Literature DB >> 27539361

Recruitment and Retention of Volunteers in a Citizen Science Network to Detect Invasive Species on Private Lands.

David A Andow1, Eugene Borgida2, Terrance M Hurley3, Allison L Williams2.   

Abstract

Volunteer citizen monitoring is an increasingly important source of scientific data. We developed a volunteer program for early detection of new invasive species by private landowners on their own land. Early detection of an invasive species, however, subjects the landowner to the potentially costly risk of government intervention to control the invasive species. We hypothesized that an adult experiential learning module could increase recruitment and retention because private landowners could learn more about and understand the social benefits of early detection and more accurately gauge the level of personal risk. The experiential learning module emphasized group discussion and individual reflection of risks and benefits of volunteering and included interactions with experts and regulatory personnel. A population of woodland owners with >2 ha of managed oak woodland in central Minnesota were randomly assigned to recruitment treatments: (a) the experiential learning module or (b) a letter inviting their participation. The recruitment and retention rates and data quality were similar for the two methods. However, volunteers who experienced the learning module were more likely to recruit new volunteers than those who merely received an invitation letter. Thus the module may indirectly affect recruitment of new volunteers. The data collection was complex and required the volunteers to complete timely activities, yet the volunteers provided sufficiently high quality data that was useful to the organizers. Volunteers can collect complex data and are willing to assume personal risk to contribute to early detection of invasive species.

Keywords:  Citizen science; Early detection; Invasive species; Volunteer citizen monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27539361     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0746-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  11 in total

Review 1.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.

Authors:  Cathy C Conrad; Krista G Hilchey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Ornithology. Citizen scientists supplement work of Cornell researchers.

Authors:  Yudhijit Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.

Authors:  David M Lodge; Susan Williams; Hugh J MacIsaac; Keith R Hayes; Brian Leung; Sarah Reichard; Richard N Mack; Peter B Moyle; Maggie Smith; David A Andow; James T Carlton; Anthony McMichael
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach.

Authors:  E G Clary; M Snyder; R D Ridge; J Copeland; A A Stukas; J Haugen; P Miene
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-06

5.  Can citizen science survey non-indigenous fish species in the eastern Mediterranean Sea?

Authors:  P Bodilis; P Louisy; M Draman; H O Arceo; P Francour
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy.

Authors:  Alycia W Crall; Rebecca Jordan; Kirstin Holfelder; Gregory J Newman; Jim Graham; Donald M Waller
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-04-10

7.  Evaluating the quality of citizen-scientist data on pollinator communities.

Authors:  C Kremen; K S Ullman; R W Thorp
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 8.  Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?

Authors:  Rick Bonney; Tina B Phillips; Heidi L Ballard; Jody W Enck
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2015-10-07

9.  An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns.

Authors:  Ria Follett; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What Is Citizen Science?--A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Kullenberg; Dick Kasperowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Australian Roadkill Reporting Project-Applying Integrated Professional Research and Citizen Science to Monitor and Mitigate Roadkill in Australia.

Authors:  Bruce Englefield; Melissa Starling; Bethany Wilson; Caidyrn Roder; Paul McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.