Bill Lukin1, Li-Jun Fan2, Jing-Zhou Zhao3, Jian-Dong Sun4, Kaeleen Dingle2, Rhonda Purtill1, Sam Tapp1, Xiang-Yu Hou2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia. 2. School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia. 3. Bureau of Investment Promotion, Wuwei City 733000, Gansu Province, China. 4. Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospital emergency department (ED) use by patients from residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is not always appropriate, and this calls for interventions to avoid some unnecessary uses. This study aims to compare patterns of ED use by RACF patients with and without a Hospital in the Nursing Home (HiNH) program. METHODS: RACF patients presenting to EDs of a hospital with and a hospital without this program during pre- and post-intervention periods were included. Data on patient demographics and ED presentation characteristics were obtained from the Emergency Department Information System database, and were analysed by descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: In both hospitals, most RACF residents presenting to EDs were aged between 75-94 years, female, triaged at scale 3 to 5, and transferred on weekdays and during working hours. Almost half of them were subsequently admitted to hospitals. In accordance with the ICD-10-AM diagnostic coding system, diagnoses that consistently ranked among the top three reasons for visiting the two hospitals before and after intervention included Chapter XIX: injury and poisoning and Chapter X: respiratory diseases. Associated with the intervention, significant decreases in the numbers of presentations per 1 000 RACF beds were identified among patients diagnosed with Chapter XI: digestive diseases [rate ratio (95%CI): 0.09 (0.04, 0.22); P<0.0001] and Chapter XXI: factors influencing health status and contact with health services [rate ratio (95%CI): 0.22 (0.07, 0.66); P=0.007]. CONCLUSION: The HiNH program may reduce the incidence of RACF residents visiting EDs for diagnoses of Chapter XI and Chapter XXI.
BACKGROUND: Hospital emergency department (ED) use by patients from residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is not always appropriate, and this calls for interventions to avoid some unnecessary uses. This study aims to compare patterns of ED use by RACF patients with and without a Hospital in the Nursing Home (HiNH) program. METHODS: RACF patients presenting to EDs of a hospital with and a hospital without this program during pre- and post-intervention periods were included. Data on patient demographics and ED presentation characteristics were obtained from the Emergency Department Information System database, and were analysed by descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: In both hospitals, most RACF residents presenting to EDs were aged between 75-94 years, female, triaged at scale 3 to 5, and transferred on weekdays and during working hours. Almost half of them were subsequently admitted to hospitals. In accordance with the ICD-10-AM diagnostic coding system, diagnoses that consistently ranked among the top three reasons for visiting the two hospitals before and after intervention included Chapter XIX: injury and poisoning and Chapter X: respiratory diseases. Associated with the intervention, significant decreases in the numbers of presentations per 1 000 RACF beds were identified among patients diagnosed with Chapter XI: digestive diseases [rate ratio (95%CI): 0.09 (0.04, 0.22); P<0.0001] and Chapter XXI: factors influencing health status and contact with health services [rate ratio (95%CI): 0.22 (0.07, 0.66); P=0.007]. CONCLUSION: The HiNH program may reduce the incidence of RACF residents visiting EDs for diagnoses of Chapter XI and Chapter XXI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency department; Presenting complaint; Residential aged care
Authors: Andrea Gruneir; Chaim M Bell; Susan E Bronskill; Michael Schull; Geoffrey M Anderson; Paula A Rochon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.562