubionidaeClubionagermanica00786566SPSLO032-12 KX039122 MNH, SISVN
ClubionidaeClubionakulczynskii00786404SPSLO194-12 KX039123 MNH, SICHE
ClubionidaeClubionaneglecta00786558SPSLO033-12 KX039124 MNH, SISVN
ClubionidaeClubionapseudoneglecta00786286SPSLO286-13 KX039125 MNH, SISVN
ClubionidaeClubionareclusa00786378SPSLO195-12 KX039126 MNH, SICHE
ClubionidaeClubionareclusaARA0371SPSLO420-13 KX039127 NMBECHE
ClubionidaeClubionaterrestris00786457SPSLO098-12 KX039129 MNH, SISVN
ClubionidaeClubionaterrestrisARA0242SPSLO371-13 KX039128 EZ LABSVN
CorinnidaePhrurolithusminimus00786559SPSLO034-12 KX039341 MNH, SISVN
DictynidaeArgennasubnigra00786283SPSLO288-13MNH, SISVN
DictynidaeCicurinacicur00786548SPSLO035-12 KX039121 MNH, SISVN
DictynidaeDictynaarundinacea00786369SPSLO196-12 KX039140 MNH, SICHE
DictynidaeDictynaarundinaceaARA0379SPSLO427-13 KX039139 NMBECHE
DictynidaeDictynacivica00786511SPSLO036-12 KX039141 MNH, SISVN
DictynidaeDictynauncinata00786345SPSLO197-12 KX039143 MNH, SISVN
DictynidaeDictynauncinataARA0423SPSLO466-13 KX039142 EZ LABSVN
DictynidaeLathyshumilis00786473SPSLO198-12 KX039224 MNH, SISVN
DictynidaeLathyshumilis00786550SPSLO037-12 KX039223 MNH, SISVN
DysderidaeDasumiacanestrinii00786581SPSLO038-12 KX039137 MNH, SISVN
DysderidaeDysderaadriatica00786287SPSLO289-13 KX039154 MNH, SISVN
DysderidaeDysderaadriatica00786296SPSLO290-13 KX039155 MNH, SISVN
DysderidaeDysderaninniiARA0244SPSLO373-13 KX039156 EZ LABSVN
FilistatidaeFilistatainsidiatrix00786560SPSLO040-12 KX039181 MNH, SISVN
FilistatidaeFilistatainsidiatrixARA0122SPSLO348-13 KX039182 EZ LABSVN
GnaphosidaeAphantaulaxcincta00786470SPSLO199-12 KX039078 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeCallilepisschuszteri00786553SPSLO041-12 KX039103 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeCallilepisschuszteriARA0333SPSLO386-13 KX039102 EZ LABSVN
GnaphosidaeDrassodeslapidosus00786505SPSLO099-12 KX039150 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeDrassodespubescens00786273SPSLO291-13 KX039151 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeDrassyllusvillicus00786556SPSLO042-12 KX039153 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeDrassyllusvillicusARA0337SPSLO390-13 KX039152 EZ LABSVN
GnaphosidaeGnaphosabicolor00786276SPSLO292-13 KX039188 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeHaplodrassussilvestris00786578SPSLO043-12 KX039196 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeMicariaaenea00786384SPSLO200-12 KX039258 MNH, SICHE
GnaphosidaeMicariapulicaria00786274SPSLO293-13 KX039259 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeNomisiaexornata00786564SPSLO044-12 KX039291 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaePhaeocedusbraccatus00786592SPSLO045-12 KX039330 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeScotophaeusscutulatus00786576SPSLO046-12 KX039369 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeScotophaeusscutulatusARA0082SPSLO343-13 KX039370 EZ LABSVN
GnaphosidaeTrachyzelotespedestris00786279SPSLO294-13 KX039419 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeZelotesapricorum00786278SPSLO295-13 KX039441 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeZeloteslatreillei00786540SPSLO047-12 KX039443 MNH, SISVN
GnaphosidaeZeloteslatreilleiARA0191SPSLO360-13 KX039442 EZ LABSVN
GnaphosidaeZelotessubterraneus00786588SPSLO048-12 KX039445 MNH, SICHE
GnaphosidaeZelotessubterraneusARA0156SPSLO355-13 KX039444 NMBECHE
HahniidaeAntisteaelegans00786405SPSLO201-12 KX039075 MNH, SICHE
HahniidaeAntisteaelegansARA0384SPSLO432-13 KX039074 NMBECHE
HahniidaeHahniadifficilis00786363SPSLO202-12 KX039195 MNH, SICHE
HahniidaeHahniadifficilisARA0399SPSLO445-13 KX039194 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeAgnyphantesexpunctus00786328SPSLO203-12 KX039044 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgnyphantesexpunctusARA0429SPSLO470-13 KX039045 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetaaffinis00786439SPSLO115-12 KX039049 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetaaffinisARA0245SPSLO374-13 KX039048 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetaalpica00786443SPSLO116-12 KX039050 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetacauta00786426SPSLO204-12 KX039052 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetacautaARA0225SPSLO367-13 KX039051 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetaconigera00786448SPSLO100-12 KX039053 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetafuscipalpa00786425SPSLO218-12MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetafuscipalpaARA0268SPSLO378-13NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetagulosa00786464SPSLO219-12 KX039054 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetainnotabilis00786393SPSLO220-12 KX039055 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetaorites00786419SPSLO221-12 KX039057 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetaoritesARA0403SPSLO449-13 KX039056 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetarurestris00786411SPSLO117-12 KX039058 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeAgynetarurestrisARA0419SPSLO462-13 KX039059 EZ LABSVN
LinyphiidaeAgynetasaxatilis00786277SPSLO298-13 KX039060 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeAgynetasimplicitarsis00786295SPSLO299-13 KX039061 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeBolyphantesalticeps00786465SPSLO205-12MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeBolyphantesluteolus00786397SPSLO101-12 KX039101 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeBolyphantesluteolusARA0214SPSLO366-13 KX039100 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeCaracladusavicula00786474SPSLO206-12 KX039104 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeCaracladusaviculaARA0231SPSLO368-13 KX039105 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeCaracladuszamoniensis00786441SPSLO102-12 KX039106 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeCentromeruspabulator00786451SPSLO207-12 KX039108 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeCentromeruspabulatorARA0421SPSLO464-13 KX039107 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeCentromerussubalpinus00786412SPSLO208-12 KX039110 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeCentromerussubalpinusARA0250SPSLO375-13 KX039109 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeCeratinellabrevipes00786317SPSLO234-12 KX039112 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeCeratinellabrevipes00786450SPSLO103-12 KX039113 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeCeratinellabrevipesARA0363SPSLO413-13 KX039111 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeDiplocephaluscrassilobus00786294SPSLO296-13 KX039144 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeDiplocephaluslatifrons00786461SPSLO209-12 KX039145 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeDiplostylaconcolor00786533SPSLO049-12 KX039146 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeDrapetiscasocialis00786587SPSLO050-12 KX039149 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeDrapetiscasocialisARA0405SPSLO451-13 KX039148 EZ LABSVN
LinyphiidaeEntelecaraacuminata00786460SPSLO210-12 KX039164 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeErigoneatraARA0257SPSLO377-13 KX039171 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeErigonedentipalpisARA0256SPSLO376-13 KX039172 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeErigoneremota00786416SPSLO107-12 KX039174 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeErigonellaignobilisARA0164SPSLO357-13 KX039173 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeFloroniabucculenta00786545SPSLO051-12 KX039183 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeFrontinellinafrutetorum00786567SPSLO052-12 KX039184 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeFrontinellinafrutetorumARA0441SPSLO480-13 KX039185 EZ LABSVN
LinyphiidaeGonatiumhilare00786565SPSLO053-12 KX039189 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeGonatiumrubellum00786318SPSLO212-12 KX039191 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeGonatiumrubellumARA0386SPSLO434-13 KX039190 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeGonatiumrubens00786331SPSLO213-12 KX039192 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeGonatiumrubensARA0358SPSLO408-13 KX039193 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeImprophantesnitidus00786449SPSLO109-12 KX039218 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeIncestophantesfrigidusARA0211SPSLO364-13NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeKaestneriadorsalis00786598SPSLO054-12 KX039221 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeLepthyphantesleprosus00786342SPSLO214-12 KX039225 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeLepthyphantesnodiferARA0433SPSLO473-13 KX039226 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeLinyphiahortensis00786526SPSLO112-12 KX039230 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeLinyphiahortensisARA0397SPSLO443-13 KX039231 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeLinyphiatriangularis00786547SPSLO056-12 KX039232 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeLinyphiatriangularisARA0004SPSLO327-13 KX039233 EZ LABSVN
LinyphiidaeMacrargusrufusARA0213SPSLO365-13 KX039237 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMansuphantesfragilis00786415SPSLO114-12 KX039243 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMansuphantesfragilisARA0276SPSLO380-13 KX039244 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMasosundevalli00786400SPSLO216-12 KX039248 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMasosundevalliARA0360SPSLO410-13 KX039247 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMegalepthyphantescollinus00786569SPSLO057-12 KX039249 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeMermessustrilobatus00786395SPSLO118-12 KX039250 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeMetopobactrusprominulus00786437SPSLO119-12 KX039257 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMicrargusalpinusARA0270SPSLO379-13 KX039260 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMicrargusherbigradus00786466SPSLO223-12 KX039261 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMicroctenonyxsubitaneus00786463SPSLO224-12 KX039262 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMicrolinyphiaimpigra00786350SPSLO228-12 KX039263 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMicrolinyphiaimpigraARA0369SPSLO418-13 KX039264 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMicrolinyphiapusilla00786417SPSLO225-12 KX039265 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMiniciamarginella00786371SPSLO120-12 KX039267 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeMiniciamarginellaARA0410SPSLO455-13 KX039268 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMinyrioluspusillusARA0285SPSLO382-13 KX039269 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMughiphantescornutusARA0372SPSLO421-13 KX039272 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMughiphantesmughi00786319SPSLO227-12 KX039274 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMughiphantesmughi00786322SPSLO217-12 KX039275 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeMughiphantesmughiARA0361SPSLO411-13 KX039273 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeMughiphantesmughiARA0411SPSLO456-13 KX039276 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeNematogmussanguinolentus00786490SPSLO162-12 KX039279 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeNematogmussanguinolentusARA0359SPSLO409-13 KX039278 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeNerieneclathrataARA0352SPSLO402-13 KX039287 EZ LABSVN
LinyphiidaeNerienefurtiva00786471SPSLO229-12 KX039289 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeNerienefurtivaARA0145SPSLO353-13 KX039288 EZ LABSVN
LinyphiidaeNerieneradiataARA0152SPSLO354-13 KX039290 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeObscuriphantesobscurus00786354SPSLO231-12 KX039295 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeObscuriphantesobscurusARA0407SPSLO453-13 KX039294 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeOedothoraxgibbifer00786396SPSLO232-12 KX039296 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeOryphantesangulatusARA0398SPSLO444-13NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeOsteariusmelanopygius00786339SPSLO122-12 KX039297 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaePalliduphantespallidus00786341SPSLO233-12 KX039302 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaePanamomopstauricornisARA0375SPSLO424-13 KX039303 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaePityohyphantesphrygianus00786316SPSLO236-12 KX039351 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaePityohyphantesphrygianusARA0347SPSLO397-13 KX039352 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaePocadicnemisjuncea00786421SPSLO237-12 KX039354 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaePocadicnemisjunceaARA0409SPSLO454-13 KX039355 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaePocadicnemispumila00786422SPSLO238-12 KX039356 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaePorrhommapallidum00786410SPSLO239-12 KX039357 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaePorrhommapygmaeum00786292SPSLO301-13MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeScotinotylusalpigena00786444SPSLO125-12 KX039367 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeScotinotylusalpigenaARA0163SPSLO356-13 KX039366 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeScotinotylusclavatus00786420SPSLO240-12 KX039368 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeSilometopuselegans00786409SPSLO126-12 KX039373 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTapinocybaaffinis00786406SPSLO127-12 KX039387 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTapinocybaaffinisARA0362SPSLO412-13 KX039386 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesalacris00786343SPSLO241-12 KX039389 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesalacrisARA0420SPSLO463-13 KX039388 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantescristatus00786305SPSLO302-13 KX039390 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantescristatusARA0418SPSLO461-13 KX039391 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesflavipes00786528SPSLO060-12 KX039392 MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesflavipesARA0336SPSLO389-13 KX039393 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesjacksoni00786356SPSLO242-12MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesjacksoni00786430SPSLO128-12MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesjacksoniARA0435SPSLO475-13NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesjacksonoidesARA0374SPSLO423-13 KX039394 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesmengei00786301SPSLO300-13 KX039396 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesmengei00786413SPSLO243-12 KX039397 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantesmengeiARA0415SPSLO459-13 KX039395 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantestenebricola00786418SPSLO244-12 KX039398 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantestenebricolaARA0414SPSLO458-13 KX039399 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTenuiphantestenuis00786383SPSLO129-12MNH, SISVN
LinyphiidaeTisoaestivusARA0422SPSLO465-13 KX039413 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeTisovagans00786351SPSLO246-12 KX039414 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeTisovagansARA0401SPSLO447-13 KX039415 NMBECHE
LinyphiidaeWalckenaeriaantica00786429SPSLO130-12 KX039421 MNH, SICHE
LinyphiidaeWalckenaeriafurcillata00786431SPSLO131-12 KX039422 MNH, SICHE
LiocranidaeAgroecabrunnea00786320SPSLO247-12 KX039046 MNH, SISVN
LiocranidaeAgroecabrunneaARA0392SPSLO439-13 KX039047 EZ LABSVN
LiocranidaeLiocranumrupicola00786516SPSLO061-12 KX039234 MNH, SISVN
LiphistiidaeLiphistiusspARA0240SPSLO482-15 KX039235 EZ LABMYS
LycosidaeAlopecosaaccentuata00786365SPSLO248-12MNH, SICHE
LycosidaeAlopecosapulverulenta00786527SPSLO063-12 KX039064 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeAlopecosapulverulentaARA0349SPSLO399-13 KX039063 NMBECHE
LycosidaeAlopecosasulzeri00786452SPSLO249-12 KX039065 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeAlopecosataeniata00786538SPSLO062-12 KX039066 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaeAlopecosatrabalis00786509SPSLO064-12 KX039067 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeAlopecosatrabalisARA0438SPSLO478-13 KX039068 EZ LABSVN
LycosidaeArctosafulvolineata00786336SPSLO250-12MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeArctosalutetiana00786407SPSLO132-12MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeArctosamaculata00786312SPSLO305-13 KX039092 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeAuloniaalbimana00786524SPSLO133-12 KX039099 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeAuloniaalbimanaARA0338SPSLO391-13 KX039098 EZ LABSVN
LycosidaeHognaradiata00786502SPSLO065-12 KX039210 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeHognaradiataARA0368SPSLO417-13 KX039209 EZ LABSVN
LycosidaePardosaagrestis00786385SPSLO134-12 KX039309 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosaamentata00786337SPSLO251-12 KX039311 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosaamentataARA0413SPSLO457-13 KX039310 NMBECHE
LycosidaePardosabifasciata00786453SPSLO252-12 KX039312 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosablanda00786358SPSLO253-12 KX039314 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaePardosablandaARA0345SPSLO396-13 KX039313 NMBECHE
LycosidaePardosacf. lugubris00786529SPSLO066-12 KX039316 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaePardosacf. lugubrisARA0065SPSLO340-13 KX039315 EZ LABSVN
LycosidaePardosaferruginea00786309SPSLO306-13 KX039317 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaePardosahortensis00786289SPSLO307-13 KX039318 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosaoreophila00786310SPSLO308-13 KX039319 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaePardosaoreophila00786321SPSLO254-12 KX039320 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaePardosaoreophilaARA0348SPSLO398-13 KX039321 NMBECHE
LycosidaePardosapalustris00786514SPSLO067-12 KX039323 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosapalustrisARA0406SPSLO452-13 KX039322 NMBECHE
LycosidaePardosaproxima00786311SPSLO309-13 KX039324 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosariparia00786315SPSLO310-13 KX039326 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePardosaripariaARA0243SPSLO372-13 KX039325 NMBECHE
LycosidaePiratapiraticus00786375SPSLO255-12 KX039346 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaePiratapiraticusARA0430SPSLO471-13 KX039347 NMBECHE
LycosidaePiratulahygrophila00786388SPSLO135-12 KX039348 MNH, SISVN
LycosidaePiratulaknorri00786402SPSLO136-12MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeTrochosaspinipalpis00786344SPSLO137-12MNH, SISVN
LycosidaeTrochosaspinipalpisARA0388SPSLO436-13EZ LABSVN
LycosidaeXerolycosanemoralis00786541SPSLO068-12 KX039424 MNH, SICHE
LycosidaeXerolycosanemoralisARA0335SPSLO388-13 KX039423 NMBECHE
MimetidaeErofurcata00786390SPSLO256-12 KX039175 MNH, SICHE
MiturgidaeCheiracanthiumerraticum00786367SPSLO138-12 KX039117 MNH, SISVN
MiturgidaeCheiracanthiummildei00786355SPSLO139-12 KX039118 MNH, SISVN
MiturgidaeCheiracanthiumpunctorium00786519SPSLO140-12 KX039120 MNH, SISVN
MiturgidaeCheiracanthiumpunctoriumARA0056SPSLO337-13 KX039119 EZ LABSVN
NemesiidaeNemesiapannonica00786333SPSLO311-13 KX039280 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromusalbidus00786272SPSLO312-13 KX039332 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromusaureolus00786539SPSLO069-12 KX039333 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromuscespitum00786513SPSLO070-12 KX039335 MNH, SICHE
PhilodromidaePhilodromuscespitumARA0400SPSLO446-13 KX039334 EZ LABSVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromusdispar00786492SPSLO142-12 KX039336 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromuspraedatus00786500SPSLO071-12 KX039338 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromuspraedatusARA0404SPSLO450-13 KX039337 NMBECHE
PhilodromidaePhilodromuspulchellus00786475SPSLO072-12 KX039339 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromuspulchellusARA0344SPSLO395-13 KX039340 EZ LABSVN
PhilodromidaePhilodromusvagulus00786366SPSLO257-12MNH, SICHE
PhilodromidaePhilodromusvagulusARA0351SPSLO401-13NMBECHE
PhilodromidaeThanatusformicinus00786530SPSLO073-12 KX039403 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaeTibellusmacellus00786493SPSLO074-12 KX039412 MNH, SISVN
PhilodromidaeTibellusmacellusARA0334SPSLO387-13 KX039411 EZ LABSVN
PholcidaePsilochorussimoni00786501SPSLO076-12 KX039359 MNH, SISVN
PisauridaePisauramirabilis00786487SPSLO144-12 KX039349 MNH, SISVN
PisauridaePisauramirabilisARA0383SPSLO431-13 KX039350 NMBECHE
SalticidaeEvarchaarcuata00786332SPSLO259-12 KX039177 MNH, SICHE
SalticidaeEvarchaarcuataARA0062SPSLO338-13 KX039178 EZ LABSVN
SalticidaeEvarchafalcata00786408SPSLO145-12MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeEvarchafalcataARA0037SPSLO331-13 KX039179 EZ LABSVN
SalticidaeEvarchajucunda00786503SPSLO077-12 KX039180 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeEvarchamichailovi00786313SPSLO313-13MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeEvarchamichailovi00786458SPSLO260-12MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeEvarchamichailoviARA0436SPSLO476-13EZ LABSVN
SalticidaeHasariusadansoni00786348SPSLO261-12 KX039197 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeHeliophanusaeneus00786293SPSLO314-13MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeHeliophanusauratus00786282SPSLO315-13 KX039198 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeHeliophanuscupreus00786518SPSLO146-12 KX039199 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeHeliophanuscupreusARA0382SPSLO430-13 KX039200 NMBECHE
SalticidaeHeliophanusflavipes00786510SPSLO147-12 KX039202 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeHeliophanusflavipesARA0396SPSLO442-13 KX039201 EZ LABSVN
SalticidaeHeliophanuskochii00786495SPSLO078-12 KX039203 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeIciussubinermis00786381SPSLO148-12 KX039217 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeLeptorchestesberolinensis00786512SPSLO079-12 KX039227 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeMacaroerisnidicolens00786338SPSLO262-12 KX039236 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeMarpissamuscosa00786523SPSLO080-12 KX039245 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeMarpissanivoyi00786496SPSLO081-12 KX039246 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeMyrmarachneformicaria00786432SPSLO149-12 KX039277 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeNeonreticulatus00786370SPSLO150-12 KX039281 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaePellenesseriatus00786462SPSLO263-12 KX039329 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaePellenesseriatus00786504SPSLO082-12 KX039327 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaePellenesseriatusARA0439SPSLO479-13 KX039328 EZ LABSVN
SalticidaePhilaeuschrysops00786472SPSLO264-12 KX039331 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaePseudeuophryslanigera00786280SPSLO316-13 KX039358 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeSaitisbarbipes00786507SPSLO083-12 KX039363 MNH, SISVN
SalticidaeSalticusscenicus00786362SPSLO265-12 KX039364 MNH, SICHE
SalticidaeSibianoraurocinctus00786377SPSLO266-12MNH, SICHE
SalticidaeSibianoraurocinctusARA0385SPSLO433-13NMBECHE
SalticidaeSitticusrupicola00786525SPSLO084-12 KX039377 MNH, SICHE
SalticidaeSitticusrupicolaARA0378SPSLO426-13 KX039378 NMBECHE
ScytodidaeScytodesthoracica00786521SPSLO085-12 KX039371 MNH, SISVN
SegestriidaeSegestriasenoculata00786281SPSLO317-13 KX039372 MNH, SISVN
SparassidaeMicrommatavirescens00786497SPSLO086-12MNH, SISVN
SparassidaeMicrommatavirescensARA0365SPSLO414-13 KX039266 NMBECHE
TetragnathidaeMetellinamengei00786536SPSLO087-12 KX039251 MNH, SICHE
TetragnathidaeMetellinamengeiARA0373SPSLO422-13 KX039252 NMBECHE
TetragnathidaeMetellinamerianae00786298SPSLO318-13 KX039253 MNH, SICHE
TetragnathidaeMetellinamerianaeARA0394SPSLO441-13 KX039254 EZ LABSVN
TetragnathidaeMetellinasegmentata00786357SPSLO152-12 KX039255 MNH, SISVN
TetragnathidaeMetellinasegmentataARA0431SPSLO472-13 KX039256 EZ LABSVN
TetragnathidaePachygnathadegeeri00786399SPSLO153-12 KX039300 MNH, SISVN
TetragnathidaeTetragnathanigrita00786534SPSLO088-12 KX039400 MNH, SISVN
TetragnathidaeTetragnathanigritaARA0041SPSLO332-13 KX039401 EZ LABSVN
TetragnathidaeTetragnathapinicola00786361SPSLO267-12 KX039402 MNH, SICHE
TetragnathidaeTetragnathapinicola00786520SPSLO155-12MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeAsagenaphalerata00786346SPSLO156-12 KX039095 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeCrustulinaguttata00786454SPSLO268-12 KX039132 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeCrustulinaguttataARA0437SPSLO477-13 KX039131 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeCrustulinascabripes00786479SPSLO089-12 KX039134 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeCrustulinascabripesARA0137SPSLO352-13 KX039133 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeDipoenamelanogaster00786506SPSLO090-12 KX039147 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeEnoplognathaafrodite00786532SPSLO157-12 KX039160 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeEnoplognathaafroditeARA0135SPSLO350-13 KX039159 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeEnoplognathalatimana00786329SPSLO269-12 KX039161 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeEnoplognathaovata00786515SPSLO158-12 KX039163 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeEnoplognathaovataARA0367SPSLO416-13 KX039162 NMBECHE
TheridiidaeEpisinusangulatus00786386SPSLO159-12 KX039165 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeEpisinusmaculipes00786488SPSLO160-12 KX039166 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeEpisinustruncatus00786327SPSLO270-12 KX039168 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeEpisinustruncatusARA0132SPSLO349-13 KX039167 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeEuryopisflavomaculata00786468SPSLO271-12 KX039176 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeHeterotheridionnigrovariegatum00786482SPSLO161-12 KX039206 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeHeterotheridionnigrovariegatumARA0343SPSLO394-13 KX039205 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeNeottiurabimaculata00786445SPSLO163-12 KX039284 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeNeottiurabimaculataARA0366SPSLO415-13 KX039283 NMBECHE
TheridiidaeNeottiuraherbigrada00786467SPSLO272-12 KX039285 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeNeottiurasuaveolens00786427SPSLO164-12 KX039286 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaePaidiscurapallens00786288SPSLO319-13 KX039301 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeParasteatodalunata00786476SPSLO165-12 KX039304 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeParasteatodatepidariorum00786531SPSLO091-12 KX039305 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeParasteatodatepidariorumARA0329SPSLO384-13 KX039306 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaePhyllonetaimpressa00786401SPSLO273-12 KX039342 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaePhyllonetaimpressaARA0428SPSLO469-13 KX039343 NMBECHE
TheridiidaePhyllonetasisyphia00786364SPSLO274-12 KX039344 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaePhyllonetasisyphiaARA0416SPSLO460-13 KX039345 NMBECHE
TheridiidaePlatnickinatincta00786380SPSLO167-12 KX039353 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeRobertuslividusARA0201SPSLO363-13 KX039360 NMBECHE
TheridiidaeRobertusmediterraneus00786334SPSLO275-12MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeRobertusmediterraneus00786433SPSLO168-12MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeRobertusscoticus00786290SPSLO320-13MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeRobertustruncorum00786435SPSLO169-12 KX039361 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeRobertustruncorumARA0280SPSLO381-13 KX039362 NMBECHE
TheridiidaeSardinidionblackwalli00786271SPSLO321-13 KX039365 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeSimitidionsimile00786549SPSLO170-12 KX039375 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeSimitidionsimileARA0442SPSLO481-13 KX039374 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeSteatodabipunctata00786325SPSLO276-12 KX039380 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeSteatodabipunctataARA0029SPSLO328-13 KX039379 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeSteatodatriangulosa00786489SPSLO171-12 KX039382 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeSteatodatriangulosaARA0046SPSLO334-13 KX039381 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeTheridionbetteni00786340SPSLO277-12 KX039404 MNH, SICHE
TheridiidaeTheridionpinastri00786480SPSLO172-12 KX039406 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeTheridionpinastriARA0136SPSLO351-13 KX039405 EZ LABSVN
TheridiidaeTheridionvarians00786374SPSLO173-12 KX039408 MNH, SISVN
TheridiidaeTheridionvariansARA0043SPSLO333-13 KX039407 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeDiaealivens00786359SPSLO174-12 KX039138 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeEbrechtellatricuspidata00786508SPSLO092-12 KX039157 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeEbrechtellatricuspidataARA0033SPSLO330-13 KX039158 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeHeriaeushirtus00786469SPSLO278-12 KX039204 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeMisumenavatia00786387SPSLO175-12 KX039270 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeMisumenavatiaARA0081SPSLO342-13 KX039271 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeOzyptilaatomaria00786522SPSLO176-12 KX039298 MNH, SICHE
ThomisidaeOzyptilanigrita00786499SPSLO093-12 KX039299 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeSynemaglobosum00786485SPSLO177-12 KX039384 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeSynemaglobosumARA0390SPSLO438-13 KX039385 NMBECHE
ThomisidaeThomisusonustus00786455SPSLO280-12 KX039410 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeThomisusonustusARA0426SPSLO467-13 KX039409 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeTmaruspiger00786484SPSLO178-12 KX039417 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeTmaruspigerARA0376SPSLO425-13 KX039418 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeXysticusacerbus00786483SPSLO179-12 KX039425 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticusaudax00786347SPSLO180-12 KX039427 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticusaudaxARA0402SPSLO448-13 KX039426 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeXysticusbifasciatus00786543SPSLO181-12 KX039428 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuscristatus00786537SPSLO182-12 KX039430 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuscristatusARA0389SPSLO437-13 KX039429 NMBECHE
ThomisidaeXysticusdesidiosus00786372SPSLO183-12MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuserraticus00786275SPSLO322-13 KX039431 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuskempeleni00786486SPSLO184-12 KX039432 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuskochi00786303SPSLO323-13 KX039433 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuskochiARA0434SPSLO474-13 KX039434 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeXysticuslanio00786477SPSLO185-12 KX039435 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuslineatus00786535SPSLO186-12 KX039437 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticuslineatusARA0304SPSLO383-13 KX039436 EZ LABSVN
ThomisidaeXysticusmacedonicus00786376SPSLO281-12 KX039438 MNH, SICHE
ThomisidaeXysticustenebrosus00786478SPSLO187-12 KX039440 MNH, SISVN
ThomisidaeXysticustenebrosusARA0332SPSLO385-13 KX039439 EZ LABSVN
TitanoecidaeTitanoecatristis00786297SPSLO324-13 KX039416 MNH, SISVN
UloboridaeHyptiotesparadoxus00786546SPSLO188-12 KX039216 MNH, SISVN
UloboridaeHyptiotesparadoxusARA0241SPSLO370-13 KX039215 EZ LABSVN
UloboridaeUloboruswalckenaerius00786324SPSLO282-12 KX039420 MNH, SISVN
ZoridaeZoraspinimana00786494SPSLO094-12 KX039449 MNH, SISVN
ZoridaeZoraspinimanaARA0192SPSLO361-13 KX039448 NMBECHE

Notes.

National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution

Evolutionary Zoology Lab

Naturhistorisches Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern

Slovenia

Switzerland

Malaysia

Tissues

After specimen identification and processing, up to four legs (or in the case of very small individuals the whole prosoma) of a spider were removed and stored in fresh absolute ethanol in cryovials. Part of the tissue was used for DNA isolation while the other part remains permanently frozen at −80 °C at GGI facilities. The maintenance and use of these materials abides by the international legal standards and conventions of the biological genetic heritage (The Access and Benefit Sharing agreement as part of the 2010 Nagoya protocol). Notes. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Evolutionary Zoology Lab Naturhistorisches Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern Slovenia Switzerland Malaysia

Molecular procedures

At Laboratories of Analytical Biology (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, hereafter LAB), specimens were extracted using the AutoGenPrep phenol-chloroform automated extractor (AutoGen). Samples were digested overnight in buffer containing proteinase-k before extraction. At EZ Lab, specimens were extracted using the Mag MAX™ Express magnetic particle processor Type 700 with DNA Multisample kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols with modifications (Vidergar, Toplak & Kuntner, 2014). At EZ Lab PCR was carried out using mainly primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al., 1994). Standard reaction volume was 35 µL containing 2.3 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 0.15 mM each dNTP (Biotools), 0.4 µM of each primer, 0.2 µL 10 mg/mL BSA (Promega), 0.2 µL GoTaqFlexi polymerase (Promega) and 2 µL DNA. PCR cycling conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of 40 s at 94°C, 1 min at 48 °–52 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, with final extension at 72 °C for 3 min. Additional primers were used for PCR for a few problematic specimens: dgLCO1490 and dgHCO2198 (Meyer & Paulay, 2005) and the reverse primer Chelicerate-R2 (Barrett & Hebert, 2005). Cycling parameters for difficult specimens were: 20 cycles of usual cycling protocol (above) followed by 15 cycles of 1.5 min at 94 °C, 1.5 min at 52 °C and 2 min at 72 °Cm version 5.6.6 (Kearse et al., 2012). EZ Lab PCR products were sent to be Sanger sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Amsterdam, Netherlands), and the sequences were aligned, checked for sequencing errors and trimmed to match the barcode region in Geneious Pro version 5.6.6 (Kearse et al., 2012). At LAB, PCR was carried out using the primer pair LCO1490 (Folmer et al., 1994) and Chelicerate-R2 (Barrett & Hebert, 2005). A 10 µL reaction mix contained 2.5 mM MgCl2 0.3 µM of each primer, 0.5 mM dNTPs, and 5 units of Biolase DNA polymerase (Bioline). PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 48 °C, 45 s at 72 °C. PCR products were cleaned with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix), Sanger sequenced using Big Dyes (Life Technologies) and run on a 3730xl DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were examined for quality and trimmed to the standard barcode segment (649 bp) using Sequencher 5.01 (Gene Codes).

Barcode library

While we targeted 649 bp long DNA barcodes we also submitted (Table 1) 18 shorter fragments (>570 bp) that still satisfy the requirements of The Barcode of Life Data System BOLD systems (Ratnasingham & Hebert, 2007). We combined the 297 species barcodes from this study with publically available Araneae sequences from BOLD retrieved 4 December 2013, for a total of 816 species sequences, which formed the test library for this study. Sequences from BOLD were initially included if the sequence length was at least 600 bases and identification was to species. We further filtered and curated the data to exclude sequences whose identification was anonymous or by non-arachnologists, diverged dramatically from all other spider sequences, or for other reasons the sequences were not deemed to be reliable. After having discarded the above, we did not assess the accuracy of every remaining sequence, as it is well known that both BOLD and GenBank contain errors of various kinds, and we wanted our test library to reflect real world conditions. A single sequence was chosen per species from BOLD using these criteria and added to the original sequences from this project, resulting in 816 species representing 313 genera and 49 families (Table 1 and Table S2). Eighteen sequences were singletons at the family level; the maximum number of species per family was 224. 157 sequences were singletons at the genus level; the maximum number of species per genus was 34. The standalone BLAST+ suite 2.2.28 (Altschul et al., 1990; Zhang et al., 2000) was used to create a custom BLAST database from these sequences. Each sequence was then queried against the full set using blastn (MegaBLAST task, minimum e value of 1e–10, maximum of top ten hits other than the hit of the query to itself). For each hit the percent of identical nucleotides in the aligned region (PIdent) was calculated by BLAST. An advantage of using BLAST is the local nature of the alignment hits returned. This will account for differences in sequence lengths in the dataset, which may otherwise affect pairwise identity calculations of complete alignments. A possible outcome of BLAST results are short aligned regions that have high similarity but omit much of the queried sequence. To investigate this, we compared lengths of aligned regions with query sequence lengths to determine the prevalence of this in this dataset. Custom Python scripts (GitHub https://github.com/mkweskin/spider-blast) were used to parse the results, removing the match of the query to itself and to score whether hits matched the genus and family of the query sequence or not. Obviously, if the generic identification matched, the family identification also matched; families therefore always match more often than genera. On the other hand, singleton generic sequences cannot match correctly at the genus level (for spiders or other poorly known diverse groups), and, likewise, singleton family sequences cannot match correctly at the family level (for spiders or other poorly known diverse groups). We included singletons as targets in order to model more realistically BLAST searches against the BOLD database (many sequences in BOLD are higher level singletons), and also to test more strongly the ability of sequences with two or more species per either genus or family to match correctly. Including 18 singleton family sequences and 157 singleton genus sequences, therefore, increases the probability of misidentification at either ranks and more strongly tests the usefulness of barcodes as supraspecific identification tools. However, because the 18 unique family sequences must fail at both the family and genus levels, and the 157 unique genus level sequences must fail at the genus level, these necessary failures were not included in the overall assessments of the ability of barcode sequences to provide accurate identifications at supraspecific levels.

Results

The 816 query sequences returned 8,159 total hits with one query only returning nine hits and all others ten (Table S1). PIdent scores ranged from 75% to 100%. We also examined the length of the sequence matched compared to the entire sequence length. 8,114 hits (>99%) matched to 90% or more of the query sequence length indicating that these results represent matches to large portions of the query validating the use of Percent Sequence Identity in the BLAST hits rather than computing the value for a global alignment between sequences. Figure 2 shows the frequency distributions of PIdent values of correct and incorrect identifications at the genus and family rank.
Figure 2

Results from the barcode matching test.

Frequency distributions of correct and incorrect identifications by percent sequence identity (PIdent) for the top ten and/or best hits at the genus and family level. Shaded areas include hits where no more than 5% of identifications were incorrect.

Results from the barcode matching test.

Frequency distributions of correct and incorrect identifications by percent sequence identity (PIdent) for the top ten and/or best hits at the genus and family level. Shaded areas include hits where no more than 5% of identifications were incorrect. 95% of incorrect genus identifications were below PIdent = 95 when all hits for all queries are included, which suggests the latter value as a heuristic threshold to delimit incorrect from correct identifications (for these data). For only the highest rank hits whose PIdent ≥95, 98% of genus identifications were correct. 95% of incorrect family identifications were below PIdent = 91 when all hits for all queries are included, which suggests the latter value as a heuristic threshold to delimit incorrect from correct identifications (for these data). For only the highest rank hits whose PIdent ≥91, 97% of family identifications were correct. Library accuracy is crucial, but sequencing, labelling, and identification errors are difficult to detect a priori. The highest ranked incorrect family identification was Meta menardi (Tetragnathidae) to Steatoda grossa (Theridiidae), at PIdent = 96. Further study of the M. menardi sequence shows that the BOLD record is probably a mislabeled Steatoda. The first true incorrect family identification occurs at a PIdent value of 88; the best hit for Octonoba (Uloboridae) is Amaurobius (Amaurobiidae). For the 136 genera with at least two species in the library, 76% (n = 103) best matched congeners. Thirty-three failed, perhaps because sequences were incorrectly identified taxonomically, or the sequence itself may be erroneous, or perhaps due to non-monophyly of genera. The distributions of PIdents for correct family and genus identifications differ significantly from the distributions of incorrect identifications (Fig. 2). Plotted against increasing numbers of species/genus, and genera/family, the proportion of top ten PIdent values that exceed the above suggested threshold values increases. Roughly speaking, 15 species per genus, and 5 genera per family, are sufficient to ensure that best hits represent correct identifications (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Importance of library representation.

Relation between proportion of best sequence identity and numbers of species per genus (A), and genera per family (B). Heuristic thresholds to delimit incorrect from correct identifications were 95 and 91 for genus and family, respectively.

Importance of library representation.

Relation between proportion of best sequence identity and numbers of species per genus (A), and genera per family (B). Heuristic thresholds to delimit incorrect from correct identifications were 95 and 91 for genus and family, respectively.

Discussion

We show that standard DNA barcodes can accurately assign unknown specimens to genus and family given sufficient sequence identity and sufficient taxonomic representation in the database. Accurate identification (PIdent above which less than 5% of identifications were incorrect) occurred for genera at PIdent values > 95 and families at PIdent values ≥91, suggesting these as heuristic thresholds for generic and familial identifications in spiders (shaded in Fig. 2). Accuracy of identification increases with numbers of species/genus and genera/family; above five genera per family and 15 species per genus all identifications were correct (Fig. 3). The accurate identification of specimens remains a critical challenge for megadiverse groups such as arthropods, most other invertebrates, plants, fungi, protists etc. Morphological identification to species, or even more inclusive taxonomic ranks like genera and families, in many cases requires extensive training, and for most groups taxonomic expertise is limited and dwindling—the so called ‘taxonomic impediment’ (Rodman & Cody, 2003; Agnarsson & Kuntner, 2007). DNA barcodes have been proposed as convenient tools to overcome this impediment by making identification a purely technical procedure available to any interested researcher or even ‘citizen scientists.’ However, the accuracy of such a tool strongly depends on the scope and quality of the barcode library (Smit, Reijnen & Stokvis, 2013). Currently available data on databanks like BOLD and GenBank are extensive for some groups, yet the vast majority of species on earth have not yet been barcoded, much less discovered and described taxonomically—each of these tasks is enormous. Even for existing barcoding data, numerous sequences lack accurate taxonomic identification (Collins & Cruickshank, 2013), limiting their utility (e.g., only 58% of Araneae in BOLD are identified to species, and of those many are not correctly identified, as shown in our results; see also Shen, Chen & Murphy, 2013; Blagoev et al., 2016). Therefore, the identification of unknown specimens through blasting against BOLD or GenBank will be inaccurate if the databases lack close hits or contain errors. While the ideal database would allow species-level identification by containing barcodes from expertly identified and vouchered specimens of all species, we hypothesized that rapid surveys of well-known biotas can help quickly to build valuable tools allowing identification of larger clades such as genera and families. Although we were careful to screen available barcode sequences from BOLD to produce a test library with as few errors as possible, it is certainly possible that errors remained, either due to mistakes in the lab or taxonomic identifications of vouchers. For example, Meta menardi (Tetragnathidae) blasted to Steatoda grossa (Theridiidae) at PIdent = 96, and BLAST searches on GenBank suggest this Meta sequence is actually a Steatoda. Likewise, the linyphiids Agyneta orites and Incestophantes frigidus sequences were identical; one of these records is probably wrong. These sorts of errors bias identifications and limit utility of barcodes. Other examples of identical barcode sequences were all congeners, and therefore are less likely to involve errors but could indicate faults in taxonomy: Arctosa maculata and A. fulvolineata, Bolyphantes luteolus and B. alticeps, Pardosa alacris and P. trifrons, and Pityohyphantes tacoma and P. cristatus. Likewise, the genus Neriene (Linyphiidae) seems non-monophyletic and identifications were thus not accurate.

Conclusions

These results suggest that accurate assignment of unknown taxa to genus and family is feasible through DNA barcoding. Database quality is crucial. Numbers of potential matches at generic and familial ranks also affect the probability that an unknown sequence will blast best to the correct family or genus. Unlike the inventory of species, biological discovery of family-level clades of life also seems far advanced—few eukaryotic families, apparently, remain to be discovered. Taken together, these results suggest that barcode-targeted sequencing of exemplars from all families of life (and most genera, if possible) should be an important scientific priority. It would enable approximate taxonomic identification of any organism anywhere on Earth by rapid, cheap, purely technical procedures requiring no specialist knowledge—certainly an important milestone in the on-going attempt to discover, classify, and understand the Earth’s biota. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Original sequences this project submitted to BOLD and GenBank (only those on GenBank are also publically available on BOLD, for all others, see http://ezlab.zrc-sazu.si/dna/). Legend: MNH, SI = National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution; EZ LAB = Evolutionary Zoology Lab, ZRC SAZU; NMBE = Naturhistorisches Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern; SVN = Slovenia; CHE = Switzerland; MYS = Malaysia. Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The taxonomic impediment overcome: NSF's Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET) as a model.

Authors:  James E Rodman; Jeannine H Cody
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 3.  Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Matjaz Kuntner
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Inferring evolutionarily significant units of bacterial diversity from broad environmental surveys of single-locus data.

Authors:  Timothy G Barraclough; Martin Hughes; Natalie Ashford-Hodges; Tomochika Fujisawa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales.

Authors:  Klemen Čandek; Matjaž Kuntner
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

7.  Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Half of the European fruit fly species barcoded (Diptera, Tephritidae); a feasibility test for molecular identification.

Authors:  John Smit; Bastian Reijnen; Frank Stokvis
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Barcoding beetles: a regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences.

Authors:  Mikko Pentinsaari; Paul D N Hebert; Marko Mutanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region.

Authors:  W John Kress; David L Erickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  DNA Barcodes Combined with Multilocus Data of Representative Taxa Can Generate Reliable Higher-Level Phylogenies.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Vladimir Lukhtanov; Naomi E Pierce; Roger Vila
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  From water striders to water bugs: the molecular diversity of aquatic Heteroptera (Gerromorpha, Nepomorpha) of Germany based on DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Nadine Havemann; Martin M Gossner; Lars Hendrich; Jèrôme Morinière; Rolf Niedringhaus; Peter Schäfer; Michael J Raupach
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Identification of Indian Spiders through DNA barcoding: Cryptic species and species complex.

Authors:  Kaomud Tyagi; Vikas Kumar; Shantanu Kundu; Avas Pakrashi; Priya Prasad; John T D Caleb; Kailash Chandra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A reference library for Canadian invertebrates with 1.5 million barcodes, voucher specimens, and DNA samples.

Authors:  Jeremy R deWaard; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Evgeny V Zakharov; Alex V Borisenko; Dirk Steinke; Angela C Telfer; Kate H J Perez; Jayme E Sones; Monica R Young; Valerie Levesque-Beaudin; Crystal N Sobel; Arusyak Abrahamyan; Kyrylo Bessonov; Gergin Blagoev; Stephanie L deWaard; Chris Ho; Natalia V Ivanova; Kara K S Layton; Liuqiong Lu; Ramya Manjunath; Jaclyn T A McKeown; Megan A Milton; Renee Miskie; Norm Monkhouse; Suresh Naik; Nadya Nikolova; Mikko Pentinsaari; Sean W J Prosser; Adriana E Radulovici; Claudia Steinke; Connor P Warne; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Towards a synthesis of the Caribbean biogeography of terrestrial arthropods.

Authors:  Sarah C Crews; Lauren A Esposito
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Towards a DNA Barcode Reference Database for Spiders and Harvestmen of Germany.

Authors:  Jonas J Astrin; Hubert Höfer; Jörg Spelda; Joachim Holstein; Steffen Bayer; Lars Hendrich; Bernhard A Huber; Karl-Hinrich Kielhorn; Hans-Joachim Krammer; Martin Lemke; Juan Carlos Monje; Jérôme Morinière; Björn Rulik; Malte Petersen; Hannah Janssen; Christoph Muster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  DNA-barcoding of forensically important blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the Caribbean Region.

Authors:  Sohath Z Yusseff-Vanegas; Ingi Agnarsson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Genetic hitchhiking, mitonuclear coadaptation, and the origins of mt DNA barcode gaps.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  DNA barcodes enable higher taxonomic assignments in the Acari.

Authors:  Monica R Young; Jeremy R deWaard; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Incongruent molecular and morphological variation in the crab spider Synemaglobosum (Araneae, Thomisidae) in Europe.

Authors:  Karin Urfer; Tamara Spasojevic; Seraina Klopfstein; Hannes Baur; Liana Lasut; Christian Kropf
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 1.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.