Literature DB >> 27536189

Radiation costing methods: a systematic review.

F Rahman1, S J Seung2, S Y Cheng1, H Saherawala2, C C Earle1, N Mittmann3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Costs for radiation therapy (rt) and the methods used to cost rt are highly diverse across the literature. To date, no study has compared various costing methods in detail. Our objective was to perform a thorough review of the radiation costing literature to identify sources of costs and methods used.
METHODS: A systematic review of Ovid medline, Ovid oldmedline, embase, Ovid HealthStar, and EconLit from 2005 to 23 March 2015 used search terms such as "radiation," "radiotherapy," "neoplasm," "cost," " cost analysis," and "cost benefit analysis" to locate relevant articles. Original papers were reviewed for detailed costing methods. Cost sources and methods were extracted for papers investigating rt modalities, including three-dimensional conformal rt (3D-crt), intensity-modulated rt (imrt), stereotactic body rt (sbrt), and brachytherapy (bt). All costs were translated into 2014 U.S. dollars.
RESULTS: Most of the studies (91%) reported in the 33 articles retrieved provided rt costs from the health system perspective. The cost of rt ranged from US$2,687.87 to US$111,900.60 per treatment for imrt, followed by US$5,583.28 to US$90,055 for 3D-crt, US$10,544.22 to US$78,667.40 for bt, and US$6,520.58 to US$19,602.68 for sbrt. Cost drivers were professional or personnel costs and the cost of rt treatment. Most studies did not address the cost of rt equipment (85%) and institutional or facility costs (66%).
CONCLUSIONS: Costing methods and sources were widely variable across studies, highlighting the need for consistency in the reporting of rt costs. More work to promote comparability and consistency across studies is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiation therapy; cost analyses; cost-effectiveness analyses; costs; cost–benefit analyses

Year:  2016        PMID: 27536189      PMCID: PMC4974046          DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  36 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the cost effectiveness of radiation therapy for prostate cancer from 2003 to 2013.

Authors:  Neha P Amin; David J Sher; Andre A Konski
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.561

2.  Active surveillance vs. treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: a cost comparison.

Authors:  Ahmed Eldefrawy; Devendar Katkoori; Matthew Abramowitz; Mark S Soloway; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  A cost comparison analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy techniques after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Lanni; Martin Keisch; Chirag Shah; Jessica Wobb; Larry Kestin; Frank Vicini
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Protons in head-and-neck cancer: bridging the gap of evidence.

Authors:  Bram L T Ramaekers; Janneke P C Grutters; Madelon Pijls-Johannesma; Philippe Lambin; Manuela A Joore; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for anal cancer.

Authors:  Joseph C Hodges; Muhammad S Beg; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey Meyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of single fraction of stereotactic body radiation therapy compared with single fraction of external beam radiation therapy for palliation of vertebral bone metastases.

Authors:  Hayeon Kim; Malolan S Rajagopalan; Sushil Beriwal; M Saiful Huq; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  An economic analysis of conservative management versus active treatment for men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniella J Perlroth; Jay Bhattacharya; Dana P Goldman; Alan M Garber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

8.  Is proton beam therapy cost effective in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate?

Authors:  Andre Konski; William Speier; Alexandra Hanlon; J Robert Beck; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Variation in the Cost of Radiation Therapy Among Medicare Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Anthony J Paravati; Isabel J Boero; Daniel P Triplett; Lindsay Hwang; Rayna K Matsuno; Beibei Xu; Loren K Mell; James D Murphy
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Two-year and lifetime cost-effectiveness of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Racquel E Kohler; Nathan C Sheets; Stephanie B Wheeler; Chris Nutting; Emma Hall; Bhishamjit S Chera
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

1.  The generation of two specific cancer costing algorithms using Ontario administrative databases.

Authors:  N Mittmann; S Y Cheng; N Liu; S J Seung; F E Saxena; C DeAngelis; N J Look Hong; C C Earle; M C Cheung; N Leighl; N Coburn; W K Evans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Health system costs for cancer medications and radiation treatment in Ontario for the 4 most common cancers: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Ning Liu; Stephanie Y Cheng; Soo Jin Seung; Farah E Saxena; Nicole J Look Hong; Craig C Earle; Matthew C Cheung; Natasha B Leighl; Natalie G Coburn; Carlo DeAngelis; William K Evans
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-03-16

3.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally-advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer-patterns of care and overall survival.

Authors:  Michael J Dohopolski; Scott M Glaser; John A Vargo; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

4.  Effectiveness and toxicity of conventional radiotherapy treatment for painful spinal metastases: a detailed course of side effects after opposing fields versus a single posterior field technique.

Authors:  Paulien G Westhoff; Alexander de Graeff; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Ilse de Pree; Marco van Vulpen; Jan Willem H Leer; Corrie A M Marijnen; Yvette M van der Linden
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-19

5.  Comparison of the efficacy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin-Bin Pan; Kai-Hua Chen; Shi-Ting Huang; Yan-Ming Jiang; Jia-Lin Ma; Zhong-Guo Liang; Song Qu; Ling Li; Long Chen; Xiao-Dong Zhu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-27

6.  Critical review of multidisciplinary non-surgical local interventional ablation techniques in primary or secondary liver malignancies.

Authors:  Attila Kovács; Roberto Iezzi; Francesco Cellini; Valentina Lancellotta; Peter Bischoff; Francesca Carchesio; Luca Tagliaferri; György Kovács; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-12-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.