| Literature DB >> 27539060 |
Luis C Berrocal-Almanza1,2, Surabhi Goyal1, Abid Hussain3, Tilman E Klassert2, Dominik Driesch4, Zarko Grozdanovic5, Gadamm Sumanlatha3, Niyaz Ahmed6, Vijayalakshmi Valluri7, Melanie L Conrad1, Nickel Dittrich1, Ralf R Schumann1, Birgit Lala8, Hortense Slevogt2.
Abstract
Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) results in lung functional impairment and there are no surrogate markers to monitor the extent of lung involvement. We investigated the clinical significance of S100A12 and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) for predicting the extent of lung involvement. We performed an observational study in India with 119 newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, sputum smear positive, HIV-negative PTB patients and 163 healthy controls. All patients were followed-up for six months. Sociodemographic variables and the serum levels of S100A12, sRAGE, esRAGE, HMGB-1, TNF-α, IFN-γ and CRP were measured. Lung involvement in PTB patients was assessed by chest radiography. Compared with healthy controls, PTB patients had increased serum concentrations of S100A12 while sRAGE was decreased. S100A12 was an independent predictor of disease occurrence (OR 1.873, 95%CI 1.212-2.891, p = 0.004). Under DOTS therapy, S100A12 decreased significantly after 4 months whereas CRP significantly decreased after 2 months (p < 0.0001). Importantly, although CRP was also an independent predictor of disease occurrence, only S100A12 was a significant predictor of lung alveolar infiltration (OR 2.60, 95%CI 1.35-5.00, p = 0.004). These results suggest that S100A12 has the potential to assess the extent of alveolar infiltration in PTB.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27539060 PMCID: PMC4990910 DOI: 10.1038/srep31798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics, related parameters and serum levels of CRP, S100A12, sRAGE and HMGB-1 in TB cases and controls.
| Variable | Case (n = 119) | Control (n = 163) | P value (Crude) | P value (Adjusted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age mean (SD), (Years) | 26 ± 11 | 32 ± 10 | <0.0001 | — |
| Sex No. (%), male/female | 58 (49)/61 (51) | 82 (50)/81 (49) | 0.81 | — |
| BMI mean (SD), (Kg/m2) | 16 ± 2.6 | 24 ± 4.5 | <0.0001 | <0.0001a |
| Smoking habits mean (SD), pack-year | 0.21 ± 0.83 | 0.07 ± 0.28 | 0.043 | 0.004a |
| Drinking habits No. (%), (yes/no) | 22 (19)/97 (81) | 3 (2)/160 (98) | <0.0001 | <0.0001a |
| Fasting blood glucose mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 97 ± 30 | 104 ± 30 | 0.06 | — |
| Blood pressure mean (SD), (mm/Hg) | ||||
| Systolic | 103 ± 15 | 123 ± 17 | <0.0001 | <0.0001a,b |
| Diastolic | 74 ± 10 | 80 ± 12 | <0.0001 | 0.97a,b |
| Cholesterol mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 167 ± 27 | 183 ± 33 | <0.0001 | 0.73b |
| LDL mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 104 ± 25 | 115 ± 25 | <0.0001 | 0.77b |
| HDL mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 41 ± 8.8 | 43 ± 33 | 0.37 | — |
| Tryglicerides mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 112 ± 38 | 136 ± 80 | 0.003 | 0.87b |
| Creatinine mean (SD), (mg/dL) | 0.91 ± 0.13 | 0.96 ± 0.17 | 0.005 | 0.77 b |
| CRP median (IQR), (mg/L) | 6.74 ± 2.15 | 3.18 ± 3.23 | <0.0001 | <0.0001a,b,c,d,e |
| TNF-α mean (SD), (pg/mL) | 13.4 ± 21.8 | 6.1 ± 20.4 | 0.004 | 0.02a,b,c,d,e |
| IFN-γ median (IQR), (pg/mL) | 7.0 ± 18 | 3.7 ± 11 | 0.17 | — |
| S100A12 mean (SD), (ng/mL) | 2.332 ± 1.631 | 1.090 ± 1.050 | <0.0001 | <0.0001a,b,c,d,e |
| sRAGE mean (SD), (ng/mL) | 0.74 ± 0.54 | 1.002 ± 0.563 | <0.0001 | 0.003a,b,c,d,e |
| esRAGE mean (SD), (ng/mL) | 0.06 ± 0.15 | 0.07 ± 0.10 | 0.65 | — |
| HMGB-1 median (IQR), (ng/mL) | 3.3 ± 5.5 | 3.0 ± 5.6 | 0.67 | — |
Adjusted for: aAge, bBMI, cSmoking habits, dDrinking habits and eSystolic BP by binary logistic regression. (SD) standard deviation, (IQR) interquartile range.
Univariable logistic regression analysis: predictors of disease occurrence.
| Predictor | β | S.E | P value | Exp β (OR) | 95%CI for Exp β |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.646 | 0.225 | <0.0001 | 5.186 | 3.336–8.063 | |
| 0.681 | 0.108 | <0.0001 | 1.974 | 1.592–2.443 | |
| −0.483 | 0.206 | 0.019 | 0.613 | 0.413–0.924 | |
| 0.019 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 1.024 | 1.005–1.034 | |
| −0.051 | 0.012 | <0.0001 | 0.954 | 0.927–0.973 | |
| −0.650 | 0.073 | <0.0001 | 0.523 | 0.452–0.603 | |
| −0.081 | 0.011 | <0.0001 | 0.924 | 0.903–0.944 | |
| −0.009 | 0.005 | 0.081 | 0.992 | 0.979–1.001 | |
| −0.566 | 0.319 | 0.076 | 1.763 | 0.943–3.291 | |
| 2.487 | 0.629 | <0.0001 | 12.02 | 3.505–41.23 |
Models parameters: Model 1 CRP: constant: −8.20, −2Log likelihood 185-Chi2 < 0.0001, Hosmer and lemeshow test <0.0001, R2 (Cox 0.49 and Nagelkerke 0.67). Model 2 S100A12: constant: −1.42, −2Log likelihood 328-Chi2 < 0.0001, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.01, R2 (Cox 0.17 and Nagelkerke 0.23). Model 3 sRAGE: constant: 0.206, −2Log likelihood 405-Chi2 0.016, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.64, R2 (Cox 0.019 and Nagelkerke 0.026). Model 4 TNF-α: constant: −0.48, −2Log likelihood 375-Chi2 0.016, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.07, R2 (Cox 0.03 and Nagelkerke 0.04). Model 5 Age: constant: 1.17, −2Log likelihood 392-Chi2 0.002, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.82, R2 (Cox 0.06 and Nagelkerke 0.08). Model 6 BMI: constant: 12.05, −2Log likelihood 170.5-Chi2 < 0.0001, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.88, R2 (Cox 0.55 and Nagelkerke 0.73). Model 7 Systolic BP: constant: 8.8, −2Log likelihood 312.1-Chi2 < 0.0001, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.21, R2 (Cox 0.24 and Nagelkerke 0.33). Model 8 Fasting blood glucose: constant: 0.66, −2Log likelihood 403.8-Chi2 0.048, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.86, R2 (Cox 0.012 and Nagelkerke 0.017). Model 9 Smoking habits: constant: −0.302, −2Log likelihood 405-Chi2 0.032, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.001, R2 (Cox 0.01 and Nagelkerke 0.02). Model 10 Drinking habits: constant: −0.494, −2Log likelihood 358-Chi2 < 0.0001, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.001, R2 (Cox 0.08 and Nagelkerke 0.11).
Multivariable logistic regression analysis: S100A12 and sRAGE are independent predictors of disease occurrence.
| Predictor | Β | S.E | P value | Exp β (OR) | 95%CI for Exp β |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRP | 1.289 | 0.299 | <0.0001 | 3.61 | 2.008–6.488 |
| S100A12 | 0.608 | 0.299 | 0.042 | 1.837 | 1.022–3.305 |
| sRAGE | −1.668 | 0.910 | 0.067 | 0.189 | 0.032–1.122 |
| TNF-α | 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.473 | 1.012 | 0.980–1.046 |
| BMI | −0.608 | 0.143 | <0.0001 | 0.932 | 0.411–0.720 |
| Systolic BP | −0.071 | 0.033 | 0.030 | 0.932 | 0.874–0.993 |
Model parameters: constant: 14.32, −2Log likelihood 42-Chi2 < 0.0001, Hosmer and lemeshow test 0.94, R2 (Cox 0.67 and Nagelkerke 0.92). Cases n = 110, Controls n = 160.
Figure 1CRP, S100A12, systolic BP and BMI values change longitudinally during disease recovery under DOTS treatment.
TB patients were followed up during the antibiotic treatment on average 6 months and the values of (a) CRP, (b) S100A12, (c) systolic BP and (d) BMI were compared over time at 0, 2, 4 and 6 months in those individuals for which the four measurements were available, significance was tested by Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests in (a–c) and represented as the median ± interquartile range (IQR) or with repeated measure ANOVA with post hoc test in (d) and represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). n = 28 in (a), 42 in (b), 50 in (c) and 55 in (d) individuals per time point. Time interval is given in months.
Figure 2TB patients have increased neutrophil counts and decreased lymphocyte counts in their peripheral blood when compared to healthy controls.
(a) Total WBC, (b) Neutrophil count, (c) Monocyte count, (d) Lymphocyte count and (e) Eosinophil count. Data are presented as the median ± interquartile range (IQR) and significance was tested with Mann Whitney U tests. n = 51 for cases and 43 for controls.
Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis: neutrophils are positive predictors of S100A12 serum levels.
| Predictor | Β | S.E | P value | 95%CI for β |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.240 | 0.078 | 0.011 | 0.068–0.412 | |
| 0.265 | 0.094 | 0.016 | 0.059–0.470 | |
| 7.945 | 3.947 | 0.069 | −0.742–16.63 | |
| 0.975 | 0.474 | 0.064 | −0.069–2.019 | |
| 9.421 | 4.126 | 0.012 | 2.541–16.32 | |
| Multivariable | ||||
| 0.265 | 0.094 | 0.016 | 0.059–0.470 | |
Models parameters: Model 1: WBC. Constant 867, ANOVA 0.011, R2 0.41. Model 2: Neutrophils. Constant 1417, ANOVA 0.016, R2 0.36. Model 3: Monocytes. Constant 1596, ANOVA 0.069, R2 0.20. Model 4: Lymphocytes. Constant 607, ANOVA 0.064, R2 0.21. Model 5: Eosinophils. Constant 1614, ANOVA 0.012, R2 0.40. Model 6: Constant 1417, ANOVA 0.016, R2 0.36. Other variables in model 6: Lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils.
Univariable and multivariable ordinal regression: S100A12 is a positive predictor for the extent of alveolar infiltration in the CXR of patients with pulmonary TB.
| Predictor | Β | S.E | P value | Exp. β (OR) | 95% for Exp. β (OR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.165 | 0.084 | 0.050 | 1.18 | 1.00–1.39 | |
| 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.049 | 1.01 | 1.00–1.01 | |
| 0.317 | 0.112 | 0.005 | 1.37 | 1.10–1.71 | |
| Multivariable | |||||
| | −0.106 | 0.228 | 0.643 | 0.90 | 0.58–1.41 |
| Monocytes | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.272 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.03 |
| S100A12 | 0.956 | 0.333 | 0.004 | 2.60 | 1.35–5.00 |
Dependent ordinal variable alveolar infiltration (None, 1 quadrant, 2 quadrants, 3 quadrants and 4 quadrants). Models parameters: Model 1 −2Log 128 Chi2 0.052, Goodness of fit 0.47, Pseudo R2 (Cox and snell 0.075, Nagelkerke 0.081), test of parallel lines 0.516; n = 51. Model 2 −2Log 118 Chi2 0.051, Goodness of fit 0.66, Pseudo R2 (Cox and snell 0.076, Nagelkerke 0.081), test of parallel lines 0.490; n = 51 Model 3 −2Log 295 Chi2 0.005, Goodness of fit 0.79, Pseudo R2 (Cox and snell 0.068, Nagelkerke 0.073), test of parallel lines 0.089; n = 112. Model 4 −2Log 70 Chi2 0.002, Goodness of fit 0.83, Pseudo R2 (Cox and snell 0.39, Nagelkerke 0.42), test of parallel lines 0.47; n = 51. Reference category: alveolar infiltration 4 quadrants.