Literature DB >> 27535904

Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration.

Douglas H Schultz1, Michael W Cole2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The human brain is able to exceed modern computers on multiple computational demands (e.g., language, planning) using a small fraction of the energy. The mystery of how the brain can be so efficient is compounded by recent evidence that all brain regions are constantly active as they interact in so-called resting-state networks (RSNs). To investigate the brain's ability to process complex cognitive demands efficiently, we compared functional connectivity (FC) during rest and multiple highly distinct tasks. We found previously that RSNs are present during a wide variety of tasks and that tasks only minimally modify FC patterns throughout the brain. Here, we tested the hypothesis that, although subtle, these task-evoked FC updates from rest nonetheless contribute strongly to behavioral performance. One might expect that larger changes in FC reflect optimization of networks for the task at hand, improving behavioral performance. Alternatively, smaller changes in FC could reflect optimization for efficient (i.e., small) network updates, reducing processing demands to improve behavioral performance. We found across three task domains that high-performing individuals exhibited more efficient brain connectivity updates in the form of smaller changes in functional network architecture between rest and task. These smaller changes suggest that individuals with an optimized intrinsic network configuration for domain-general task performance experience more efficient network updates generally. Confirming this, network update efficiency correlated with general intelligence. The brain's reconfiguration efficiency therefore appears to be a key feature contributing to both its network dynamics and general cognitive ability. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The brain's network configuration varies based on current task demands. For example, functional brain connections are organized in one way when one is resting quietly but in another way if one is asked to make a decision. We found that the efficiency of these updates in brain network organization is positively related to general intelligence, the ability to perform a wide variety of cognitively challenging tasks well. Specifically, we found that brain network configuration at rest was already closer to a wide variety of task configurations in intelligent individuals. This suggests that the ability to modify network connectivity efficiently when task demands change is a hallmark of high intelligence.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/368551-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain connectivity; cognitive control; fMRI; individual differences; intelligence; task switching

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27535904      PMCID: PMC4987432          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0358-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  56 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI.

Authors:  Alexander L Cohen; Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach; Francis M Miezin; Donna Dierker; David C Van Essen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Time-resolved resting-state brain networks.

Authors:  Andrew Zalesky; Alex Fornito; Luca Cocchi; Leonardo L Gollo; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Development of abbreviated nine-item forms of the Raven's standard progressive matrices test.

Authors:  Warren B Bilker; John A Hansen; Colleen M Brensinger; Jan Richard; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2012-05-17

Review 6.  Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Patryk Laurent; Andrea Stocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Gregory C Burgess; Michael P Harms; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Maurizio Corbetta; Matthew F Glasser; Sandra Curtiss; Sachin Dixit; Cindy Feldt; Dan Nolan; Edward Bryant; Tucker Hartley; Owen Footer; James M Bjork; Russ Poldrack; Steve Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Stephen M Smith; Deanna M Barch; Timothy E J Behrens; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Resting-state connectivity of the amygdala is altered following Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Douglas H Schultz; Nicholas L Balderston; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Matthew F Glasser; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; J Anthony Wilson; Timothy S Coalson; Bruce Fischl; Jesper L Andersson; Junqian Xu; Saad Jbabdi; Matthew Webster; Jonathan R Polimeni; David C Van Essen; Mark Jenkinson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  72 in total

1.  Brain network modularity predicts cognitive training-related gains in young adults.

Authors:  Pauline L Baniqued; Courtney L Gallen; Michael B Kranz; Arthur F Kramer; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Intrinsic neurocognitive network connectivity differences between normal aging and mild cognitive impairment are associated with cognitive status and age.

Authors:  Margot D Sullivan; John A E Anderson; Gary R Turner; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Activation-based association profiles differentiate network roles across cognitive loads.

Authors:  Nianming Zuo; Alireza Salami; Yihong Yang; Zhengyi Yang; Jing Sui; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Takuya Ito; Carrisa Cocuzza; Ruben Sanchez-Romero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Scale-invariant rearrangement of resting state networks in the human brain under sustained stimulation.

Authors:  Silvia Tommasin; Daniele Mascali; Marta Moraschi; Tommaso Gili; Ibrahim Eid Hassan; Michela Fratini; Mauro DiNuzzo; Richard G Wise; Silvia Mangia; Emiliano Macaluso; Federico Giove
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Functional cerebral asymmetry analyses reveal how the control system implements its flexibility.

Authors:  Zhencai Chen; Xiaoyue Zhao; Jin Fan; Antao Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The fronto-insular cortex causally mediates the default-mode and central-executive networks to contribute to individual cognitive performance in healthy elderly.

Authors:  Rui Li; Shouzi Zhang; Shufei Yin; Weicong Ren; Rongqiao He; Juan Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Thalamus is a common locus of reading, arithmetic, and IQ: Analysis of local intrinsic functional properties.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; Peter J Molfese; Michael P Milham; W Einar Mencl; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Topology of Functional Connectivity and Hub Dynamics in the Beta Band As Temporal Prior for Natural Vision in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Viviana Betti; Maurizio Corbetta; Francesco de Pasquale; Vincent Wens; Stefania Della Penna
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Tracking mood fluctuations with functional network patterns.

Authors:  Nykan Mirchi; Richard F Betzel; Boris C Bernhardt; Alain Dagher; Bratislav Mišic
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.