Literature DB >> 27537411

Acute Responses to Resistance and High-Intensity Interval Training in Early Adolescents.

Nigel K Harris1, Deborah K Dulson, Greig R M Logan, Isaac B Warbrick, Fabrice L R Merien, David R Lubans.   

Abstract

Harris, NK, Dulson, DK, Logan, GRM, Warbrick, IB, Merien, FLR, and Lubans, DR. Acute responses to resistance and high-intensity interval training in early adolescents. J Strength Cond Res 31(5): 1177-1186, 2017-The purpose of this study was to compare the acute physiological responses within and between resistance training (RT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) matched for time and with comparable effort, in a school setting. Seventeen early adolescents (12.9 ± 0.3 years) performed both RT (2-5 repetitions perceived short of failure at the end of each set) and HIIT (90% of age-predicted maximum heart rate), equated for total work set and recovery period durations comprising of 12 "sets" of 30-second work followed by 30-second recovery (total session time 12 minutes). Variables of interest included oxygen consumption, set and session heart rate (HR), and rate of perceived exertion, and change in salivary cortisol (SC), salivary alpha amylase, and blood lactate (BL) from presession to postsession. Analyses were conducted to determine responses within and between the 2 different protocols. For both RT and HIIT, there were very large increases pretrial to posttrial for SC and BL, and only BL increased greater in HIIT (9.1 ± 2.6 mmol·L) than RT (6.8 ± 3.3 mmol·L). Mean set HR for both RT (170 ± 9.1 b·min) and HIIT (179 ± 5.6 b·min) was at least 85% of HRmax. V[Combining Dot Above]O2 over all 12 sets was greater for HIIT (33.8 ± 5.21 ml·kg·min) than RT (24.9 ± 3.23 ml·kg·min). Brief, repetitive, intermittent forays into high but not supramaximal intensity exercise using RT or HIIT seemed to be a potent physiological stimulus in adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27537411     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  Feasibility of incorporating high-intensity interval training into physical education programs to improve body composition and cardiorespiratory capacity of overweight and obese children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro Delgado-Floody; Pedro Latorre-Román; Daniel Jerez-Mayorga; Felipe Caamaño-Navarrete; Felipe García-Pinillos
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.103

2.  Physical workload and glycemia changes during football matches in adolescents with type 1 diabetes can be comparable.

Authors:  Andrzej Gawrecki; Arkadiusz Michalak; Szymon Gałczyński; Iwona Dachowska; Dorota Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz; Agnieszka Szadkowska
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  A Comparison of the Gluco-Regulatory Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise and Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Brett A Gordon; Caroline J Taylor; Jarrod E Church; Stephen D Cousins
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  High-intensity interval training in high-school physical education classes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  André Filipe Paulino da Silva Bento; Luis Carrasco Páez; Armando Manuel de Mendonça Raimundo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-11-12

5.  Acute Cardiometabolic Responses to Medicine Ball Interval Training in Children.

Authors:  Avery D Faigenbaum; Jie Kang; Nicholas A Ratamess; Anne Farrell; Nicole Ellis; Ira Vought; Jill Bush
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.