Literature DB >> 27537002

Psychometrics of shared decision making and communication as patient centered measures for two language groups.

Kiara Alvarez1, Ye Wang1, Margarita Alegria1, Andrea Ault-Brutus2, Natasha Ramanayake1, Yi-Hui Yeh1, Julia R Jeffries3, Patrick E Shrout4.   

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) and effective patient-provider communication are key and interrelated elements of patient-centered care that impact health and behavioral health outcomes. Measurement of SDM and communication from the patient's perspective is necessary in order to ensure that health care systems and individual providers are responsive to patient views. However, there is a void of research addressing the psychometric properties of these measures with diverse patients, including non-English speakers, and in the context of behavioral health encounters. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of 2 patient-centered outcome measures, the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-9 (SDM-Q) and the Kim Alliance Scale-Communication subscale (KAS-CM), in a sample of 239 English and Spanish-speaking behavioral health patients. One dominant factor was found for each scale and this structure was used to examine whether there was measurement invariance across the 2 language groups. One SDM-Q item was inconsistent with the configural invariance comparison and was removed. The remaining SDM-Q items exhibited strong invariance, meaning that item loadings and item means were similar across the 2 groups. The KAS-CM items had limited variability, with most respondents indicating high communication levels, and the invariance analysis was done on binary versions of the items. These had metric invariance (loadings the same over groups) but several items violated the strong invariance test. In both groups, the SDM-Q had high internal consistency, whereas the KAS-CM was only adequate. These findings help interpret results for individual patients, taking into account cultural and linguistic differences in how patients perceive SDM and patient-provider communication. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27537002      PMCID: PMC5431590          DOI: 10.1037/pas0000344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  50 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

3.  Measuring patient-centredness: a comparison of three observation-based instruments.

Authors:  N Mead; P Bower
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

4.  The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of five mental health outcome measures.

Authors:  Leida E Matías-Carrelo; Ligia M Chávez; Gisela Negrón; Glorisa Canino; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Sue Hoppe
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09

Review 5.  Shared decision making in psychiatry.

Authors:  J Hamann; S Leucht; W Kissling
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations.

Authors:  P Little; H Everitt; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; C Gould; K Ferrier; S Payne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

7.  The Kim Alliance Scale: development and preliminary testing.

Authors:  S C Kim; D Boren; S L Solem
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.075

8.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Authors:  M Stewart; J B Brown; A Donner; I R McWhinney; J Oates; W W Weston; J Jordan
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Cultural consultation: a model of mental health service for multicultural societies.

Authors:  Laurence J Kirmayer; Danielle Groleau; Jaswant Guzder; Caminee Blake; Eric Jarvis
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.356

10.  Prejudice, clinical uncertainty and stereotyping as sources of health disparities.

Authors:  Ana I Balsa; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.883

View more
  9 in total

1.  Delivery of Community-Based Care Through Inter-professional Teams in Brazil's Unified Health System (UHS): Comparing Perceptions Across Community Health Agents (CHAs), Nurses and Physicians.

Authors:  Rahbel Rahman; Rogério Meireles Pinto; Margareth Santos Zanchetta; Melanie M Wall
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-12

2.  Does Shared Decision Making Actually Occur in the Emergency Department? Looking at It from the Patients' Perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Marc A Probst; Denise D Quigley; Peter St Marie; Nikita Nayyar; Sarah H Sabbagh; Tanesha Beckford; Hemal K Kanzaria
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Effectiveness of the DECIDE Interventions on Shared Decision Making and Perceived Quality of Care in Behavioral Health With Multicultural Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Margarita Alegria; Ora Nakash; Kirsten Johnson; Andrea Ault-Brutus; Nicholas Carson; Mirko Fillbrunn; Ye Wang; Alice Cheng; Treniece Harris; Antonio Polo; Alisa Lincoln; Elmer Freeman; Benjamin Bostdorf; Marcos Rosenbaum; Claudia Epelbaum; Martin LaRoche; Ebele Okpokwasili-Johnson; MaJose Carrasco; Patrick E Shrout
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 4.  The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fania R Gärtner; Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Ian P Smith; Isabelle Scholl; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  How Ethnic Minority Context Alters the Risk for Developing Mental Health Disorders and Psychological Distress for Latinx Young Adults.

Authors:  Margarita Alegría; Mario Cruz-Gonzalez; Kiara Alvarez; Glorisa Canino; Cristiane Duarte; Hector Bird; Maria Ramos-Olazagasti; Sheri Lapatin Markle; Isabel O'Malley; Doriliz Vila; Patrick E Shrout
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.

Authors:  Yuko Goto; Hisayuki Miura; Daisuke Son; Hidenori Arai; Levente Kriston; Isabelle Scholl; Martin Härter; Kotaro Sato; Tesshu Kusaba
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2020-07-07

7.  Measurement Invariance of Screening Measures of Anxiety, Depression, and Level of Functioning in a US Sample of Minority Older Adults Assessed in Four Languages.

Authors:  Mario Cruz-Gonzalez; Patrick E Shrout; Kiara Alvarez; Isaure Hostetter; Margarita Alegría
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Psychometric Properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9): Validation of the Italian Version in a Large Psychiatric Clinical Sample.

Authors:  Renato de Filippis; Matteo Aloi; Anna Maria Pilieci; Federica Boniello; Daria Quirino; Luca Steardo; Cristina Segura-Garcia; Pasquale De Fazio
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2022-08

9.  Using Standardized Videos to Examine the Validity of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: Results of a Randomized Online Experiment.

Authors:  K D Valentine; Brittney Mancini; Ha Vo; Suzanne Brodney; Carol Cosenza; Michael J Barry; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.583

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.