David Lubans1, Justin Richards2, Charles Hillman3, Guy Faulkner4, Mark Beauchamp4, Michael Nilsson5, Paul Kelly6, Jordan Smith7, Lauren Raine3, Stuart Biddle8. 1. Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, Australia; david.lubans@newcastle.edu.au. 2. Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Australia; 3. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois, Illinois; 4. School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 5. Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, Australia; 6. Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 7. Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Education, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, Australia; 8. Institute of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, Victoria University, Australia.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Physical activity can improve cognitive and mental health, but the underlying mechanisms have not been established. OBJECTIVE: To present a conceptual model explaining the mechanisms for the effect of physical activity on cognitive and mental health in young people and to conduct a systematic review of the evidence. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Ovid Medline, SportDiscus, and Embase) were used. STUDY SELECTION: School-, home-, or community-based physical activity intervention or laboratory-based exercise interventions were assessed. Studies were eligible if they reported statistical analyses of changes in the following: (1) cognition or mental health; and (2) neurobiological, psychosocial, and behavioral mechanisms. DATA EXTRACTION: Data relating to methods, assessment period, participant characteristics, intervention type, setting, and facilitator/delivery were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles reporting results from 22 studies were included. Mechanisms studied were neurobiological (6 studies), psychosocial (18 studies), and behavioral (2 studies). Significant changes in at least 1 potential neurobiological mechanism were reported in 5 studies, and significant effects for at least 1 cognitive outcome were also found in 5 studies. One of 2 studies reported a significant effect for self-regulation, but neither study reported a significant impact on mental health. LIMITATIONS: Small number of studies and high levels of study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest evidence was found for improvements in physical self-perceptions, which accompanied enhanced self-esteem in the majority of studies measuring these outcomes. Few studies examined neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms, and we were unable to draw conclusions regarding their role in enhancing cognitive and mental health.
CONTEXT: Physical activity can improve cognitive and mental health, but the underlying mechanisms have not been established. OBJECTIVE: To present a conceptual model explaining the mechanisms for the effect of physical activity on cognitive and mental health in young people and to conduct a systematic review of the evidence. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Ovid Medline, SportDiscus, and Embase) were used. STUDY SELECTION: School-, home-, or community-based physical activity intervention or laboratory-based exercise interventions were assessed. Studies were eligible if they reported statistical analyses of changes in the following: (1) cognition or mental health; and (2) neurobiological, psychosocial, and behavioral mechanisms. DATA EXTRACTION: Data relating to methods, assessment period, participant characteristics, intervention type, setting, and facilitator/delivery were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles reporting results from 22 studies were included. Mechanisms studied were neurobiological (6 studies), psychosocial (18 studies), and behavioral (2 studies). Significant changes in at least 1 potential neurobiological mechanism were reported in 5 studies, and significant effects for at least 1 cognitive outcome were also found in 5 studies. One of 2 studies reported a significant effect for self-regulation, but neither study reported a significant impact on mental health. LIMITATIONS: Small number of studies and high levels of study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest evidence was found for improvements in physical self-perceptions, which accompanied enhanced self-esteem in the majority of studies measuring these outcomes. Few studies examined neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms, and we were unable to draw conclusions regarding their role in enhancing cognitive and mental health.
Authors: Courtney Barnes; Sam McCrabb; Fiona Stacey; Nicole Nathan; Sze Lin Yoong; Alice Grady; Rachel Sutherland; Rebecca Hodder; Christine Innes-Hughes; Marc Davies; Luke Wolfenden Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Emily Pluhar; Caitlin McCracken; Kelsey L Griffith; Melissa A Christino; Dai Sugimoto; William P Meehan Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Freya Oswald; Jennifer Campbell; Chloë Williamson; Justin Richards; Paul Kelly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Garcia Ashdown-Franks; Joseph Firth; Rebekah Carney; Andre F Carvalho; Mats Hallgren; Ai Koyanagi; Simon Rosenbaum; Felipe B Schuch; Lee Smith; Marco Solmi; Davy Vancampfort; Brendon Stubbs Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 11.136