Suzanne V Arnold1, Anna Grodzinsky2, Kensey L Gosch2, Mikhail Kosiborod2, Philip G Jones2, Tracie Breeding2, Arooge Towheed2, John Beltrame2, Karen P Alexander2, John A Spertus2. 1. From the Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (S.V.A., A.G., K.L.G., M.K., P.G.J., T.B., J.A.S.); University of Missouri-Kansas City (S.V.A., A.G., M.K., A.T., J.A.S.); University of Adelaide, Australia (J.B.); and Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (K.P.A.). suz.v.arnold@gmail.com. 2. From the Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (S.V.A., A.G., K.L.G., M.K., P.G.J., T.B., J.A.S.); University of Missouri-Kansas City (S.V.A., A.G., M.K., A.T., J.A.S.); University of Adelaide, Australia (J.B.); and Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (K.P.A.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Under-recognition of angina by physicians may result in undertreatment with revascularization or medications that could improve patients' quality of life. We sought to describe characteristics associated with under-recognition of patients' angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with coronary disease from 25 US cardiology outpatient practices completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire before their clinic visit, quantifying their frequency of angina during the previous month. Immediately after the clinic visit, physicians independently quantified their patients' angina. Angina frequency was categorized as none, monthly, and daily/weekly. Among 1257 patients, 411 reported angina in the previous month, of whom 173 (42%) were under-recognized by their physician, defined as the physician reporting a lower frequency category of angina than the patient. In a hierarchical logistic model, heart failure (odds ratio, 3.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.89-4.95) and less-frequent angina (odds ratio for monthly angina [versus daily/weekly], 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.56) were associated with greater odds of under-recognition. No other patient or physician factors were associated with under-recognition. Significant variability across physicians (median odds ratio, 2.06) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Under-recognition of angina is common in routine clinical practice. Although patients with less-frequent angina and those with heart failure more often had their angina under-recognized, most variation was unrelated to patient and physician characteristics. The large variation across physicians suggests that some physicians are more accurate in assessing angina frequency than others. Standardized prospective use of a validated clinical tool, such as the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, should be tested as a means to improve recognition of angina and, potentially, improve appropriate treatment of angina.
BACKGROUND: Under-recognition of angina by physicians may result in undertreatment with revascularization or medications that could improve patients' quality of life. We sought to describe characteristics associated with under-recognition of patients' angina. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with coronary disease from 25 US cardiology outpatient practices completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire before their clinic visit, quantifying their frequency of angina during the previous month. Immediately after the clinic visit, physicians independently quantified their patients' angina. Angina frequency was categorized as none, monthly, and daily/weekly. Among 1257 patients, 411 reported angina in the previous month, of whom 173 (42%) were under-recognized by their physician, defined as the physician reporting a lower frequency category of angina than the patient. In a hierarchical logistic model, heart failure (odds ratio, 3.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.89-4.95) and less-frequent angina (odds ratio for monthly angina [versus daily/weekly], 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.56) were associated with greater odds of under-recognition. No other patient or physician factors were associated with under-recognition. Significant variability across physicians (median odds ratio, 2.06) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Under-recognition of angina is common in routine clinical practice. Although patients with less-frequent angina and those with heart failure more often had their angina under-recognized, most variation was unrelated to patient and physician characteristics. The large variation across physicians suggests that some physicians are more accurate in assessing angina frequency than others. Standardized prospective use of a validated clinical tool, such as the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, should be tested as a means to improve recognition of angina and, potentially, improve appropriate treatment of angina.
Authors: Joseph Drozda; Joseph V Messer; John Spertus; Bruce Abramowitz; Karen Alexander; Craig T Beam; Robert O Bonow; Jill S Burkiewicz; Michael Crouch; David C Goff; Richard Hellman; Thomas James; Marjorie L King; Edison A Machado; Eduardo Ortiz; Michael O'Toole; Stephen D Persell; Jesse M Pines; Frank J Rybicki; Lawrence B Sadwin; Joanna D Sikkema; Peter K Smith; Patrick J Torcson; John B Wong Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Gregory J Dehmer; John W Hirshfeld; Peter K Smith; John A Spertus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J A Spertus; J A Winder; T A Dewhurst; R A Deyo; J Prodzinski; M McDonell; S D Fihn Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; David A Morrow; Yang Lei; David J Cohen; Elizabeth M Mahoney; Eugene Braunwald; Paul S Chan Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-06-02
Authors: Daniel M Blumenthal; Jordan B Strom; Linda R Valsdottir; Sydney E Howard; Neil W Wagle; Kalon K L Ho; Daniel M Horn; Sandra M O'Keefe; Jason H Wasfy; Joshua P Metlay; Robert W Yeh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-11
Authors: Kathleen Kearney; Ravi S Hira; Robert F Riley; Arun Kalyanasundaram; William L Lombardi Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Jesse Xiaolong Yang; Margaret J Stevenson; Linda Valsdottir; Kalon Ho; John A Spertus; Robert W Yeh; Jordan B Strom Journal: Heart Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Yevgeniy Khariton; Sophia Airhart; Adam C Salisbury; John A Spertus; Kensey L Gosch; J Aaron Grantham; Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Jeffrey W Moses; William J Nicholson; David J Cohen; William Lombardi; James Sapontis; James M McCabe Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Manesh R Patel; John H Calhoon; Gregory J Dehmer; James Aaron Grantham; Thomas M Maddox; David J Maron; Peter K Smith Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mohammed Qintar; John A Spertus; Kensey L Gosch; John Beltrame; Faraz Kureshi; Ali Shafiq; Tracie Breeding; Karen P Alexander; Suzanne V Arnold Journal: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Date: 2016-03-25
Authors: Krishna K Patel; Suzanne V Arnold; Paul S Chan; Yuanyuan Tang; Philip G Jones; Jianping Guo; Donna M Buchanan; Mohammed Qintar; Carole Decker; David A Morrow; John A Spertus Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 4.749