Literature DB >> 21616691

Active surveillance vs. treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: a cost comparison.

Ahmed Eldefrawy1, Devendar Katkoori, Matthew Abramowitz, Mark S Soloway, Murugesan Manoharan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy are standard curative approaches for low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Active surveillance (AS) is becoming an increasingly accepted management alternative for low-risk PC. Our aim is to compare the cumulative medical costs of treatment vs. AS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We collected data on the cumulative medical costs of open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), and AS at our institution. For physicians' reimbursements, Medicare values of our region were used to maintain uniformity. For inpatient costs other than reimbursements, we used the mean cost at our institution. The costs of RRP and RARP involve preoperative investigations, medical clearance, physicians' fees, inpatient costs, and pathologic examination of prostatectomy specimen and follow-up. The inpatient costs include the operating room, disposable equipment, anesthesia, post-anesthesia care, transfusion, and hospital stay. The cost of EBRT involves the cost of consultation, planning, simulation and treatment sessions, and follow-up. BT costs involved radiotherapy planning as well as inpatients costs. AS protocol involves regular visits, transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies, prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing. To evaluate the cost of treating complications, treatment after AS, and treatment for recurrence, we created a Markov model based on recent studies and our experience.
RESULTS: The cumulative costs of RRP are $9,732 (1 year), $10,360 (2 years), $12,209 (5 years), and $15,084 (10 years). While for RARP, the costs are $17,824 (1 year), $18,308 (2 years), $20,117 (5 years), and $22,762 (10 years). The costs of EBRT are $20,730 (1 year), $20,969 (2 years), $22,043 (5 years), and $23,953 (10 years). BT costs are $14,061 (1 year), $14,300 (2 years), $15,374 (5 years), and $17,284 (10 years). The costs of AS are $1,154 (1 year), $2,308 (2 years), $8,761 (5 years), and $13,116 (10 years).
CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative medical costs of RARP and EBRT are much higher than BT, RRP, and AS. AS is associated with a different cost distribution in which the initial cost is low and relatively higher cost of follow-up. Despite the higher follow-up cost, AS remains the most cost effective alternative for low-risk PC.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21616691     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  18 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robin Wm Vernooij; Michelle Lancee; Anne Cleves; Philipp Dahm; Chris H Bangma; Katja Kh Aben
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 2.  Radiation costing methods: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Rahman; S J Seung; S Y Cheng; H Saherawala; C C Earle; N Mittmann
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience.

Authors:  Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Thiago Camelo Mourão; Ricardo de Lima Favaretto; Thiago Borges Marques Santana; Ademar Lopes; Stenio de Cassio Zequi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 4.  Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Proton Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Florian Rudolf Schroeck; Bruce L Jacobs; Sam B Bhayani; Paul L Nguyen; David Penson; Jim Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Wu Pan; Xin-Ming Cui; Jing-Fei Teng; Dong-Xu Zhang; Zhi-Jun Wang; Fa-Jun Qu; Yi Gao; Xin-Gang Cui; Dan-Feng Xu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer screening between the ages of 55 and 69 years followed by active surveillance.

Authors:  Tiago M de Carvalho; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Direct cost for initial management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  C Sanyal; A G Aprikian; S Chevalier; F L Cury; A Dragomir
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  [Treatment costs of localized prostate cancer in Germany : Economic results from the HAROW observational study].

Authors:  T Reinhold; C Dornquast; C Börgermann; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Importance of cost-effectiveness and value in cancer care and healthcare policy.

Authors:  Ravinder Kang; Philip P Goodney; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer compared with immediate treatment: a Canadian cost comparison.

Authors:  Alice Dragomir; Fabio L Cury; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.