| Literature DB >> 27543276 |
Mulualem Endeshaw1, Fantu Abebe2, Solomon Worku3, Lalem Menber4, Muluken Assress5, Muluken Assefa6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is one of the most commonly encountered hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. For many years, obesity has been suggested to play a role in preeclampsia. However, the hypotheses have been diverse and often revealed inconsistent results. This study has aimed to estimate the effect of obesity and dietary habits on preeclampsia in Bahir Dar City, north-western Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Compliance; MUAC; Obesity; Preeclampsia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27543276 PMCID: PMC4992278 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1029-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Socio-demographic characteristics of women attending ANC and/or skilled delivery service in Bahir Dar City, October 2014
| Variables | Preeclampsia | #COR (95 % CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases # (%) | Controls # (%) | ||||||
| Preeclampsia | Early onset Preeclampsia | Late onset Preeclampsia | |||||
| Individual factors | |||||||
| Age | |||||||
| < 35 years | 123 (82) | 268 (88.7) | Base | 39 | Base | 84 | Base |
| > = 35 years | 28 (18.0) | 34 (11.3) | 2.04 (1.02, 4.07) | 9 | 1.18 (0.92, 1.52) | 19 | 1.77 (0.99,3.26) |
| Residence | |||||||
| Urban | 82 (54.3) | 195 (64.6) | Base | 26 | Base | 56 | Base |
| Rural | 69 (45.7) | 107 (35.4) | 1.53 (1.03, 2.28) | 22 | 1.54 (0.83, 2.85) | 47 | 1.56 (0.99,2.45) |
| Marital status | |||||||
| Married | 141 (93.4) | 281 (93.0) | Base | 45 | 96 | Base | |
| Singlea | 10 (6.6) | 21 (7.0) | 0.95 (0.43, 2.06) | 3 | 1.03 (0.42, 2.49) | 7 | 1.00 (0.40,2.35) |
| Occupation | |||||||
| Employed | 33 (21.8) | 72 (23.8) | Base | 12 | 21 | Base | |
| Merchant | 25 (16.6) | 44 (14.6) | 1.21 (0.65, 2.35) | 8 | 1.09 (0.41, 2.88) | 17 | 1.33 (0.63,2.78) |
| House wife | 93 (61.6) | 186 (61.6) | 1.17 (0.54, 2.54) | 28 | 0.90 (0.43, 1.87) | 65 | 1.21 (0.69,2.13) |
| Education | |||||||
| Unable to read & write | 70 (40.9) | 68 (24.1) | 2.18 (1.19, 4.62) | 27 | 1.11 (0.70 1.73) | 44 | 1.12 (0.71,1.76) |
| Able to read & write | 101 (59.1) | 214 (75.9) | Base | 21 | Base | 59 | Base |
| Monthly Income | |||||||
| < 1500 Birr | 88 (58.3) | 170 (56.3) | 0.92 (0.62, 1.37) | 28 | 0.92 (0.49, 1.70) | 60 | 1.09 (0.70,1.73) |
| > 1500 Birr | 63 (41.7) | 132 (43.7) | Base | 20 | Base | 43 | Base |
aUnmarried, widow and divorced
Univariate analysis of nutritional, dietary and lifestyle factors with incidence of preeclampsia, Bahir Dar City, October, 2014
| Variables | Preeclampsia | #COR (95 % CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes # (%) | No # (%) | Overall preeclampsia | Early Pre-eclampsia | Late onset Preeclampsia | |||
| Nutritional, dietary and lifestyle factors | |||||||
| MUAC | |||||||
| < 23 cm | 41 (27.2) | 115 (38.0) | Base | 16 | Base | 25 | Base |
| 23–24.9 cm | 36 (23.8) | 82 (27.2) | 1.23 (0.72,2.09) | 13 | 1.14 (0.52, 2.49) | 23 | 1.27 (0.67, 2.39) |
| 25 cm and above | 74 (49.0) | 105 (34.8) | 1.98 (1.24, 3.14) | 19 | 1.30 (0.63, 2.66) | 55 | 2.67 (1.38, 4.07) |
| Fruit intake | |||||||
| Yes | 92 (60.9) | 247 (81.8) | 0.35 (0.22,0.54) | 21 | 0.29 (0.15, 0 .54) | 38 | 0.37 (0.22, 0.60) |
| No | 59 (39.1) | 55 (18.2) | Base | 27 | Base | 65 | Base |
| Vegetable intake | |||||||
| Yes | 105 (69.5) | 266 (88.0) | 0.31 (0.12, 0.50) | 31 | 0.35 (0.19, 0.60) | 74 | 0.35 (0.20, 0.61) |
| No | 46 (30.5) | 36 (12.0) | Base | 17 | Base | 29 | Base |
| Meat/animal product intake | |||||||
| Yes | 143 (94.7) | 281 (93.0) | 1.34 (1.06, 2.28) | 44 | 1.22 (0.39, 3.71) | 99 | 1.86 (0.62, 5.56) |
| No | 8 (5.3) | 21 (7.0) | Base | 4 | Base | 4 | Base |
| Coffee intake | |||||||
| Yes | 124 (82.1) | 198 (65.6) | 2.41 (1.49,3.90) | 43 | 4.51 (1.73, 11.75) | 81 | 1.97 (1.12, 3.22) |
| No | 27 (17.9) | 104 (34.4) | Base | 5 | Base | 22 | Base |
| Folate intake | |||||||
| Yes | 99 (65.6) | 283 (93.7) | 0.13 (0.07,0.23) | 31 | 0.12 (0.06, 0.26) | 68 | 0.13 (0.07, 0.24) |
| No | 52 (34.4) | 19 (6.3) | Base | 17 | Base | 35 | Base |
| Anemia ( | |||||||
| Yes | 18 (14.9) | 10 (4.9) | 3.96 (1.54, 10.17) | 5 | 1.11 (0.13, 9.27) | 13 | 5.52 (2.11, 14.44) |
| No | 103 (85.1) | 192 (95.1) | Base | 47 | Base | 38 | |
| Alcohol intake | |||||||
| Yes | 80 (53.0) | 122 (40.4) | 1.66 (1.12, 2.46) | 26 | 1.63 (1.04, 2.55) | 54 | 1.61 (1.03, 2.52) |
| No | 71 (47.0) | 180 (59.6) | Base | 22 | Base | 49 | Base |
| Physical exercise | |||||||
| Yes | 118 (78.1) | 254 (84.1) | 0.68 (0.42, 1.11) | 40 | 0.59 (0.32, 1.12) | 78 | 0.64 (0.34, 1.03) |
| No | 33 (21.9) | 48 (15.9) | Base | 8 | Base | 25 | Base |
Result of multivariate logistic regression analysis of covariates with early onset, late onset and overall incidence of preeclampsia, Bahir Dar City, October, 2014
| Covariates | All Preeclampsia | Early Onset Preeclampsia | Late Onset Preeclampsia |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |
| Adjusted OR (95 % CI), | Adjusted OR (95 % CI), | Adjusted OR (95 % CI), | |
| Age | |||
| < 35 years | Basea | Base | Base |
| > = 35 years | 2.07 (1.02, 4.19) | 1.27 (0.48, 3.38) | 1.56 (0.74, 3.24) |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | Base | Base | |
| Rural | 1.43 (0.78, 2.68) | 1.27 (0.49, 3.28) | 1.13 (0.60,2.11) |
| MUAC | |||
| < 23 cm | Base | Base | Base |
| 23–24.9 cm | 1.63 (0.84,2.85) | 1.37 (0.54, 3.48) | 1.24 (0.69,2.56) |
| 25 cm and above | 3.33 (1.87, 5.79)* | 1.98 (0.79, 4.94) | 3.63 (1.89,6.97)* |
| Fruit intake | |||
| Yes | 0.47 (0.27,0.83)* | 0.32 (0.11, 0.96) | 0.34 (0.16, 0.71)* |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Vegetable intake | |||
| Yes | 0.59 (0.30, 1.15) | 0.48 (0.17, 1.35) | 0.21 (0.90, 3.71) |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Coffee intake | |||
| Yes | 2.14 (1.32, 3.46)* | 2.36 (0.84, 6.62) | 1.53 (0.84, 2.83) |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Folate intake | |||
| Yes | 0.18 (0.10, 0.32)* | 0.12 (0.04, 0.33)* | 0.16 (0.08, 0.33)* |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Anemia ( | |||
| Yes | 1.89 (0.64, 5.61) | 1.19 (0.11, 12.82) | 2.97 (0.91, 9.69) |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Alcohol intake | |||
| Yes | 1.31 (0.79, 2.18) | 1.21 (0.56, 2.62) | 0.69 (0.39, 1.20) |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Meat/animal product intake | |||
| Yes | 1.53 (0.56,4.20) | 1.00 (0.25, 4.07) | 3.07 (0.51, 18..66) |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
| Physical exercise | |||
| Yes | 0.28 (0.02, 2.99) | 0.85 (0.32, 2.26) | 0.69 (0.32, 7.00) |
| No | Base | Base | Base |
Adjusted for maternal age, * statistically significant at P value <0.05 with 95 % CI
aReference category
Result of age stratified crude analysis of the effect of MUAC on preeclampsia, Bahir Dar City, October, 2014
| Age | COR | [95 % Conf. Interval] |
|---|---|---|
| The effect of MUAC on Overall preeclampsia when stratified by AGE | ||
| < 35 years | 1.81 | 1.11, 2.99a |
| ≥ 35 years | 0.77 | 0.21, 2.82 |
| The effect of MUAC on Early onset preeclampsia when stratified by AGE | ||
| < 35 years | 1.33 | 0.62, 2.94 |
| ≥ 35 years | 0.62 | 0.10, 4.72 |
| The effect of MUAC on Late onset preeclampsia when stratified by AGE | ||
| < 35 years | 2.09 | 1.16, 3.86a |
| ≥ 35 years | 0.86 | 0.20, 4.03 |
astatistically significant at 95 % CI
Result of age stratified and adjusted analysis of covariates significantly associated with overall, early onset and late onset preeclampsia, Bahir Dar City, October, 2014
| Covariates | Overall Preeclampsia | Early onset Preeclampsia | Late onset preeclampsia | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | |
| Age ≤ 24 years | ||||||
| MUAC: Normal vs underweight | 1.07 | 0.17, 6.67 | 0.30 | 0.07, 1.34 | 1.53 | 0.71, 3.29 |
| Obese vs underweight | 2.31, | 1.06, 5.12a | 1.00 | 0.66, 23.93 | 3.66 | 1.37, 10.87a |
| Fruit intake: yes vs no | 0.30 | 0.13, 0.72a | 0.71 | 0.17, 3.18 | 0.25 | 0.09, 0.68a |
| Adherence to folate: yes vs no | 0.16 | 0.05, 0.46a | 0.71 | 0.17, 3.18 | 0.09 | 0.02, 0.42a |
| Coffee consumption : yes vs no | 4.39 | 1.32, 14.56a | 0.67 | 0.13, 3.34 | 3.87 | 1.31, 13.79a |
| Age 25–29 years | ||||||
| MUAC: Normal vs underweight | 2.21 | 0.58, 8.47 | 5.75 | 0.64, 51.57 | 1.89 | 0.68, 5.26 |
| Obese vs underweight | 3.16 | 1.21, 8.24a | 5.16 | 0.55, 48.40 | 1.98 | 1.16, 3.40a |
| Fruit intake: yes vs no | 0.74 | 0.26, 2.12 | 0.52 | 0.12, 2.33 | 0.64 | 0.22, 1.81 |
| Adherence to folate: yes vs no | 0.11 | 0.03, 0.38a | 0.86 | 0.08, 8.54 | 0.09 | 0.03, 0.30a |
| Coffee consumption : yes vs no | 1.24 | 0.51, 3.01 | 0.25 | 0.03, 2.09 | – | – |
| Age 30–34 years | ||||||
| MUAC: Normal vs underweight | 1.16 | 0.40, 3.35 | 2.76 | 0.20, 36.77 | 0.64 | 0.42, 3.94 |
| Obese vs underweight | 1.04 | 0.26, 4.13 | 2.86 | 0.26, 31.53 | 0.91 | 0.42, 1.97 |
| Fruit intake: yes vs no | 0.41 | 0.11, 1.49 | 0.04 | 0.03, 1.49 | 0.70 | 0.16, 2.97 |
| Adherence to folate: yes vs no | 0.12 | 0.03, 0.47a | 0.03 | 0.02, 0.27a | 0.20 | 0.04, 0.93a |
| Coffee consumption : yes vs no | 1.14 | 0.29, 4.51 | 0.50 | 0.04, 6.63 | – | – |
| Age >35 years | ||||||
| MUAC: Normal vs underweight | 0.38 | 0.06, 2.38 | 0.37 | 0.03, 4.06 | 0.90 | 0.16, 5.04 |
| Obese vs underweight | 3.45 | 0.53, 22.54 | 2.87 | 0.21, 39.07 | 1.57 | 0.62, 3.97 |
| Fruit intake: yes vs no | 0.21 | 0.05, 0.94a | 0.15 | 0.01, 1.73 | 0.22 | 0.05, 1.05 |
| Adherence to folate: yes vs no | 0.23 | 0.03, 1.54 | 0.21 | 0.02, 1.87 | 0.13 | 0.02, 0.80a |
| Coffee consumption : yes vs no | 3.67 | 0.52, 25.69 | Omitted | – | – | |
aStatistically significant after controlling for age through adjusted stratification