Literature DB >> 27536997

Prediction models: the right tool for the right problem.

Teus H Kappen1, Linda M Peelen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Perioperative prediction models can help to improve personalized patient care by providing individual risk predictions to both patients and providers. However, the scientific literature on prediction model development and validation can be quite technical and challenging to understand. This article aims to provide the necessary insight for clinicians to assess the value of a prediction model that they intend to use in their clinical practice. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent developments in prediction model research include the continuous development of new performance characteristics for prediction models, increasing insight into the limitations of old characteristics, as well as an improved understanding of the generalizability of prediction models to new populations and practices.
SUMMARY: Clinicians can assess the value of a prediction model for their practice by first identifying what the usage of the model will be. Second, they can recognize which performance characteristics are relevant to their assessment of the model. Finally, they need to decide whether the available scientific evidence sufficiently matches their clinical practice to proceed with implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27536997     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  8 in total

1.  Identifying the Target Population for Primary Respiratory Syncytial Virus Two-Step Prevention in Infants: Normative Outcome of Hospitalisation Assessment for Newborns (NOHAN).

Authors:  Marine Jourdain; Mehdi Benchaib; Dominique Ploin; Yves Gillet; Etienne Javouhey; Come Horvat; Mona Massoud; Marine Butin; Olivier Claris; Bruno Lina; Jean-Sebastien Casalegno
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Using the Causal Inference Framework to Support Individualized Drug Treatment Decisions Based on Observational Healthcare Data.

Authors:  Andreas D Meid; Carmen Ruff; Lucas Wirbka; Felicitas Stoll; Hanna M Seidling; Andreas Groll; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Frailty and postoperative complications in older Chinese adults undergoing major thoracic and abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Binru Han; Qiuping Li; Xi Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  A Human(e) Factor in Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Authors:  Tim Bezemer; Mark Ch de Groot; Enja Blasse; Maarten J Ten Berg; Teus H Kappen; Annelien L Bredenoord; Wouter W van Solinge; Imo E Hoefer; Saskia Haitjema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Laura E Cowley; Daniel M Farewell; Sabine Maguire; Alison M Kemp
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2019-08-22

6.  Which Frailty Evaluation Method Can Better Improve the Predictive Ability of the SASA for Postoperative Complications of Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery?

Authors:  Yanyan Yin; Li Jiang; Lixin Xue
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.755

Review 7.  A scoping review of complication prediction models in spinal surgery: An analysis of model development, validation and impact.

Authors:  Toros C Canturk; Daniel Czikk; Eugene K Wai; Philippe Phan; Alexandra Stratton; Wojtek Michalowski; Stephen Kingwell
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-07-14

8.  Imprecise Data and Their Impact on Translational Research in Medicine.

Authors:  Enrico Capobianco
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.