Kristy Kummerow Broman1, Christianne L Roumie2, Melissa K Stewart3, Jason A Castellanos3, John L Tarpley3, Robert S Dittus3, Richard A Pierce3. 1. Department of Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: kristy.l.kummerow@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 3. Department of Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Earlier work suggested that telephone follow-up could be used in lieu of in-person follow-up after surgery, saving patients time and travel and maximizing use of scarce surgeon and facility resources. We report our experience implementing and evaluating telephone postoperative follow-up within an integrated health system. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pre-post evaluation of a general surgery telephone postoperative clinic at a tertiary care Veterans Affairs facility from April 2015 to February 2016. Patients were offered a telephone postoperative visit from a surgical provider in lieu of an in-person clinic visit. Telephone clinic operating procedures were refined through iterative cycles of change using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. The study period included 2 months pre-intervention and 9 months post-intervention. The primary end point was mean number of clinic visits per eligible patient before and after telephone clinic implementation. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency department visits and readmissions before vs after telephone clinic implementation and complication rates in patients scheduled for telephone vs in-person postoperative care. RESULTS: During the study period, 200 patients underwent eligible operations, 29 pre-intervention and 171 post-intervention. In-person clinic use decreased from 0.83 visits per eligible patient pre-intervention to 0.40 after implementation of the telephone clinic (p < 0.01). There was no difference in rates of emergency department presentation or readmission in eligible patients (0.17 visits/patient pre-intervention vs 0.12 post-intervention; p = 0.36). Complication rates were comparable for eligible patients who were and were not scheduled for telephone care (6% vs 8%; p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Telephone postoperative care can be used in select populations as a triage tool to identify patients who require in-person care and decrease overall in-person clinic use. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Earlier work suggested that telephone follow-up could be used in lieu of in-person follow-up after surgery, saving patients time and travel and maximizing use of scarce surgeon and facility resources. We report our experience implementing and evaluating telephone postoperative follow-up within an integrated health system. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pre-post evaluation of a general surgery telephone postoperative clinic at a tertiary care Veterans Affairs facility from April 2015 to February 2016. Patients were offered a telephone postoperative visit from a surgical provider in lieu of an in-person clinic visit. Telephone clinic operating procedures were refined through iterative cycles of change using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. The study period included 2 months pre-intervention and 9 months post-intervention. The primary end point was mean number of clinic visits per eligible patient before and after telephone clinic implementation. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency department visits and readmissions before vs after telephone clinic implementation and complication rates in patients scheduled for telephone vs in-person postoperative care. RESULTS: During the study period, 200 patients underwent eligible operations, 29 pre-intervention and 171 post-intervention. In-person clinic use decreased from 0.83 visits per eligible patient pre-intervention to 0.40 after implementation of the telephone clinic (p < 0.01). There was no difference in rates of emergency department presentation or readmission in eligible patients (0.17 visits/patient pre-intervention vs 0.12 post-intervention; p = 0.36). Complication rates were comparable for eligible patients who were and were not scheduled for telephone care (6% vs 8%; p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Telephone postoperative care can be used in select populations as a triage tool to identify patients who require in-person care and decrease overall in-person clinic use. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Alessandro Paro; Daniel R Rice; J Madison Hyer; Elizabeth Palmer; Aslam Ejaz; Chanza Fahim Shaikh; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Karolina Kamecka; Calogero Foti; Łukasz Gawiński; Marek Matejun; Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska; Marek Kiljański; Marek Krochmalski; Remigiusz Kozłowski; Michał Marczak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Diana Heimes; Philipp Luhrenberg; Nils Langguth; Sebahat Kaya; Christine Obst; Peer W Kämmerer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390