Literature DB >> 27547457

Oligometastatic prostate cancer: Metastases-directed therapy?

Hein Van Poppel1, Gert De Meerleer1, Steven Joniau1.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of anatomical and functional imaging with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and choline or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography, we are able to diagnose a previously unknown disease, the oligometastatic prostate cancer after local therapy. Reports on surgical and radiation treatment for low-volume metastatic recurrence have shown promising results, with definitive cure in few but a relevant delay of androgen-deprivation therapy with both treatment methods. Obviously, these results need to be validated with prospective randomised data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (SB)RT, (stereotactic body) radiotherapy; ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; BRFS, biochemical recurrence-free survival; CPFS, clinical progression-free survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival; LND, lymph node dissection; Lymph node dissection; Oligometastatic prostate cancer; PET, positron emission tomography; Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27547457      PMCID: PMC4983156          DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arab J Urol        ISSN: 2090-598X


Introduction

Metastatic prostate cancer is classically treated with hormonal manipulation. Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a relatively new concept. It was originally defined as five or less metastatic sites [1]. It was proposed as a clinically significant state separate from the polymetastatic disease [2] and considered to be less aggressive than other metastatic phenotypes [3]. Importantly, oligometastatic prostate cancer was shown to have a different microRNA profile than polymetastatic disease [4]. Obviously, patients with oligometastatic disease are prone to progress at the initial metastatic foci. The rationale of metastasis-directed treatment comes from the concept that it might delay or avoid the castrate-resistant prostate cancer status by eradicating castration-resistant clones. Indeed, metastasis-directed treatment might postpone the initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and hypothetically may lead to improved survival [5].

Modern anatomical and functional imaging

For metastatic prostate cancer the conventional imaging is CT and bone-scan. It is well documented that these conventional imaging tools have a low sensitivity and limited accuracy. In recent years, new tools have been introduced where anatomical and functional imaging is combined. Multiparametric MRI can indeed provide functional imaging by the use of diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and MR spectroscopy imaging, whilst, the use of new tracers in nuclear medicine has continued to improve accuracy, after the use of fluorodeoxyglucose in metastatic prostate cancer was shown to be futile. 11C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was shown to be much more reliable in cases of fast PSA rise [6] or when a PSA-doubling time of <6 months was seen [7]. The problem with 11C-choline is its’ very short half-life, and therefore it needs to be produced on the spot. 18F-choline has also been used, which has a longer half-life, thereby overcoming the problem of on spot fabrication but it has higher urinary excretion that can lead to misinterpretation at the level of the urinary tract. It is because of the introduction of these new imaging techniques that we have become able to diagnose a previously unknown disease, the oligometastatic disease. Typically prostate cancer metastasises to the bone and these bone metastases are amenable to targeted radiotherapy (RT). Likewise, metastasis to the lymph nodes could be treated with stereotactic body RT (SBRT) or could be amenable to surgical excision. This way, oligometastatic disease can be managed with a metastasis-directed therapy rather than with the conventional ADT.

Surgical and radiation treatment for low-volume metastatic recurrence

In 2011, Rigatti et al. [8] reported on a single-centre experience of salvage lymph node dissection (LND) for nodal recurrence. At 1 year after salvage LND, 55.2% of the patients had biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), at 3 years 27.5%, and at 5 years 10.3%. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) at 1 year was 98.4%, at 3 years 90.5%, and at 5 years 75%. Also salvage external beam RT was used in hormone-naïve oligometastatic prostate cancer as reported by Berkovic et al. [9]. They described 24 patients with up to three bone metastases or lymph nodes. RT was given with the dose up to 50 Gy in 10 fractions and the primary endpoint was the ADT-free survival. ADT was initiated when more than three metastases occurred during follow-up or when the PSA level rose to >50 ng/mL. The median follow-up in their series was 24 months and they showed that ADT was delayed with a median of 38 months (Table 1) [8], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].
Table 1

Studies on surgical and radiation treatment for low-volume metastatic recurrence.

StudyNMean follow-up, monthsADT before salvage LND, %ADT after salvage LND, %Complete response, %5-year BRFS, %5-year CPFS, %5-year CSS, %
Rinnab et al., 2008 [12]1513.73373NANANANA
Rigatti et al., 2011 [8]7239.4566557193475
Jilg et al., 2012 [13]4735.579654692678
Suardi et al., 2013 [14]16240NANA41404786
Suardu et al., 2014 [15]5981.1631-year: 445-year: 6359295289
Osmonov et al., 2014 [16]22NANA4164NANANA

Literature review on metastasis-directed therapy

A systematic review of the literature on metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer was published in European Urology by Ost et al., 2014 [10]. They looked at the results of metastasis-directed therapy in 450 patients. In all, 299 patients underwent salvage RT: 93 had bone metastasis, 202 had nodal metastasis (of which 128 had pelvic RT and 74 RT to the lymph nodes only), and four had visceral metastasis. In all, 70% of these RT-treated patients had concomitant hormonal treatment. Also, 151 patients had a salvage LND: 78 underwent pelvic LND, 13 retro-peritoneal and 65 pelvic and retro-peritoneal LND. In the surgical series, 58% had hormone treatment and 29% also had RT. Overall, 97% had a primary LND (with 9–11 nodes removed). Between 2.5 and 26 nodes were removed at salvage LND and positive nodes were found in 19% in the internal iliac and obturator fossa, in 15% in the external iliac, in 21% in the common iliac, and in 46% at the level of the bifurcation or higher. Another literature review was done by De Meerleer and Van Poppel in Mirrors of Medicine 2014 [11]. They looked at the results reported by Rinnab et al., 2008 [12]; Rigatti et al., 2011 [8]; Jilg et al., 2012 [13]; Suardi et al., 2013 [14] and 2014 [15]; and by Osmonov et al., 2014 [16]. The longest follow-up was reported in the 59 patients in the Suardi et al., 2014 study [16], with a mean follow-up of 81.1 months. In all, 63% of the patients had ADT before the salvage LND. Moreover, 44% had ADT for 1 year after the LND and 63% had ADT for 5 years after the salvage LND. A complete response was obtained in 59%. The 5-year BRFS was 29%, the 5-year clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) was 52%, and the 5-year CSS was 89%. A collaborative review published in European Urology in 2014 by Abdollah et al. [17] investigated the contemporary role of salvage LND in patients with recurrence after radical prostatectomy. They concluded that the correct patient selection for salvage LND would ideally be the one with a PSA level of <4 ng/mL, a Gleason score of <8, and nodal involvement limited to the pelvic nodes. Actually, whether a template dissection or a resection of PET positive nodes only needs to be done is not clear yet. The authors also reported complications such as prolonged lymphorrhoea, lymphoceles, and lymphoedema. After the salvage LND, a complete PSA response, two or less positive lymph nodes at pathology, and positive lymph nodes limited to the pelvis only, were identified as favourable prognostic factors [13], [14], [15]. The literature on SBRT is also summarised (Table 2) [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. In all, seven studies were analysed encompassing 221 patients; 110 patients had nodal, 118 bone and three had visceral metastasis, and the median follow-up was 22 months. Local control was achieved in >90%, CPFS varied between 37% and 71%, and grade 3 toxicity was noted in 0.5% of the patients only.
Table 2

Studies on SBRT metastasis-directed therapy.

ReferenceNumber of patientsSite of metastasis node/bone/visceralMedian follow-up, months
Casamassima et al., 2011 [18]2525/0/029
Muacevic et al., 2011 [19]400/40/014
Ahmed et al., 2012 [20]171/19/16
Tabata et al., 2012 [21]180/18/0NR
Jereczek-Fossa et al., 2012 [22]1918/1/017
Decaestecker et al., 2014 [23]5230/20/227
Schick et al., 2013 [24]5033/17/031



Total221110/118/322

Conclusion

Salvage LND

For most patients with oligometastatic involvement of the pelvic nodes, a salvage LND will allow postponement of ADT and has limited toxicity. About 50% will achieve a complete PSA response and about one-third will remain free of PSA relapse for 5 years. However, these data need to be validated in prospective randomised trials, whilst the impact on the results of concomitant ADT needs to be analysed further.

Salvage RT

Salvage RT to bone or lymph nodes allows postponement of ADT and is also not very toxic. However, salvage RT will not achieve undetectable PSA levels unless associated with ADT. It is not known yet how many patients will be free of PSA at 5 years. The only data available today are on CPFS at 3 years, which also need to be validated with prospective randomised data. In conclusion, metastasis-directed therapy is promising but needs validation in a randomised controlled trial. For the time being, all we can do is optimise selection and individualise the treatment strategies.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Source of funding

None.
  23 in total

1.  Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.

Authors:  Nazareno Suardi; Marco Moschini; Andrea Gallina; Giorgio Gandaglia; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Marco Bianchi; Manuela Tutolo; Niccolò Passoni; Andrea Salonia; Petter Hedlund; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Extracranial oligometastases: a subset of metastases curable with stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kimberly S Corbin; Samuel Hellman; Ralph R Weichselbaum
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Androgen deprivation and high-dose radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer patients with less than five regional and/or distant metastases.

Authors:  Ulrike Schick; Sandra Jorcano; Philippe Nouet; Michel Rouzaud; Hansjoerg Vees; Thomas Zilli; Osman Ratib; Damien C Weber; Raymond Miralbell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with limited prostate cancer metastases: deferring androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Berkovic; Gert De Meerleer; Louke Delrue; Bieke Lambert; Valérie Fonteyne; Nicolaas Lumen; Karel Decaestecker; Geert Villeirs; Philippe Vuye; Piet Ost
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Predicting survival of patients with node-positive prostate cancer following multimodal treatment.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; R Jeffrey Karnes; Nazareno Suardi; Cesare Cozzarini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Marco Bianchi; Stephen A Boorjian; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Piet Ost; Alberto Bossi; Karel Decaestecker; Gert De Meerleer; Gianluca Giannarini; R Jeffrey Karnes; Mack Roach; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Is there a favorable subset of patients with prostate cancer who develop oligometastases?

Authors:  Deepinder Singh; Won Sam Yi; Ralph A Brasacchio; Ann G Muhs; Therese Smudzin; Jacqueline P Williams; Edward Messing; Paul Okunieff
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Salvage lymph node dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C A Jilg; H C Rischke; S N Reske; K Henne; A-L Grosu; W Weber; V Drendel; M Schwardt; A Jandausch; W Schultze-Seemann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Efficacy of eradicative radiotherapy for limited nodal metastases detected with choline PET scan in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Franco Casamassima; Laura Masi; Claudia Menichelli; Ivano Bonucci; Emanuele Casamassima; Massimo Lazzeri; Massirno Gulisano; Stefano Aterini
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

10.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kamran A Ahmed; Brandon M Barney; Brian J Davis; Sean S Park; Eugene D Kwon; Kenneth R Olivier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of PSMA PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Radiation Treatment.

Authors:  Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Peter Choyke
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Evaluation of tumor recurrences after radical prostatectomy using 18F-Choline PET/CT and 3T multiparametric MRI without endorectal coil: a single center experience.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Manuel Recio; Antonio Maldonado; Elia Del Cerro; Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela; Israel J Thuissard; David Sanz-Rosa; Francisco José Marcos; Karmele Olaciregui; María Mateo; Laura Cerezo
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Artesunate suppresses the viability and mobility of prostate cancer cells through UCA1, the sponge of miR-184.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Xiuju Wang; Jianjun Zhang; Aina He; Ya Ling Wang; Kun Han; Yang Su; Junyi Yin; Xiaobin Lv; Haiyan Hu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.