| Literature DB >> 27531892 |
Jiansong Ji1, Min Xu1, Jianfei Tu1, Zhongwei Zhao1, Jun Gao2, Minjiang Chen1, Jingjing Song1, Haidong Zhu3, Xingyao Cheng1, Junguo Hui1, Xilin Lan1, Xiaoming Yang4.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks the fourth common cancer and the third common cause of cancer mortality among Chinese population. The development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were confirmed to be involved in complex interactions between environmental and genetic factors. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been found to play an important role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Emerging evidence suggested that upregulation of miR-155, one of the best characterized miRNAs, could serve as a promising marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of many cancers, except for HCC. In current we tested the hypothesis that functional variant rs767649 located in the flanking region of miR-155 gene contributes to the development and survival of HCC. We identified that functional variant rs767649 in miR-155 regulation region was associated with risk and survival of HCC. The minor allele of rs767649 was significantly associated with an increased risk of HCC (OR=1.23, 95% CI=1.11-1.36, P = 7.97x10-5). The genotype TT of rs767649 was significantly associated with a 1.94 fold poor survival of HCC (HR=1.94, 95% CI=1.01-3.79), while 1.15 fold for genotype AT (HR=1.15, 95% CI=1.06-1.25). Results showed that miR-155 was highly overexpressed in HCC tissues, compared with the adjacent normal tissues (P<0.001). The allele T contributes to higher expression of miR-155 in both the HCC tissues and the adjacent non-tumor tissues (P< 0.01). Our findings suggested that miR-155 and its functional variant rs767649 might contribute to the increased risk and poor prognosis of HCC, highlighting the importance of miR-155 in the prevention and prognosis of HCC.Entities:
Keywords: miRNA; microRNA-155; susceptibility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27531892 PMCID: PMC5312385 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Comparison of HCC patients and controls by selective characteristics
| Variables | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases (n=500) | Controls (n=500) | P value | Cases (n=1000) | Controls (n=1000) | P value | |
| Age (years) | 58.7±3.2 | 58.5±2.7 | 0.286 | 52.3±4.1 | 52.1±4.8 | 0.316 |
| Gender (male) | 300 (60.0%) | 310 (62.0%) | 0.517 | 620 (62.0%) | 612 (61.2%) | 0.713 |
| HBV infection (HBsAg +) | 110 (22.0%) | 51 (10.2%) | 221 (22.1%) | 84 (8.4%) | ||
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Ever | 100 (20.0%) | 101 (20.2%) | 0.937 | 192 (19.2%) | 172 (17.2%) | 0.246 |
| Never | 400 (80.0%) | 399 (79.8%) | 808 (80.8%) | 828 (82.8%) | ||
| Alcohol status | ||||||
| Ever | 120 (24.0%) | 130 (26.0%) | 0.465 | 199 (19.9%) | 201 (20.1%) | 0.911 |
| Never | 380 (86.0%) | 370 (84.0%) | 801 (80.1%) | 799 (79.9%) | ||
Functional variant rs767649 and HCC risk in stage 1
| Genotype | Cases | Controls | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 163 (32.6%) | 200 (40.0%) | 1.00 (reference) |
| AT | 246 (49.2%) | 225 (45.0%) | 1.34 (1.02-1.76) |
| TT | 91 (18.2%) | 75 (15.0%) | 1.48 (1.03-2.15) |
| AT+TT vs AA | 337/163 | 300/200 | 1.37 (1.06-1.78) |
| TT vs AT+AA | 91/409 | 75/425 | 1.26 (0.90-1.76) |
| T vs A | 1.25 (1.04-1.49) | ||
| P trend |
Adjusted for age at diagnosis, gender, HBV infection, smoking status and alcohol status
Functional variant rs767649 and HCC risk in stage 2 and the total effect
| Genotype | Stage 2 | Total effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | Cases | Controls | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
| AA | 325 (32.5%) | 382 (38.2%) | 1.00 (reference) | 488 (32.5%) | 582 (38.8%) | 1.00 (reference) |
| AT | 489 (48.9%) | 472 (47.2%) | 1.22 (1.00-1.48) | 735 (49.0%) | 697 (46.5%) | 1.26 (1.07-1.47) |
| TT | 186 (18.6%) | 146 (14.6%) | 1.49 (1.15-1.94) | 277 (18.5%) | 221 (14.7%) | 1.49 (1.21-1.85) |
| AT+TT vs AA | 675/325 | 618/382 | 1.28 (1.07-1.54) | 1012/488 | 918/582 | 1.31 (1.13-1.53) |
| TT vs AT+AA | 186/814 | 146/854 | 1.33 (1.05-1.69) | 277/1223 | 221/1279 | 1.31 (1.08-1.59) |
| T vs A | 1.22 (1.07-1.39) | 1.23 (1.11-1.36) | ||||
| P trend | ||||||
Adjusted for age at diagnosis, gender, HBV infection, smoking status and alcohol status
Stratified analyses of association between rs767649 and HCC risk
| Genotype | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| HBsAg + | HBsAg − | |
| AA | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) |
| AT | 1.24 (0.99-1.55) | 1.27 (1.06-1.52) |
| TT | 1.47 (0.90-2.39) | 1.50 (1.18-1.91) |
| T vs A | 1.22 (1.01-1.66) | 1.23 (1.09-1.39) |
| P trend | ||
Adjusted for age at diagnosis, gender, smoking status and alcohol status
Functional variant rs767649 and HCC risk survival
| Genotypes | Case | Overall survival | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Events | HR (95% CI) | ||
| AA | 453 | 330 | 1.00 (reference) |
| AT | 708 | 576 | 1.11 (1.04-1.19) |
| TT | 261 | 219 | 1.15 (1.06-1.25) |
| AT+TT | 969 | 795 | 1.13 (1.06-1.19) |
Adjusted for age at diagnosis, gender, HBV infection, smoking status and alcohol status
Figure 1Comparison of miR-155 expression levels between HCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues
A. Analysis showed that the relative expression levels of miR-155 in the HCC tissues were significantly higher than those in adjacent non-tumor tissues (P< 0.001). B. Variant rs767649 and expression level of miR-155 (P< 0.01).