Lijun Fan1, William Lukin2, Jingzhou Zhao3, Jiandong Sun1, Xiang-Yu Hou1. 1. School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 3. Bureau of Investment Promotion, Wuwei, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High utilisation of emergency department (ED) among the elderly is of worldwide concern. This study aims to review the effectiveness of interventions targeting the elderly population in reducing ED utilisation. METHODS: Major biomedical databases were searched for relevant studies. Qualitative approach was applied to derive common themes in the myriad interventions and to critically assess the variations influencing interventions' effectiveness. Quality of studies was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPPHP) tool. RESULTS: 36 studies were included. Nine of 16 community-based interventions reported significant reductions in ED utilisation. Five of 20 hospital-based interventions proved effective while another four demonstrated failure. Seven key elements were identified. Ten of 14 interventions associated with significant reduction on ED use integrated at least three of the seven elements. All four interventions with significant negative results lacked five or more of the seven elements. Some key elements including multidisciplinary team, integrated primary care and social care often existed in effective interventions, while were absent in all significantly ineffective ones. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated interventions have mixed effectiveness. Our findings suggest the hospital-based interventions have relatively poorer effects, and should be better connected to the community-based strategies. Interventions seem to achieve the most success with integration of multi-layered elements, especially when incorporating key elements such as a nurse-led multidisciplinary team, integrated social care, and strong linkages to the longer-term primary and community care. Notwithstanding limitations in generalising the findings, this review builds on the growing body of evidence in this particular area. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: High utilisation of emergency department (ED) among the elderly is of worldwide concern. This study aims to review the effectiveness of interventions targeting the elderly population in reducing ED utilisation. METHODS: Major biomedical databases were searched for relevant studies. Qualitative approach was applied to derive common themes in the myriad interventions and to critically assess the variations influencing interventions' effectiveness. Quality of studies was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPPHP) tool. RESULTS: 36 studies were included. Nine of 16 community-based interventions reported significant reductions in ED utilisation. Five of 20 hospital-based interventions proved effective while another four demonstrated failure. Seven key elements were identified. Ten of 14 interventions associated with significant reduction on ED use integrated at least three of the seven elements. All four interventions with significant negative results lacked five or more of the seven elements. Some key elements including multidisciplinary team, integrated primary care and social care often existed in effective interventions, while were absent in all significantly ineffective ones. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated interventions have mixed effectiveness. Our findings suggest the hospital-based interventions have relatively poorer effects, and should be better connected to the community-based strategies. Interventions seem to achieve the most success with integration of multi-layered elements, especially when incorporating key elements such as a nurse-led multidisciplinary team, integrated social care, and strong linkages to the longer-term primary and community care. Notwithstanding limitations in generalising the findings, this review builds on the growing body of evidence in this particular area. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Keywords:
aged; effectiveness; emergency care systems; emergency department; epidemiology
Authors: Andrew M Briggs; Pim P Valentijn; Jotheeswaran A Thiyagarajan; Islene Araujo de Carvalho Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Corrine I Voils; Alycia A Bristol; Lynne D Richardson; Teresita M Hogan; Abraham A Brody; Micaela N Gladney; Joe Suyama; Luna C Ragsdale; Christine L Binkley; Carmen L Morano; Justine Seidenfeld; Nada Hammouda; Kelly J Ko; Ula Hwang; Susan N Hastings Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 3.451