| Literature DB >> 27545283 |
Chengjian Zheng1, Liang Wang1, Ting Han1, Hailiang Xin1, Yiping Jiang1, Lan Pan2, Xiaoguang Jia2, Luping Qin1.
Abstract
Pruinosanone A (1), a novel spirochromone, was isolated from the roots of Caragana pruinosa. Two biogenetically related isoflavone intermediates, pruinosanones B and C (2 and 3), were also isolated, together with five known analogs identified as 3-hydroxy-9-methoxypterocarpan (4), 7,2'-dihydroxy-4'-methoxyisoflavanol (5), retusin-8-methylether (6), 7,2'-dihydroxy-8,4'-dimethoxy isoflavone (7) and 7,3'-dihydroxy-8,4'-dimethoxy isoflavone (8). The structures of 1-3 were elucidated based on extensive spectroscopic methods. Notably, 1 is the first example of a spirochromone possessing an unprecedented pentacyclic skeleton containing a spiro[benzo[d][1,3]dioxole-2,3'-chroman]-4'-one motif, which was confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. A plausible biosynthetic pathway for 1 was also proposed. Compounds 1-8 were tested for their ability to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages, and compounds 1-3 were the most potent inhibitors of NO production, with IC50 values of 1.96, 1.93 and 1.58 μM, respectively. A structure-activity relationship analysis revealed that the fused 2-isopropenyl-2,3-dihydrofuran moiety plays a vital role in the potency of these compounds. Moreover, 1 was found to significantly inhibit inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein expression, which accounts for the potent inhibition of NO production by this spirochromone.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27545283 PMCID: PMC4992842 DOI: 10.1038/srep31743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Structures of isolated compounds (1–8).
1H and 13C NMR data for 1 (CDCl3).
| No. | No. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2a | 4.64 (d, 12.6) | 70.5 | 3″ | 142.8 | |
| 2b | 4.63 (d, 12.6) | ||||
| 3 | 106.0 | 4″β | 5.12 (d, 3.0) | 112.9 | |
| 4″α | 4.98 (d, 3.0) | ||||
| 4 | 180.7 | 5″ | 1.8 (s) | 17.0 | |
| 5 | 7.89 (d, 8.4) | 130.8 | 1′ | 142.4 | |
| 6 | 6.64 (d, 8.4) | 106.0 | 2′ | 137.6 | |
| 7 | 167.9 | 3′ | 134.0 | ||
| 8 | 113.4 | 4′ | 147.9 | ||
| 9 | 158.1 | 5′ | 6.37 (d, 8.4) | 104.7 | |
| 10 | 113.4 | 6′ | 6.49 (d, 8.4) | 101.4 | |
| 1″β | 3.37 (dd, 16.2, 10.2) | 31.0 | 3′-OCH3 | 4.02 (s) | 60.5 |
| 1″α | 3.04 (dd, 16.2, 7.8) | ||||
| 2″ | 5.37 (dd,10.2, 7.8) | 88.1 | 4′-OCH3 | 3.82 (s) | 56.9 |
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY, HMBC and NOESY correlations of 1–3.
Figure 3Single-crystal X-ray diffraction and ORTEP drawing of pruinosanone A (1).
1H and 13CNMR data for 2 and 3.
| No. | 2 | 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2β | 8.24 (s) | 154.6 | 4.73 (dd, 16.8, 11.4) | 70.6 |
| 2α | 4.55 (dd, 16.8, 5.4) | |||
| 3 | 122.2 | 4.24 (dd, 11.4, 5.4) | 47.7 | |
| 4 | 175.3 | 192.6 | ||
| 5 | 7.95 (d, 8.4) | 127.6 | 7.83 (d, 8.4) | 129.2 |
| 6 | 7.04 (d, 8.4) | 108.8 | 6.57 (d, 8.4) | 103.9 |
| 7 | 164.7 | 166.9 | ||
| 8 | 113.7 | 113.0 | ||
| 9 | 153.5 | 159.3 | ||
| 10 | 118.6 | 115.5 | ||
| 1′ | 113.9 | 115.3 | ||
| 2′ | 149.4 | 148.6 | ||
| 3′ | 136.9 | 136.5 | ||
| 4′ | 153.5 | 152.7 | ||
| 5′ | 6.58 (d, 8.4) | 103.6 | 6.51 (d, 8.4) | 103.2 |
| 6′ | 6.90 (d, 8.4) | 126.3 | 6.76 (d, 8.4) | 124.5 |
| 3′-OCH3 | 3.72 (s) | 60.6 | 3.83 (s) | 59.7 |
| 4′-OCH3 | 3.82 (s) | 56.2 | 3.86 (s) | 55.0 |
| 1″β | 3.63 (dd, 15.6, 9.6) | 31.1 | 3.38 (dd, 15.6, 9.6) | 30.7 |
| 1″α | 3.22 (dd, 15.6, 7.8) | 3.00 (dd, 15.6, 7.8) | ||
| 2″ | 5.54 (dd, 9.6, 7.8) | 87.8 | 5.37 (dd, 9.6, 7.8) | 87.8 |
| 3″ | 143.6 | 143.7 | ||
| 4″β | 5.14 (s) | 113.1 | 5.12 (s) | 111.2 |
| 4″α | 4.98 (s) | 4.97 (s) | ||
| 5″ | 1.77 (s) | 17.2 | 1.80 (s) | 15.7 |
Figure 4Proposed biosynthetic pathway for pruinosanone A (1).
Effects of compounds 1–8 on NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells (n = 3)a.
| Compound | NO inhibition (%) at a dose of 10.0 μM; mean ± SD | IC50 (μM) |
|---|---|---|
| 99.33 ± 1.51 | 1.96 | |
| 75.98 ± 2.64 | 1.93 | |
| 94.38 ± 2.14 | 1.58 | |
| 2.43 ± 0.94 | >100 | |
| 7.51 ± 2.33 | >100 | |
| 6.89 ± 3.04 | >100 | |
| 10.60 ± 2.31 | >100 | |
| 11.40 ± 1.99 | >100 | |
| AG | 23.55 ± 1.69 | 20.13 |
aLPS: negative control.
bAG: aminoguanidine, positive control.
Figure 5(A) Inhibitory effect of pruinosanone A (1) on NO production in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages (Control: 1 μg/mL LPS; AG: aminoguanidine, 20 μΜ, as a positive control). (B) Effects of pruinosanones A-C (1–3) on the cell viability of RAW 264.7 cells. (C) Western blot analysis of iNOS protein. β-actin was used as a loading control. ##p < 0.01 vs blank; *p < 0.05 vs control; **p < 0.01 vs control.